Meta-analysisThe effect of cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Introduction
The increased prevalence of obesity and overweight has led to the proliferation of various dietary supplements on the market, with varying claims of effectiveness. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness for most of these products is not proven, and clinicians are sometimes uncertain about the therapeutic value of using such agents [1]. One such supplement being touted as having an antiobesity effect is the cactus pear, Opuntia ficus-indica (OFI).
OFI is a domesticated cactus plant that has been an important part of agricultural economies in the arid and semiarid regions of the world [2]. The fruits of the OFI are edible, and can be lime green, orange, red, or purple, depending on the ratios or concentrations of its constituent pigments [3]. Cactus pear is rich in betalains, which are bioactive compounds thought to be responsible for its positive health effects [4]. In addition to its nutritional use, the cactus pear is thought to possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [5], [6], [7], and has been used as an artificial sweetener in the food industry [8]. In humans, consumption of OFI has been shown to improve platelet function [9] and also to confer protection against peptic ulcer [10].
More recently, there has been increased interest in the possible role of OFI in the management of obesity and body metabolic parameters. Results of animal research have suggested that OFI intake can lead to reductions in body weight via diuresis [11], decrease blood glucose by enhancing basal plasma insulin concentration [12], [13], and improve lipid profile through scavenging of intracellular radicals [14], [15], [16]. Randomized and nonrandomized human studies have shown that OFI could attenuate postprandial hyperglycemia by stimulating glucose uptake in the peripheral tissues [17], [18], [19]. Studies in humans also have demonstrated that consumption of OFI causes marked reductions in total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triacylglycerols (TGs) in patients with dyslipidemias by up-regulating binding of LDL receptors in the liver [20], [21].
Clinical trials examining the effect of OFI on body weight and composition and lipid profile have been conducted, but the effectiveness of this supplement as a weight loss aid has not been established. Therefore, the objective of this review was to critically appraise and evaluate the evidence for effectiveness of OFI as a weight loss supplement, using data from published trials in humans.
Section snippets
Methods
Electronic searches were conducted in the following databases: Medline, Embase, Amed, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library. Each database was searched from inception through April 2014. The search terms used included opuntia, neopuntia, cactus, cactus pear, spineless cactus, prickly pear, nopal, litramine, body weight, overweight, obesity, weight loss, body composition, body fat, waist circumference, cholesterol, triacylglycerols, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, blood sugar, and
Results
Our electronic searches identified 76 nonduplicate citations, of which 7 eligible studies were identified (Fig. 1). One RCT was excluded because it did not report relevant outcomes [25], and another because OFI was combined with other weight loss supplements [26]. Thus, five RCTs with a total of 382 participants were included in the review [27], [28], [29], [30], [31].
There were variations in the risk for bias across the included studies (Fig. 2). Only 40% of the RCTs adequately reported
Main findings
The results of this meta-analysis indicated that supplementation with OFI does not generate statistically significant reductions in body weight and waist circumference. The results also suggest that OFI ingestion results in significant reductions in BMI, %BF, SBP and DBP, and TC. The results of the meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution because of the high heterogeneity observed in some of the analyses, and the lack of consistency in the direction of study results between the overall
Conclusions
The evidence from published RCTs does not show that OFI intake has beneficial effects on body weight. Evidence also suggests that OFI generates beneficial effects on %BF, BMI, and TC; the effect sizes are small, and the clinical relevance is doubtful. OFI appears to cause significant reductions in SBP and DBP. Few clinical trials evaluating the effects of OFI have been published; they vary in design and methodology, and the majority are characterized by flaws in reporting quality. Further
References (51)
- et al.
Regular ingestion of opuntia robusta lowers oxidation injury
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids
(2001) - et al.
Daily prickly pear consumption improves platelet function
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids
(2003) - et al.
Evaluation of some biological parameters of Opuntia ficus indica. 1. Influence of a seed oil supplemented diet on rats
Bioresour Technol
(2006) - et al.
Supplementation with cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruit decreases oxidative stress in healthy humans: a comparative study with vitamin C
Am J Clin Nutr
(2004) - et al.
Acute blood glucose lowering effects and long-term safety of OpunDia supplementation in prediabetic males and females
J Ethnopharmacol
(2010) - et al.
A dietary pattern including nopal, chia seed, soy protein, and oat reduces serum triacylglycerols and glucose intolerance in patients with metabolic syndrome
J Nutr
(2012) - et al.
Total polyphenol excretion and blood pressure in subjects at high cardiovascular risk
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
(2011) - et al.
Opuntia ficus indica (nopal) attenuates hepatic steatosis and oxidative stress in obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats
J Nutr
(2012) - et al.
Short-term effects of weight loss with or without low-intensity exercise training on fat metabolism in obese men
Am J Clin Nutr
(2001) - et al.
