Elsevier

Nutrition

Volume 31, Issue 5, May 2015, Pages 640-646
Nutrition

Meta-analysis
The effect of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2014.11.015Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The cactus pear, Opuntia ficus-indica (OFI), is marketed under trade names such as Proactol and XLS medical, with “certified” claims of clinical efficacy in obesity management.

  • OFI-containing supplements are also being marketed as antidiabetic agents.

  • The results from our meta-analysis of published clinical trials do not indicate that OFI supplementation has significant beneficial effects on body weight.

  • Our results suggested that OFI intake causes significant reductions in body mass index, percentage body fat and total; however, the effect sizes are small and do not reach clinical significance.

  • Few clinical trials evaluating the effects of OFI in obesity management have been conducted; they vary in design and methodology.

Abstract

Objectives

Hundreds of dietary supplements are currently marketed as weight loss supplements. However, the advertised health claims of effectiveness for most of these have not been proven. The aim of this study was to critically appraise and evaluate the evidence for effectiveness of cactus pear, Opuntia ficus-indica (OFI), using data from published randomized clinical trials.

Methods

We conducted electronic searches in Medline, Embase, Amed, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library. No restrictions on age, time, or language were imposed. The risk for bias in the studies included was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration criteria. Two reviewers independently determined the eligibility of included studies, assessed reporting quality, and extracted data.

Results

We identified seven eligible studies, of which five were included. The studies varied in design and reporting quality. Meta-analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference in body weight between OFI and controls (mean difference = −0.83 kg; 95% confidence interval, −2.49 to 0.83; I2 = 93%). Significant reductions in body mass index, percentage body fat, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and total cholesterol were observed. Adverse events included gastric intolerance and flu symptoms.

Conclusion

The evidence from randomized clinical trials does not indicate that supplementation with OFI generates statistically significant effects on body weight. Consumption of OFI can cause significant reductions in percentage body fat, blood pressure, and total cholesterol. Few clinical trials evaluating the effects of OFI have been published. They vary in design and methodology, and are characterized by inconsistent quality of reporting. Further clinical trials evaluating the effects of OFI on body composition and metabolic parameters are warranted.

Introduction

The increased prevalence of obesity and overweight has led to the proliferation of various dietary supplements on the market, with varying claims of effectiveness. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness for most of these products is not proven, and clinicians are sometimes uncertain about the therapeutic value of using such agents [1]. One such supplement being touted as having an antiobesity effect is the cactus pear, Opuntia ficus-indica (OFI).

OFI is a domesticated cactus plant that has been an important part of agricultural economies in the arid and semiarid regions of the world [2]. The fruits of the OFI are edible, and can be lime green, orange, red, or purple, depending on the ratios or concentrations of its constituent pigments [3]. Cactus pear is rich in betalains, which are bioactive compounds thought to be responsible for its positive health effects [4]. In addition to its nutritional use, the cactus pear is thought to possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [5], [6], [7], and has been used as an artificial sweetener in the food industry [8]. In humans, consumption of OFI has been shown to improve platelet function [9] and also to confer protection against peptic ulcer [10].

More recently, there has been increased interest in the possible role of OFI in the management of obesity and body metabolic parameters. Results of animal research have suggested that OFI intake can lead to reductions in body weight via diuresis [11], decrease blood glucose by enhancing basal plasma insulin concentration [12], [13], and improve lipid profile through scavenging of intracellular radicals [14], [15], [16]. Randomized and nonrandomized human studies have shown that OFI could attenuate postprandial hyperglycemia by stimulating glucose uptake in the peripheral tissues [17], [18], [19]. Studies in humans also have demonstrated that consumption of OFI causes marked reductions in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triacylglycerols (TGs) in patients with dyslipidemias by up-regulating binding of LDL receptors in the liver [20], [21].

Clinical trials examining the effect of OFI on body weight and composition and lipid profile have been conducted, but the effectiveness of this supplement as a weight loss aid has not been established. Therefore, the objective of this review was to critically appraise and evaluate the evidence for effectiveness of OFI as a weight loss supplement, using data from published trials in humans.

