Elsevier

Surgery

Volume 143, Issue 2, February 2008, Pages 181-183
Surgery

Innovation by Surgeon
Tissue engineering: From bench to bedside via commercialization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.11.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Laboratory history of tissue engineering and corporate involvement

While a young assistant professor of surgery at Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School in 1985, I came to the realization that the organ shortage would be my biggest problem in pediatric liver transplantation and that it was a specific manifestation of the general problem in all areas of reconstructive surgery—the lack of sufficient tissue for reconstruction. Based on my years of work with Dr Judah Folkman and his seminal observations in angiogenesis, I developed the idea of

Conflict of interest and other issues related to the interface of academia and industry

Conflict of interest guidelines have become an important safeguard to keep the welfare of the patient as the top priority for the introduction of any new technology. Harvard, MIT, and MGH have very similar guidelines in this regard. In clinical research, physicians cannot be responsible for clinical trials and cannot have any financial interest in the corporate entities that can derive financial benefit from the successful introduction of a technology. These principles ensure a clear separation

References (0)

Cited by (14)

  • Commercialization and regulation of regenerative medicine products: Promises, advances and challenges

    2022, Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    For example, industry often complains that working with Universities slows down commercialization and there is still a general feeling (although decreasing) that academics should not be working with industry (specifically, for-profit entities) with proprietary needs. To create the optimal regenerative medicine industry, concepts (such as determining the purpose of research, providing research tools, in vivo evaluation of products, and their clinical performance) should be done in direct cooperation with industry and academia [51]. As shown in Table 4, the number of TE companies, especially in the US, is growing [52].

  • Fetal Tissue Engineering

    2009, Clinics in Perinatology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Indeed, many firms driven by an initial substantial interest in tissue engineering have exited the market over the last 5 to 10 years. Still, dozens of companies continue to invest in the development of new products.92,93 It seems that a healthy partnership between academia and industry should be the best option to further expand tissue engineering into clinical reality, a principle that appears to be particularly relevant to fetal tissue engineering, given its sources purely in academia and its sizeable target market, not to mention the perspective of prolonged fetal cell banking.

  • Translation to success of surgical innovation

    2010, European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
  • Research in pediatric surgery

    2018, Rickham's neonatal surgery
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text