Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative binding of antibody to a mate recognition pheromone on female Brachionus plicatilis and Brachionus rotundiformis (Rotifera)

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work of Kazutsugu Hirayama over the past 25 yearspromoted the wide use of the marine rotifer Brachionusplicatilis as an experimental model in zooplanktonecology. His reports about the nature of geneticvariation in the B. plicatilis complex stimulated usto investigate how mate recognition maintains speciesboundaries. For the past several years, we haveexamined chemical communication between female andmale B. plicatilis. Here we report on the comparativebinding of polyclonal antibody against the materecognition pheromone (MRP) to three B. plicatilisstrains and three B. rotundiformis strains.Quantification of anti-MRP binding permitsinvestigation of how the female mating signal differsamong closely related Brachionus species and strains.Antibody binding reflects differentiation independentof the male receptor which has been describedelsewhere. Anti-MRP bound to females of all sixstrains and was localized in the corona. Antibodybinding greatly reduced mating in all three B. plicatilis strains. However, antibody bindingsignificantly reduced mating in only one of the B. rotundiformis strains. The MRP of both species has asimilar molecular weight, but the differential bindingsuggests that the mate recognition pheromone onfemales has differentiated in B. plicatilis and B. rotundiformis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fu, Y. & K. Hirayama, 1990. Strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis having particular patterns of isozymes. Proceedings of the Second Asian Fisheries Forum: 177–180.

  • Fu, Y., K. Hirayama & Y. Natsukari, 1991a. Morphological differences between two types of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 151: 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., K. Hirayama & Y. Natsukari, 1991b. Genetic differences between S and L type strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 151: 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., A. Hagiwara & K. Hirayama, 1993. Crossing between seven strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 59: 2009–2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, A. & M. Serra, 1995. Behavioral reproductive isolation among sympatric strains of Brachionus plicatilisMüller 1786: insights into the status of this taxonomic species. Hydrobiologia 313/314: 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi, S. R., 1994. Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 547–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martónez, R. & T. W. Snell, 1995a. Mating behavior and mate recognition pheromone blocking of male receptors in Brachionus plicatilisMuller (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 313/314: 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martínez, R. & T. W. Snell, 1995b. Male discrimination of female Brachionus plicatilisand Brachionus rotundiformis Tschugunoff (Rotifera). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 190: 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Martínez, R., 1996. Contribution to the Knowledge of Speciation in the Rotifera. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia. UMI #9614135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumengan, I. F. M. & K. Hirayama, 1990. Growth responses of genetically distinct S and L type rotifer (Brachionus plicatilis) strains to different temperatures. Proceedings of Second Asian Fisheries Forum: 37–40.

  • Rumengan, I. F. M., H. Kayano & K. Hirayama, 1991. Karyotypes of S and L type rotifers Brachionus plicatilisO. F. Müller. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 154: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, H., 1995. Nomenclature consequences of some recent studies on Brachionus plicatilis(Rotifera, Brachionidae). Hydrobiologia 313/314: 121–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & C. A. Hawkinson, 1983. Behavioral reproductive isolation among populations of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Evolution 37: 1294–1305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & F. H. Hoff, 1987. Fertilization and male fertility in the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Hydrobiologia 147: 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W., P. D. Morris & G. Cecchine, 1993. Localization of the mate recognition pheromone Brachionus plicatilisO. F. Müller (Rotifera) by fluorescent labeling with lectins. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 165: 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W., R. Rico-Martínez, L. N. Kelly & T. E. Battle, 1995. Identification of a sex pheromone from a rotifer. Mar. Biol. 123: 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry (2nd edn). W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 776 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rico-Martínez, R., Snell, T.W. Comparative binding of antibody to a mate recognition pheromone on female Brachionus plicatilis and Brachionus rotundiformis (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 358, 71–76 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003121531835

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003121531835

Navigation