Section snippets

Methods

Electronic searches were conducted in the following databases: Medline, Embase, Amed, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library. Each database was searched from inception through April 2014. The search terms used included opuntia, neopuntia, cactus, cactus pear, spineless cactus, prickly pear, nopal, litramine, body weight, overweight, obesity, weight loss, body composition, body fat, waist circumference, cholesterol, triacylglycerols, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood sugar, and

Results

Our electronic searches identified 76 nonduplicate citations, of which 7 eligible studies were identified (Fig. 1). One RCT was excluded because it did not report relevant outcomes [25], and another because OFI was combined with other weight loss supplements [26]. Thus, five RCTs with a total of 382 participants were included in the review [27], [28], [29], [30], [31].

There were variations in the risk for bias across the included studies (Fig. 2). Only 40% of the RCTs adequately reported

Main findings

The results of this meta-analysis indicated that supplementation with OFI does not generate statistically significant reductions in body weight and waist circumference. The results also suggest that OFI ingestion results in significant reductions in BMI, %BF, SBP and DBP, and TC. The results of the meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution because of the high heterogeneity observed in some of the analyses, and the lack of consistency in the direction of study results between the overall

Conclusions

The evidence from published RCTs does not show that OFI intake has beneficial effects on body weight. Evidence also suggests that OFI generates beneficial effects on %BF, BMI, and TC; the effect sizes are small, and the clinical relevance is doubtful. OFI appears to cause significant reductions in SBP and DBP. Few clinical trials evaluating the effects of OFI have been published; they vary in design and methodology, and the majority are characterized by flaws in reporting quality. Further

References (51)

  • M.P. Griffith

    The origins of an important cactus crop, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence

    Am J Bot

    (2004)
  • P. Felker et al.

    Colour inheritance in cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruits

    Annal Appl Biol

    (2008)
  • M.A. Livrea et al.

    Health benefits and bioactive components of the fruits from Opuntia ficus-indica

    J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev

    (2006)
  • F.C. Stintzing et al.

    Color, betalain pattern, and antioxidant properties of cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) clones

    J Agric Food Chem

    (2005)
  • J. Wiese et al.

    Effect of Opuntia ficus indica on symptoms of the alcohol hangover

    Arch Intern Med

    (2004)
  • C. Sáenz et al.

    Cactus pear fruit: a new source for a natural sweetner

    Plant Foods Hum Nutr

    (1998)
  • E.M. Galati et al.

    Chemical characterization and biological effects of Sicilian Opuntia ficus indica (L.) mill. Fruit juice: antioxidant and antiulcerogenic activity

    J Agric Food Chem

    (2003)
  • J.F. Bisson et al.

    Diuretic and antioxidant effects of Cacti-Nea, a dehydrated water extract from prickly pear fruit, in rats

    Phytother Res

    (2010)
  • V. Butterweck et al.

    Comparative evaluation of two different Opuntia ficus-indica extracts for blood sugar lowering effects in rats

    Phytother Res

    (2011)
  • M.L. Cárdenas Medellín et al.

    [Effect of raw and cooked nopal (Opuntia ficus indica) ingestion on growth and profile of total cholesterol, lipoproteins, and blood glucose in rats]. [Article in Spanish]

    Arch Latinoam Nutr

    (1998)
  • P.S. Oh et al.

    Glycoprotein (90 kDa) isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica var. saboten MAKINO lowers plasma lipid level through scavenging of intracellular radicals in Triton WR-1339-induced mice

    Biol Pharm Bull

    (2006)
  • S. Halmi et al.

    Pharmaco-toxicologic study of Opuntia ficus indica L. aqueous extract in experimental animals

    Int J Med Arom Plants

    (2003)
  • K. Van Proeyen et al.

    Opuntia ficus-indica ingestion stimulates peripheral disposal of oral glucose before and after exercise in healthy men

    Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab

    (2012)
  • A.C. Frati-Munari et al.

