Review
Asymmetric stem cell division: Lessons from Drosophila

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.01.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Asymmetric cell division is an important and conserved strategy in the generation of cellular diversity during animal development. Many of our insights into the underlying mechanisms of asymmetric cell division have been gained from Drosophila, including the establishment of polarity, orientation of mitotic spindles and segregation of cell fate determinants. Recent studies are also beginning to reveal the connection between the misregulation of asymmetric cell division and cancer. What we are learning from Drosophila as a model system has implication both for stem cell biology and also cancer research.

Introduction

Early studies on ascidian and leech cell lineages more than one century ago first postulated that the asymmetric distribution of cell substances in cell division might affect cell fate [1], [2]. In Drosophila the molecular basis of asymmetric cell division began to be unravelled with the discovery of the cell fate determinant Numb in sensory organ precursors (SOP) and its role in cellular identity specification [3]. Since then this topic has been intensively studied and considerable insights have been gained from many laboratories using different model systems including the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote, Drosophila neuroblasts, sensory organ precursors, and more recently, germline stem cells (GSCs), as well as mammalian neuroepithelial cells [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Given the cancer stem cell hypothesis [14], [15], [16], the study of asymmetric cell division is likely to contribute to our understanding of stem cell biology and cancer biology.

Stem cells are unique in their ability to self-renew and to produce daughter cells committed to differentiation. In addition, they use a balance of symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions to regulate the number of stem cells and differentiated cells. Symmetric divisions lead to two identical daughter cells, whereas following an asymmetric cell division the smaller of the two daughter cells differentiates. It is crucial for stem cells to tightly control this choice between symmetric proliferative divisions and asymmetric differentiative divisions during development and tissue repair because, if cellular homeostasis is not maintained, premature differentiation may lead to incomplete tissue or organ development, whereas uncontrolled proliferation can lead to tumour formation [16].

In this review we summarise recent key discoveries in this field mostly from Drosophila neural stem cells, or neuroblasts (NB). Our main goal is to describe the machinery that orchestrates asymmetric NB division during development. We focus on the establishment of cell polarity, the regulation of mitotic spindle orientation, centrosome asymmetry and the asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants. And we explore how this affects the proliferation and differentiation of the generated daughter cells. We also briefly discuss how asymmetrically dividing NBs arise from symmetrically dividing neuroepithelial cells and what mechanisms might be involved in the switch from symmetric to asymmetric division. In the last part of the review, we discuss the link between asymmetric cell division and tumour formation, as recent evidence from Drosophila shows that the impairment of asymmetric cell division can lead to tumourigenesis [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28].

Section snippets

Asymmetric cell division of Drosophila neuroblasts

Drosophila neural stem cells provide an excellent model system in which to study asymmetric cell division, due to their physical and genetic accessibility. Most NBs derive from the embryonic procephalic and ventral neuroectoderm. During embryonic neurogenesis, about 30 NBs in each hemisegment delaminate from the ventral neuroectoderm and undergo stem cell-like, asymmetric divisions, to self-renew and to generate smaller daughter cells, called ganglion mother cells (GMCs). Each GMC divides only

Asymmetric cell division and cancer

Asymmetric cell division is one strategy that stem cells have adopted to control self-renewal and differentiation. Several recent studies in Drosophila indicate that disruption of the molecular machinery regulating asymmetric cell division (including polarity establishment, mitotic spindle orientation and cell fate determinant segregation) may lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation and malignant tumour formation [28], [86], [87]. There is also evidence emerging that some human cancers

Atypical protein kinase C (aPKC)

As mentioned above, aPKC is part of the Par complex and regulates NB polarity. Strikingly, aPKC is also involved in the control of NB self-renewal and differentiation. Lee et al. show that the tumour suppressor Lgl and the polarity cue Pins restrict aPKC to the apical cortex in dividing NBs. lgl, pins double mutants exhibit ectopic cortical localisation of aPKC and a significant increase in the number of larval brain NBs [24]. Similarly, overexpression of a membrane-tethered form of aPKC leads

Role of spindle orientation

Most NBs are generated in the Drosophila embryo and derive from the neuroectoderm. However, optic lobe NBs, which form the visual system of the adult fly, are generated during larval stages. Like embryonic NBs, optic lobe NBs arise from a superficial neuroepithelium [111]. Optic lobe neuroepithelial cells undergo planar symmetric divisions to produce equivalent daughter cells that remain in the epithelium, whereas optic lobe NBs reorient their spindles along the apico-basal axis perpendicular

