ReviewAsymmetric stem cell division: Lessons from Drosophila
Introduction
Early studies on ascidian and leech cell lineages more than one century ago first postulated that the asymmetric distribution of cell substances in cell division might affect cell fate [1], [2]. In Drosophila the molecular basis of asymmetric cell division began to be unravelled with the discovery of the cell fate determinant Numb in sensory organ precursors (SOP) and its role in cellular identity specification [3]. Since then this topic has been intensively studied and considerable insights have been gained from many laboratories using different model systems including the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote, Drosophila neuroblasts, sensory organ precursors, and more recently, germline stem cells (GSCs), as well as mammalian neuroepithelial cells [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Given the cancer stem cell hypothesis [14], [15], [16], the study of asymmetric cell division is likely to contribute to our understanding of stem cell biology and cancer biology.
Stem cells are unique in their ability to self-renew and to produce daughter cells committed to differentiation. In addition, they use a balance of symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions to regulate the number of stem cells and differentiated cells. Symmetric divisions lead to two identical daughter cells, whereas following an asymmetric cell division the smaller of the two daughter cells differentiates. It is crucial for stem cells to tightly control this choice between symmetric proliferative divisions and asymmetric differentiative divisions during development and tissue repair because, if cellular homeostasis is not maintained, premature differentiation may lead to incomplete tissue or organ development, whereas uncontrolled proliferation can lead to tumour formation [16].
In this review we summarise recent key discoveries in this field mostly from Drosophila neural stem cells, or neuroblasts (NB). Our main goal is to describe the machinery that orchestrates asymmetric NB division during development. We focus on the establishment of cell polarity, the regulation of mitotic spindle orientation, centrosome asymmetry and the asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants. And we explore how this affects the proliferation and differentiation of the generated daughter cells. We also briefly discuss how asymmetrically dividing NBs arise from symmetrically dividing neuroepithelial cells and what mechanisms might be involved in the switch from symmetric to asymmetric division. In the last part of the review, we discuss the link between asymmetric cell division and tumour formation, as recent evidence from Drosophila shows that the impairment of asymmetric cell division can lead to tumourigenesis [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28].
Section snippets
Asymmetric cell division of Drosophila neuroblasts
Drosophila neural stem cells provide an excellent model system in which to study asymmetric cell division, due to their physical and genetic accessibility. Most NBs derive from the embryonic procephalic and ventral neuroectoderm. During embryonic neurogenesis, about 30 NBs in each hemisegment delaminate from the ventral neuroectoderm and undergo stem cell-like, asymmetric divisions, to self-renew and to generate smaller daughter cells, called ganglion mother cells (GMCs). Each GMC divides only
Asymmetric cell division and cancer
Asymmetric cell division is one strategy that stem cells have adopted to control self-renewal and differentiation. Several recent studies in Drosophila indicate that disruption of the molecular machinery regulating asymmetric cell division (including polarity establishment, mitotic spindle orientation and cell fate determinant segregation) may lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation and malignant tumour formation [28], [86], [87]. There is also evidence emerging that some human cancers
Atypical protein kinase C (aPKC)
As mentioned above, aPKC is part of the Par complex and regulates NB polarity. Strikingly, aPKC is also involved in the control of NB self-renewal and differentiation. Lee et al. show that the tumour suppressor Lgl and the polarity cue Pins restrict aPKC to the apical cortex in dividing NBs. lgl, pins double mutants exhibit ectopic cortical localisation of aPKC and a significant increase in the number of larval brain NBs [24]. Similarly, overexpression of a membrane-tethered form of aPKC leads
Role of spindle orientation
Most NBs are generated in the Drosophila embryo and derive from the neuroectoderm. However, optic lobe NBs, which form the visual system of the adult fly, are generated during larval stages. Like embryonic NBs, optic lobe NBs arise from a superficial neuroepithelium [111]. Optic lobe neuroepithelial cells undergo planar symmetric divisions to produce equivalent daughter cells that remain in the epithelium, whereas optic lobe NBs reorient their spindles along the apico-basal axis perpendicular
Conclusion
In the past decade, many advances have been made in uncovering the molecular mechanisms controlling asymmetric cell division. This includes the establishment of polarity, mitotic spindle orientation and the segregation of cell fate determinants. Furthering this understanding of symmetric and asymmetric divisions is important for elucidating stem cell behaviour and has tremendous implications for stem cell biology, stem cell therapy and cancer research.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Brand lab members for discussions and comments to the manuscript. A special thank to Bruno Bello and Heinrich Reichert for contributing unpublished data. PSW and BE are funded by the Cambridge Overseas Trust and the Swiss National Foundation, respectively. This work was funded by a Wellcome Trust Programme grant to AHB.
