Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:04:17.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

John P. Aggleton
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF1 3YG, Walesaggleton@cardiff.ac.uk www.cf.ac.uk/uwc/psych/
Malcolm W. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, United Kingdomm.w.brown@bristol.ac.uk

Abstract

By utilizing new information from both clinical and experimental (lesion, electrophysiological, and gene-activation) studies with animals, the anatomy underlying anterograde amnesia has been reformulated. The distinction between temporal lobe and diencephalic amnesia is of limited value in that a common feature of anterograde amnesia is damage to part of an “extended hippocampal system” comprising the hippocampus, the fornix, the mamillary bodies, and the anterior thalamic nuclei. This view, which can be traced back to Delay and Brion (1969), differs from other recent models in placing critical importance on the efferents from the hippocampus via the fornix to the diencephalon. These are necessary for the encoding and, hence, the effective subsequent recall of episodic memory. An additional feature of this hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis is the presence of projections back from the diencephalon to the temporal cortex and hippocampus that also support episodic memory. In contrast, this hippocampal system is not required for tests of item recognition that primarily tax familiarity judgements. Familiarity judgements reflect an independent process that depends on a distinct system involving the perirhinal cortex of the temporal lobe and the medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus. In the large majority of amnesic cases both the hippocampal–anterior thalamic and the perirhinal–medial dorsal thalamic systems are compromised, leading to severe deficits in both recall and recognition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)