Conclusion

In the past decade, many advances have been made in uncovering the molecular mechanisms controlling asymmetric cell division. This includes the establishment of polarity, mitotic spindle orientation and the segregation of cell fate determinants. Furthering this understanding of symmetric and asymmetric divisions is important for elucidating stem cell behaviour and has tremendous implications for stem cell biology, stem cell therapy and cancer research.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Brand lab members for discussions and comments to the manuscript. A special thank to Bruno Bello and Heinrich Reichert for contributing unpublished data. PSW and BE are funded by the Cambridge Overseas Trust and the Swiss National Foundation, respectively. This work was funded by a Wellcome Trust Programme grant to AHB.

References (134)

  • S.P. Choksi et al.

    Prospero acts as a binary switch between self-renewal and differentiation in Drosophila neural stem cells

    Dev Cell

    (2006)
  • C.Y. Lee et al.

    Brat is a Miranda cargo protein that promotes neuronal differentiation and inhibits neuroblast self-renewal

    Dev Cell

    (2006)
  • T. Bossing et al.

    The embryonic central nervous system lineages of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Neuroblast lineages derived from the ventral half of the neuroectoderm

    Dev Biol

    (1996)
  • H. Schmidt et al.

    The embryonic central nervous system lineages of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Neuroblast lineages derived from the dorsal part of the neuroectoderm

    Dev Biol

    (1997)
  • J.B. Skeath et al.

    Genetic control of Drosophila nerve cord development

    Curr Open Neurobiol

    (2003)
  • F.T. Merkle et al.

    Neural stem cells in mammalian development

    Curr Open Cell Biol

    (2006)
  • U. Kuchinke et al.

    Control of spindle orientation in Drosophila by the Par-3-related PDZ-domain protein Bazooka

    Curr Biol

    (1998)
  • M. Schaefer et al.

    G proteins direct two modes of asymmetric cell division in the Drosophila nervous system

    Cell

    (2001)
  • F. Yu et al.

    Analysis of partner of inscuteable, a novel player of Drosophila asymmetric divisions, reveals two distinct steps in inscuteable apical localization

    Cell

    (2000)
  • Y. Cai et al.

    Apical complex genes control mitotic spindle geometry and relative size of daughter cells in Drosophila neuroblast and pI asymmetric divisions

    Cell

    (2003)
  • N. Fuse et al.

    G proteins regulate daughter cell size asymmetry in Drosophila neuroblast divisions

    Curr Biol

    (2003)
  • S.E. Siegrist et al.

    Microtubule-induced Pins/Galphai cortical polarity in Drosophila neuroblasts

    Cell

    (2005)
  • Y. Bellaiche et al.

    G proteins and regulation of size asymmetry during cell division

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (2005)
  • A. Wodarz

    Molecular control of cell polarity and asymmetric cell division in Drosophila neuroblasts

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (2005)
  • K. Afshar et al.

    RIC-8 is required for GPR-1/2-dependent Galpha function during asymmetric division of C. elegans embryos

    Cell

    (2004)
  • C. Couwenbergs et al.

    Control of embryonic spindle positioning and Galpha activity by C. elegans RIC-8

    Curr Biol

    (2004)
  • G.G. Tall et al.

    Mammalian Ric-8A (synembryn) is a heterotrimeric Galpha protein guanine nucleotide exchange factor

    J Biol Chem

    (2003)
  • C.P. Shen et al.

    Miranda is required for the asymmetric localization of Prospero during mitosis in Drosophila

    Cell

    (1997)
  • P. Li et al.

    Inscuteable and Staufen mediate asymmetric localization and segregation of prospero RNA during Drosophila neuroblast cell divisions

    Cell

    (1997)
  • C.S. Barros et al.

    Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II promotes the asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants by cortical exclusion rather than active transport

    Dev Cell

    (2003)
  • C. Petritsch et al.

    The Drosophila myosin VI Jaguar is required for basal protein targeting and correct spindle orientation in mitotic neuroblasts

    Dev Cell

    (2003)
  • C. Cabernard et al.

    Stem cell self-renewal: centrosomes on the move

    Curr Biol

    (2007)
  • E. Rebollo et al.

    Functionally unequal centrosomes drive spindle orientation in asymmetrically dividing Drosophila neural stem cells

    Dev Cell

    (2007)
  • D. Hanahan et al.

    The hallmarks of cancer

    Cell

    (2000)
  • C.Q. Doe et al.

    The prospero gene specifies cell fates in the Drosophila central nervous system

    Cell

    (1991)
  • H. Vaessin et al.

    Prospero is expressed in neuronal precursors and encodes a nuclear protein that is involved in the control of axonal outgrowth in Drosophila

    Cell

    (1991)
  • E.G. Conklin

    The organisation and cell lineage of the ascidian egg

    J Acad Natl Sci Philadelphia

    (1905)
  • C. Whitman

    The embryology of Clepsine

    Quart J Micr Sci

    (1878)
  • B. Egger et al.

    Insights into neural stem cell biology from flies

    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci

    (2008)
  • J.A. Knoblich

    Asymmetric cell division during animal development

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2001)
  • H. Wang et al.

    Drosophila neural progenitor polarity and asymmetric division

    Biol Cell

    (2005)
  • Y.M. Yamashita et al.

    Asymmetric inheritance of mother versus daughter centrosome in stem cell division

    Science

    (2007)
  • N.A. Lobo et al.

    The biology of cancer stem cells

    Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol

    (2007)
  • S.J. Morrison et al.

    Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer

    Nature

    (2006)
  • B. Bello et al.

    The brain tumor gene negatively regulates neural progenitor cell proliferation in the larval central brain of Drosophila

    Development

    (2006)
  • E. Caussinus et al.

    Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster

    Nat Genet

    (2005)
  • Y. Izumi et al.

    Drosophila Pins-binding protein Mud regulates spindle-polarity coupling and centrosome organization

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2006)
  • C.Y. Lee et al.

    Drosophila Aurora-A kinase inhibits neuroblast self-renewal by regulating aPKC/Numb cortical polarity and spindle orientation

    Genes Dev

    (2006)
  • C.Y. Lee et al.

    Lgl, Pins and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation

    Nature

    (2006)
  • K.H. Siller et al.

    The NuMA-related Mud protein binds Pins and regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (48)

    • Development of the Drosophila melanogaster embryonic CNS

      2020, Patterning and Cell Type Specification in the Developing CNS and PNS: Comprehensive Developmental Neuroscience, Second Edition
    • From the Eye to the Brain. Development of the Drosophila Visual System

      2016, Current Topics in Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The molecular mechanisms involved in such divisions from the neuroblast to the GMCs have been well characterized and reviewed in Homem and Knoblich (2012), Kang and Reichert (2015), and Sousa-Nunes and Somers (2013). Importantly, neuroblasts express Deadpan (Dpn), GMCs express Prospero (Pros), and both express Asense (Ase) (Brand & Livesey, 2011; Egger, Chell, & Brand, 2008; Egger et al., 2011; Reichert, 2011; Southall & Brand, 2009; Wu, Egger, & Brand, 2008). In recent years, examples that differ from such classic models have been characterized.

    • The BASL Polarity Protein Controls a MAPK Signaling Feedback Loop in Asymmetric Cell Division

      2015, Developmental Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of the most conserved fundamental mechanisms underlying ACD in animals is described by the intrinsic polarity model (Inaba and Yamashita, 2012; Yu et al., 2006). In the process of neuroblast ACD in Drosophila, the Par polarity complex is localized asymmetrically to the apical cortex of the neuroblast and drives a set of fate-determining factors to the opposite side to determine the asymmetric cell fates (Inaba and Yamashita, 2012; Knoblich, 2008; Prehoda, 2009; Wu et al., 2008). ACD is critical for plant growth and development since new cell types, tissues, and even entire organs are continuously produced from a limited number of stem cells (De Smet and Beeckman, 2011; Petricka et al., 2009).

    • Development of the Drosophila Embryonic Ventral Nerve Cord: From Neuroectoderm to Unique Neurons and Glia

      2013, Comprehensive Developmental Neuroscience: Patterning and Cell Type Specification in the Developing CNS and PNS
    • The par complex and integrins direct asymmetric cell division in adult intestinal stem cells

      2012, Cell Stem Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      How asymmetric cell division is controlled in Drosophila adult somatic stem cells, however, is not understood. During development, neuroblasts undergo repeated rounds of asymmetric divisions, creating neurons in a highly stereotyped lineage (Doe, 2008; Wu et al., 2008; Knoblich, 2008). They arise from a polarized epithelium from which they delaminate while maintaining the apical localization of the so-called Par complex, consisting of the adaptor proteins Bazooka (Baz; Drosophila homolog of Par-3), Par-6, and the protein kinase aPKC (Suzuki and Ohno, 2006).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contribute equally to the work.

    View full text