References (134)
- et al.
Asymmetric distribution of numb protein during division of the sensory organ precursor cell confers distinct fates to daughter cells
Cell
(1994) - et al.
Asymmetric localization and function of cell-fate determinants: a fly's view
Curr Open Neurobiol
(2004) - et al.
Dare to be different: asymmetric cell division in Drosophila, C. elegans and vertebrates
Curr Biol
(2004) - et al.
Asymmetric cell division: fly neuroblast meets worm zygote
Curr Open Cell Biol
(2001) - et al.
Asymmetric cell division
Curr Open Cell Biol
(2004) - et al.
Asymmetric cell division during neurogenesis in Drosophila and vertebrates
Mech Dev
(2003) - et al.
Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric cell division: recent advances and implications for stem cell biology
Neuron
(2006) - et al.
Stem cells and cancer: two faces of eve
Cell
(2006) - et al.
Asymmetric segregation of the tumor suppressor brat regulates self-renewal in Drosophila neural stem cells
Cell
(2006) - et al.
The Drosophila NuMA Homolog Mud regulates spindle orientation in asymmetric cell division
Dev Cell
(2006)
Prospero acts as a binary switch between self-renewal and differentiation in Drosophila neural stem cells
Dev Cell
Brat is a Miranda cargo protein that promotes neuronal differentiation and inhibits neuroblast self-renewal
Dev Cell
The embryonic central nervous system lineages of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Neuroblast lineages derived from the ventral half of the neuroectoderm
Dev Biol
The embryonic central nervous system lineages of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Neuroblast lineages derived from the dorsal part of the neuroectoderm
Dev Biol
Genetic control of Drosophila nerve cord development
Curr Open Neurobiol
Neural stem cells in mammalian development
Curr Open Cell Biol
Control of spindle orientation in Drosophila by the Par-3-related PDZ-domain protein Bazooka
Curr Biol
G proteins direct two modes of asymmetric cell division in the Drosophila nervous system
Cell
Analysis of partner of inscuteable, a novel player of Drosophila asymmetric divisions, reveals two distinct steps in inscuteable apical localization
Cell
Apical complex genes control mitotic spindle geometry and relative size of daughter cells in Drosophila neuroblast and pI asymmetric divisions
Cell
G proteins regulate daughter cell size asymmetry in Drosophila neuroblast divisions
Curr Biol
Microtubule-induced Pins/Galphai cortical polarity in Drosophila neuroblasts
Cell
G proteins and regulation of size asymmetry during cell division
Curr Opin Cell Biol
Molecular control of cell polarity and asymmetric cell division in Drosophila neuroblasts
Curr Opin Cell Biol
RIC-8 is required for GPR-1/2-dependent Galpha function during asymmetric division of C. elegans embryos
Cell
Control of embryonic spindle positioning and Galpha activity by C. elegans RIC-8
Curr Biol
Mammalian Ric-8A (synembryn) is a heterotrimeric Galpha protein guanine nucleotide exchange factor
J Biol Chem
Miranda is required for the asymmetric localization of Prospero during mitosis in Drosophila
Cell
Inscuteable and Staufen mediate asymmetric localization and segregation of prospero RNA during Drosophila neuroblast cell divisions
Cell
Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II promotes the asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants by cortical exclusion rather than active transport
Dev Cell
The Drosophila myosin VI Jaguar is required for basal protein targeting and correct spindle orientation in mitotic neuroblasts
Dev Cell
Stem cell self-renewal: centrosomes on the move
Curr Biol
Functionally unequal centrosomes drive spindle orientation in asymmetrically dividing Drosophila neural stem cells
Dev Cell
The hallmarks of cancer
Cell
The prospero gene specifies cell fates in the Drosophila central nervous system
Cell
Prospero is expressed in neuronal precursors and encodes a nuclear protein that is involved in the control of axonal outgrowth in Drosophila
Cell
The organisation and cell lineage of the ascidian egg
J Acad Natl Sci Philadelphia
The embryology of Clepsine
Quart J Micr Sci
Insights into neural stem cell biology from flies
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci
Asymmetric cell division during animal development
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
Drosophila neural progenitor polarity and asymmetric division
Biol Cell
Asymmetric inheritance of mother versus daughter centrosome in stem cell division
Science
The biology of cancer stem cells
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol
Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer
Nature
The brain tumor gene negatively regulates neural progenitor cell proliferation in the larval central brain of Drosophila
Development
Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster
Nat Genet
Drosophila Pins-binding protein Mud regulates spindle-polarity coupling and centrosome organization
Nat Cell Biol
Drosophila Aurora-A kinase inhibits neuroblast self-renewal by regulating aPKC/Numb cortical polarity and spindle orientation
Genes Dev
Lgl, Pins and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation
Nature
The NuMA-related Mud protein binds Pins and regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts
Nat Cell Biol
Cited by (48)
Re-visiting the principles of apicobasal polarity in Drosophila neural stem cells
2022, Developmental BiologyDevelopment of the Drosophila melanogaster embryonic CNS
2020, Patterning and Cell Type Specification in the Developing CNS and PNS: Comprehensive Developmental Neuroscience, Second EditionFrom the Eye to the Brain. Development of the Drosophila Visual System
2016, Current Topics in Developmental BiologyCitation Excerpt :The molecular mechanisms involved in such divisions from the neuroblast to the GMCs have been well characterized and reviewed in Homem and Knoblich (2012), Kang and Reichert (2015), and Sousa-Nunes and Somers (2013). Importantly, neuroblasts express Deadpan (Dpn), GMCs express Prospero (Pros), and both express Asense (Ase) (Brand & Livesey, 2011; Egger, Chell, & Brand, 2008; Egger et al., 2011; Reichert, 2011; Southall & Brand, 2009; Wu, Egger, & Brand, 2008). In recent years, examples that differ from such classic models have been characterized.
The BASL Polarity Protein Controls a MAPK Signaling Feedback Loop in Asymmetric Cell Division
2015, Developmental CellCitation Excerpt :One of the most conserved fundamental mechanisms underlying ACD in animals is described by the intrinsic polarity model (Inaba and Yamashita, 2012; Yu et al., 2006). In the process of neuroblast ACD in Drosophila, the Par polarity complex is localized asymmetrically to the apical cortex of the neuroblast and drives a set of fate-determining factors to the opposite side to determine the asymmetric cell fates (Inaba and Yamashita, 2012; Knoblich, 2008; Prehoda, 2009; Wu et al., 2008). ACD is critical for plant growth and development since new cell types, tissues, and even entire organs are continuously produced from a limited number of stem cells (De Smet and Beeckman, 2011; Petricka et al., 2009).
Development of the Drosophila Embryonic Ventral Nerve Cord: From Neuroectoderm to Unique Neurons and Glia
2013, Comprehensive Developmental Neuroscience: Patterning and Cell Type Specification in the Developing CNS and PNSThe par complex and integrins direct asymmetric cell division in adult intestinal stem cells
2012, Cell Stem CellCitation Excerpt :How asymmetric cell division is controlled in Drosophila adult somatic stem cells, however, is not understood. During development, neuroblasts undergo repeated rounds of asymmetric divisions, creating neurons in a highly stereotyped lineage (Doe, 2008; Wu et al., 2008; Knoblich, 2008). They arise from a polarized epithelium from which they delaminate while maintaining the apical localization of the so-called Par complex, consisting of the adaptor proteins Bazooka (Baz; Drosophila homolog of Par-3), Par-6, and the protein kinase aPKC (Suzuki and Ohno, 2006).
- 1
These authors contribute equally to the work.