Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T20:06:34.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Circadian flight activity in four sibling species of the Anopheles gambiae complex (Diptera, Culicidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. D. R. Jones ,
S. J. Gubbins  and
C. M. Cubbin
M. D. R. Jones
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, England
S. J. Gubbins
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, England
C. M. Cubbin
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middx, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Circadian flight activity in the males and females of Anopheles gambiae Giles species A and B, A. melas (Theo.) and A. merus Dön. has been investigated using the acoustic actograph technique. In each species the pattern and timing of activity in males and females is almost identical. Cyclical activity continues in constant dark; the period of the cycle is approximately half-an-hour shorter in A. gambiae species A and half-an-hour longer in A. merus than in the other two species. In alternating 12 h light: 12 h dark, both sexes are active during the dark period, with peaks of activity following light-off and light-on. After light-off, the species become active in the following order: A. gambiae species A, A. melas, A. gambiae species B, A. merus. A. merus is approximately 20 min later than species A.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 241 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davidson, G. (1969 a). The potential use of sterile hybrid males for the eradication of member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 40, 221–228.Google ScholarPubMed
Davidson, G. (1969 b). Genetical control of Anopheles gambiae.—Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Entomol. méd. Parasitol. 7, 151–154.Google Scholar
Davidson, G., Odetoyinbo, J. A., Colussa, B. & Coz, J. (1970). A field attempt to assess the mating competitiveness of sterile males produced by crossing 2 member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 42, 55–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Davidson, G., Paterson, H. E., Coluzzi, M., Mason, G. F. & Micks, D. W. (1967). The Anopheles gambiae complex. In Wright, J. W. and Pal, R. (Eds) Genetics of insect vectors of disease, pp. 211–250. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Jones, M. D. R. (1973). Delayed effect of light on the mosquito ‘ clock ’.—Nature, Lond. 245, 384–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, M. D. R. (1974). Inversion polymorphism and circadian flight activity in the mosquito Anopheles stephensi (Diptera, Culicidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. D. R., Cubbin, C. M. & Marsh, D. (1972 a). The circadian rhythm of flight activity of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae: the light-response rhythm.—J. exp. Biol. 57, 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. D. R., Cubbin, C. M. & Marsh, D. (1972 b). Light-on effects and the question of bimodality in the circadian flight activity of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae.—J. exp. Biol. 57, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. D. R., Hill, M. & Hope, A. M. (1967). The circadian flight activity of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae: phase setting by the light regime.—J. exp. Biol. 47, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahn, M. C. & Offenhauser, W. Jr. (1949). The first field tests of recorded mosquito sounds used for mosquito destruction.—Am. J. trap. Med. 29, 811–825.Google ScholarPubMed
Nijhout, H. F. & Craig, G. B. Jr. (1971). Reproductive isolation in Stegomyia mosquitoes. III. Evidence for a sexual pheromone.—Entomologia exp. appl. 14, 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, L. M. (1948). A study of mosquito behavior. An experimental laboratory study of the sexual behavior of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus).—Am. Midi. Nat. 40, 265–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and procedures of statistics, with special reference to the biological sciences.—pp. 107–109. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
White, G. B. (1971). Chromosomal evidence for natural interspecific hybridization by mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae complex.—Nature, Lond. 231, 184–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed