Skip to main content
Log in

Confirmation of an Inhibitory Control Deficit in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether deficient inhibitory control distinguishes children with a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity (ADHD) disorder, conduct disorder (CD), and comorbid ADHD + CD from normally developing children. Participants were rigorously diagnosed children (age 7 to 12 years) with ADHD (N = 72), CD (N = 13) or ADHD + CD (N = 47) and 33 control children (NC). We studied inhibitory control using the stop-signal paradigm, a laboratory task that assessed the ability to inhibit an ongoing action. The ADHD group had significantly impaired inhibitory control compared to NC, CD, and ADHD + CD children. These results indicate that children with ADHD have deficient inhibition as measured in the stop-signal paradigm and that ADHD occurring in the presence of ADHD + CD may represent a phenocopy of CD rather than a variant of ADHD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abikoff, H., Courtney, M., & Koplewicz, H. (1991). Halo Effects and Teachers' Ratings of Children's Classroom Behavior. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, San Francisco.

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Band, G. P. H. (1997). Preparation, adjustment, and inhibition of responses. University of Amsterdam: The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A. (1997a). ADHD and the nature of self-control. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A. (1997b). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron, C., & Rutter, M. (1991). Comorbidity in child psychopathology: Concepts, issues and research strategies. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 32, 1063–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denckla, M. B. (1996). Research on executive function in a neurodevelopmental context: Application of clinical measures. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I. (1972). Stop, Look and Listen: The problem of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 4, 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I. (1988). Attention deficit disorder: Criteria, cognition, intervention. In L. M. Bloomingdale & J. Sergeant (Eds.), Cognitive deficits in children with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (pp. 65–81). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraone, S. V., Biederman, J., Keenan, K., & Tsuang, M. T. (1991). Separation of DSM-III attention deficit disorder and conduct disorder: Evidence from a family-genetic study of American child psychiatric patients. Psychological Medicine, 21, 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, J. R., van der Molen, M. W., Brock, K., & Somsen, R. J. (1992). On the synchrony of stopping motor responses and delaying heartbeats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 422–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1985). On the Ability to Inhibit Simple Thoughts and Actions: II Stop-Signal Studies of Repetition Priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 675–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users' guide to the stop signal paradigm. In T. H. Dagenbach & D. Carr (Eds.), Inhibirtory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189–239). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: A Theory of an Act of Control. Psychological Review, 91, 295–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., Cowan, W. B., & Davis, K. A. (1984). On the Ability to Inhibit Simple and Choice Reaction Time Responses: A Model and a Method. Journal of Experiemental Psychology, 10, 276–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. T. (1997). Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science, 8, 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., & Keiras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic processes. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (1993). Biostatistics: The bare essentials. Toronto: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offord, D. R., Boyle, M. H., Szatmari, P., Rae-Grant, N. I., Links, P. S., Cadman, D. T., Byles, J. A., Crawford, J. W., Blum, H. M., & Byrne, C. (1987). Ontario Child Health Study. II. Six-month prevalence of disorder and rates of service utilization. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 832–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollman, R. T. (1973). Simple reactions with random countermanding of the “go” signal. In S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and Performance Vol. IV (pp. 571–581). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterlaan, J., Logan, G. D., & Sergeant, J. A. (1998). Response Inhibition in AD/HD, CD, Comorbid AD/HDCCD, Anxious, and Control Children: A Meta-analysis of Studies with the Stop Task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, A., Kornblum, S., & Meyer, D. E. (1986). The point of no return in choice reaction time: Controlled and ballistic stagesd of response preparation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 37, 51–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, K. L., & Tannock, R. (in press). Phonological processing, not inhibitory control, differentiates ADHD and reading disability. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

  • Quay, H. C. (1997). Inhibition and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., & Logan, G. D. (1990). Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 26, 710–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., Sandberg, S., & Rutter, M. (1986). Agreement between teachers' ratings and observations of hyperactivity, inattentiveness, and defiance. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 331–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., & Tannock, R. (1995). Test of four hypotheses for the comorbidity of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 639–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., Tannock, R., Marriott, M., & Logan, G. (1995). Deficient inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 411–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergeant, J. A., & Van der Meere, J. J. (1990). Converging approaches on localizing the hyperactivity deficit. In B. B. Lahey & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology Vol. 13 (pp. 207–245), New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szatmari, P., Offord, D. R., & Boyle, M. H. (1989). Ontario Child Health Study: Prevalence of attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 30, 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidel, L. S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannock, R., Schachar, R. J., Carr, R. P., Chajczyk, D., & Logan, G. D. (1989). Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 473–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuang, M. T., Faraone, S. V., & Lyons, M. J. (1993). Identification of the phenotype in psychiatric genetics. European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, 243, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B., Ponesse, J., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (1999). Development of inhibitory control across the lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 35, 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Read Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schachar, R., Mota, V.L., Logan, G.D. et al. Confirmation of an Inhibitory Control Deficit in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 28, 227–235 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005140103162

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005140103162

Navigation