Food supplements for body weight reduction: a systematic review of systematic reviews
Obesity
(2011)
The origins of an important cactus crop, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence
Am J Bot
Colour inheritance in cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruits
Annal Appl Biol
Health benefits and bioactive components of the fruits from Opuntia ficus-indica
J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev
Color, betalain pattern, and antioxidant properties of cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) clones
J Agric Food Chem
Effect of Opuntia ficus indica on symptoms of the alcohol hangover
Arch Intern Med
Cactus pear fruit: a new source for a natural sweetner
Plant Foods Hum Nutr
Chemical characterization and biological effects of Sicilian Opuntia ficus indica (L.) mill. Fruit juice: antioxidant and antiulcerogenic activity
J Agric Food Chem
Diuretic and antioxidant effects of Cacti-Nea, a dehydrated water extract from prickly pear fruit, in rats
Phytother Res
Comparative evaluation of two different Opuntia ficus-indica extracts for blood sugar lowering effects in rats
Phytother Res
[Effect of raw and cooked nopal (Opuntia ficus indica) ingestion on growth and profile of total cholesterol, lipoproteins, and blood glucose in rats]. [Article in Spanish]
Arch Latinoam Nutr
Glycoprotein (90 kDa) isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica var. saboten MAKINO lowers plasma lipid level through scavenging of intracellular radicals in Triton WR-1339-induced mice
Biol Pharm Bull
Pharmaco-toxicologic study of Opuntia ficus indica L. aqueous extract in experimental animals
Int J Med Arom Plants
Opuntia ficus-indica ingestion stimulates peripheral disposal of oral glucose before and after exercise in healthy men
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab
[Effect of a dehydrated extract of nopal (Opuntia ficus indica Mill.) on blood glucose]. [Article in Spanish]
Arch Invest Med (Mex)
Additive insulinogenic action of Opuntia ficus-indica cladode and fruit skin extract and leucine after exercise in healthy males
J Int Soc Sports Nutr
Cited by (45)
Recent developments on Opuntia spp., their bioactive composition, nutritional values, and health effects
2022, Food BioscienceCitation Excerpt :Opuntia intake can lead to a decrease in blood pressure, and it should not be recommended as a supplement to current hypertensive treatment because its extracts may interfere with diabetes medications and possibly trigger hypoglycemic episodes in patients with diabetes. ( Onakpoya et al., 2015). Considering all plant remedies include chemical compounds that are highly poisonous and are listed in the Hazardous Substances Data Bank (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland), it is necessary to conduct additional research to assess the possible hazards of utilizing Opuntia (Osuna-Martínez et al., 2014).
Prickly pear juice consumption after fat intake affects postprandial heart rate variability but not traditional risk factors of cardiovascular disease in healthy men
2022, NutritionCitation Excerpt :PP is a sweet and uniquely flavored fruit that grows on a drought-resistant cactus native to the Americas [17–19]. The fruit and the leaf have historically been used in traditional medicines [17–19] and are suggested to have anti-atherosclerotic [11] and anti-hyperglycemic [20–26] properties. Several articles have reviewed the effects of PP consumption (fruit flesh, juice, fruit-based capsules, or powder supplements) on the amounts of body fat (%) [25], BP [25], total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triacylglycerides (TGs), and [11,25,26], heart rate variability (HRV) [27], but not on body weight [25,26].
Targeting dyslipidemia by herbal medicines: A systematic review of meta-analyses
2021, Journal of EthnopharmacologyCitation Excerpt :The remaining 60 meta-analyses have been categorized as “other herbal medicines” group, as they contained lower number of herbal medicines. This group was included pooled effect of avocado, berberis, cinnamon, cumin, fenugreek, garlic, ginger, ginseng, grape, sour tea, pomegranate, saffron, cayenne pepper, cardamom, purslane, aronia, rhus, tulsi, Artichoke, white mulberry, Spirulina, and other herbs (Mahmassani et al., 2018; Peou et al., 2016; Pourmasoumi et al., 2018, 2019, 2020; Hadi et al., 2019a, 2019b; Zhang et al., 2016b, 2019, 2020; Ju et al., 2018; Phimarn et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2016; Lan et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2013; Heydarpour et al., 2020; Ainehchi et al., 2019; Allen et al., 2013; Jafarnejad et al., 2017, 2018; Askarpour et al., 2020; Heshmat-Ghahdarijani et al., 2020; Khodamoradi et al., 2020; Gong et al., 2016; Shabani et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2018; Ried et al., 2013; Silagy and Neil, 1994; Maharlouei et al., 2019; Mazidi et al., 2016; Ziaei et al., 2020; Hernández-García et al., 2019; Gui et al., 2016; Asbaghi et al., 2019, 2020b; Feringa et al., 2011; Bule et al., 2020; Najafpour Boushehri et al., 2020; Aziz et al., 2013; Jandari et al., 2020; Sahebkar et al., 2016a, 2016c, 2018; Taherifard et al., 2020; Rahmani et al., 2019a, 2019b; Hallajzadeh et al., 2020; Jang et al., 2020; Payab et al., 2020; Shekarchizadeh-Esfahani et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020; Akbari-Fakhrabadi et al., 2018; Mohammadi et al., 2019a; Jamshidi et al., 2018; Teoh et al., 2018;; Sawangjit et al., 2017; Daryabeygi-Khotbehsara et al., 2017; Serban et al., 2016; Onakpoya et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2013). Along with healthy subjects, the underlying disorders of participants were DM, HLP, obesity, NAFLD, CAD, MetS, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and HTN.
The effects of Prickly Pear fruit and cladode (Opuntia spp.) consumption on blood lipids: A systematic review
2020, Complementary Therapies in Medicine
IJO and JOS were involved in the design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. CJH was involved in the design, data analysis, and interpretation of the manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.