    [Effect of a dehydrated extract of nopal (Opuntia ficus indica Mill.) on blood glucose]. [Article in Spanish]

    Arch Invest Med (Mex)

    (1989)
  • L. Deldicque et al.

    Additive insulinogenic action of Opuntia ficus-indica cladode and fruit skin extract and leucine after exercise in healthy males

    J Int Soc Sports Nutr

    (2013)
  • Cited by (45)

    • Recent developments on Opuntia spp., their bioactive composition, nutritional values, and health effects

      2022, Food Bioscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Opuntia intake can lead to a decrease in blood pressure, and it should not be recommended as a supplement to current hypertensive treatment because its extracts may interfere with diabetes medications and possibly trigger hypoglycemic episodes in patients with diabetes. ( Onakpoya et al., 2015). Considering all plant remedies include chemical compounds that are highly poisonous and are listed in the Hazardous Substances Data Bank (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland), it is necessary to conduct additional research to assess the possible hazards of utilizing Opuntia (Osuna-Martínez et al., 2014).

    • Prickly pear juice consumption after fat intake affects postprandial heart rate variability but not traditional risk factors of cardiovascular disease in healthy men

      2022, Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      PP is a sweet and uniquely flavored fruit that grows on a drought-resistant cactus native to the Americas [17–19]. The fruit and the leaf have historically been used in traditional medicines [17–19] and are suggested to have anti-atherosclerotic [11] and anti-hyperglycemic [20–26] properties. Several articles have reviewed the effects of PP consumption (fruit flesh, juice, fruit-based capsules, or powder supplements) on the amounts of body fat (%) [25], BP [25], total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triacylglycerides (TGs), and [11,25,26], heart rate variability (HRV) [27], but not on body weight [25,26].

    • Targeting dyslipidemia by herbal medicines: A systematic review of meta-analyses

      2021, Journal of Ethnopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The remaining 60 meta-analyses have been categorized as “other herbal medicines” group, as they contained lower number of herbal medicines. This group was included pooled effect of avocado, berberis, cinnamon, cumin, fenugreek, garlic, ginger, ginseng, grape, sour tea, pomegranate, saffron, cayenne pepper, cardamom, purslane, aronia, rhus, tulsi, Artichoke, white mulberry, Spirulina, and other herbs (Mahmassani et al., 2018; Peou et al., 2016; Pourmasoumi et al., 2018, 2019, 2020; Hadi et al., 2019a, 2019b; Zhang et al., 2016b, 2019, 2020; Ju et al., 2018; Phimarn et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2016; Lan et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2013; Heydarpour et al., 2020; Ainehchi et al., 2019; Allen et al., 2013; Jafarnejad et al., 2017, 2018; Askarpour et al., 2020; Heshmat-Ghahdarijani et al., 2020; Khodamoradi et al., 2020; Gong et al., 2016; Shabani et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2018; Ried et al., 2013; Silagy and Neil, 1994; Maharlouei et al., 2019; Mazidi et al., 2016; Ziaei et al., 2020; Hernández-García et al., 2019; Gui et al., 2016; Asbaghi et al., 2019, 2020b; Feringa et al., 2011; Bule et al., 2020; Najafpour Boushehri et al., 2020; Aziz et al., 2013; Jandari et al., 2020; Sahebkar et al., 2016a, 2016c, 2018; Taherifard et al., 2020; Rahmani et al., 2019a, 2019b; Hallajzadeh et al., 2020; Jang et al., 2020; Payab et al., 2020; Shekarchizadeh-Esfahani et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020; Akbari-Fakhrabadi et al., 2018; Mohammadi et al., 2019a; Jamshidi et al., 2018; Teoh et al., 2018;; Sawangjit et al., 2017; Daryabeygi-Khotbehsara et al., 2017; Serban et al., 2016; Onakpoya et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2013). Along with healthy subjects, the underlying disorders of participants were DM, HLP, obesity, NAFLD, CAD, MetS, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and HTN.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    IJO and JOS were involved in the design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. CJH was involved in the design, data analysis, and interpretation of the manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

    View full text