Skip to main content
Log in

Using Focus Groups to Develop a Heart Disease Prevention Program for Ethnically Diverse, Low-Income Women

  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although low-income women have higher rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than higher-income women, health promotion and disease prevention are often low priorities due to financial, family, and health care constraints. In addition, most low-income women live in environments that tend to support and even promote high risk CVD behaviors. Low-income African-American, Hispanic, and White women constitute one of the largest groups at high risk for CVD but few heart disease prevention programs have effectively reached them. The purpose of this project was to use feedback from focus groups to generate ideas about how to best structure and implement future CVD intervention programs tailored to low-income populations. Seven focus groups were conducted with 51 low-income African-American, Hispanic, and White women from two urban and two agricultural communities in California. The women in the study shared many common experiences and barriers to healthy lifestyles, despite their ethnic diversity. Results of the focus groups showed that women preferred heart disease prevention programs that would address multiple CVD risk factors, emphasize staying healthy for themselves, teach specific skills about how to adopt heart-healthy behaviors, and offer them choices in effecting behavioral change. For health information, they preferred visual formats to written formats. They also expressed a desire to develop knowledge to help them separate health “myths” from health “facts” in order to reduce their misconceptions about CVD. Finally, they stressed that health care policies and programs need to address social and financial barriers that impede the adoption of heart-healthy behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Winkleby M.A. The future of community-based cardiovascular disease intervention studies. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1369-1372

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan G.A., Keil J.E. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation 1993;88:1973-1998

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Report of the Conference on Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Health and Disease (November 6–7, 1995). Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Public Health Service; 1995

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adler N.E., Boyce T., Chesney M., Folkman S., Syme L. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: no easy solution. JAMA 1993;269:3140-3145

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marmot M.G., McDowall M.E. Mortality decline and widening social inequalities. Lancet 1986;ii: 274-276

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pappas G., Queen S., Hadden W., Fisher G. The increasing disparity in mortality between socioeconomic groups in the United States, 1960 and 1986. N Engl J Med 1993;329:103-109

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winkleby M.A., Feldman H.A., Murray D.M. Joint analysis of three U.S. community intervention trials for reduction of cardiovascular disease risk. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:148-158

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carleton R.A., Lasater T.M., Assaf A.R., Feldman H.A., McKinlay S. The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: community changes in cardiovascular risk factors and projected disease risk. Am J Public Health 1995;85:777-785

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farquhar J.W., Fortmann S.P., Flora J.A., et al. Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Stanford Five-City Project. JAMA 1990;264:359-365

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luepker R.V., Murray D.M., Jacobs D.R., Jr., et al. Community education for cardiovascular disease prevention: Risk factor changes in the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1383-1393

    Google Scholar 

  11. Winkleby M.A., Flora J.A., Kraemer H.C. A community-based heart disease intervention: predictors of change. Am J Public Health 1994;84:767-772

    Google Scholar 

  12. Winkleby M.A., Kraemer H.C., Ahn D.K., Varady A.N. Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors: findings for women from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. JAMA 1998;280:356-362

    Google Scholar 

  13. Winkleby M.A. Accelerating cardiovascular risk factor change in ethnic minority and low socioeconomic groups. Ann Epidemiol 1997;7:S96-S103

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aguirre-Molina M., Molina C.W. Latino populations: who are they? In: Molina C.W., Aguirre-Molina M., eds. Latino Health in the U.S.: A Growing Challenge. Washington D.C.: American Public Health Association; 1994

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blackburn H. Community programmes in coronary heart disease prevention and health promotion: changing community behaviour. In: Marmot M., Elliott P., eds. Coronary Heart Disease Epidemiology New York: Oxford University Press; 1992

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mein S., Winkleby M.A. Concerns and misconceptions about cardiovascular disease risk factors: a focus group evaluation with low income Hispanic women. Hisp J Behav Sci 1998;20:192-211

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shea S., Basch C.E., Lantigua R., Wechsler H. The Washington Heights-Inwood Healthy Heart Program: A third generation community-based cardiovascular disease prevention program in a disadvantaged urban setting. Prev Med 1992;21:203-217

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson K.W., Anderson N.B., Bastida E., Kramer J., Williams D., Wong M. Macrosocial and environmental influences on minority health. Health Psych 1995;14:601-612

    Google Scholar 

  19. Howard-Pitney B., Winkleby M.A., Albright C.L., Bruce B., Fortmann S.P. The Stanford Nutrition Action Program: a dietary fat intervention for low literate adults. Am J Public Health 1997;87: 1971-1976

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.; 1996

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freudenberg N., Eng E., Flay B., Parcel G., Rogers T., Wallerstein N. Strengthening individual and community capacity to prevent disease and promote health: in search of relevant theories and principles. Health Educ Q 1995;22:290-306

    Google Scholar 

  22. Braithwaite R.L., Lythcott N. Community empowerment as a strategy for health promotion for black and other minority populations. JAMA 1989;261:282-283

    Google Scholar 

  23. Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum; 1993

    Google Scholar 

  24. Israel B., Checkoway B., Schulz A., Zimmerman M. Health education and community empowerment: conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual organizations and community control. Health Educ Q 1994;21:149-170

    Google Scholar 

  25. Green L.W. The theory of participation: A qualitative analysis of its expression in national and international health policies. Advances in Health Education and Promotion 1986;1(A):211-236

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mittelmark M.B., Hunt M.K., Heath G.W., Schmid T.L. Realistic outcomes: lessons from community-based research and demonstration programs for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. J Public Health Policy 1993;14:437-462

    Google Scholar 

  27. Basch C.E. Focus group interviews: An underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education Quarterly 1987;14:411-448

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buttram J.L. Focus groups: a starting point for needs assessment. Evaluation Practice 1990;11: 207-212

    Google Scholar 

  29. Holman H.R. Qualitative inquiry in medical research. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:29-36

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maillet N.A., Melkus D.A., Spollett G. Using focus groups to characterize the health beliefs and practices of black women with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes Educator 1996;22:39-42

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morgan D.L. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stewart D. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1990

    Google Scholar 

  33. Quatromoni P.A., Milbauer M., Posner B.M., Carballeira N.P., Brunt M., Chipkin S.R. Use of focus groups to explore nutrition practices and health beliefs of urban Caribbean Latinos with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1994;17:869-873

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fortmann S.P., Flora J.A., Winkleby M.A., Schooler C., Taylor C.B., Farquhar J.W. Community intervention trials: reflections on the Stanford Five-City Project Experience. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142:576-586

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lenfant C. A new challenge for America: the National Cholesterol Education Program. Circulation 1986;73:855-856

    Google Scholar 

  36. National Heart and Lung Institute. Proceedings from the National Conference on High Blood Pressure Education. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1973, NIH 73-486

    Google Scholar 

  37. Paradis G., O'Loughlin J., Elliot M., et al. Coeur en Sante St. Henri: a heart health promotion programme in a low income, low education neighbourhood in Montreal, Canada: theoretical model and early field experience. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1995;49:503-512

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shea S., Basch C.E., Wechsler H., Lantigua R. The Washington Heights-Inwood Healthy Heart Program: A 6-year report from a disadvantaged urban setting. Am J Public Health 1996;86:166-171

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wechsler H., Wernick S.M. A social marketing campaign to promote low-fat milk consumption in an inner city Latino community. Public Health Rep 1992;107:202-207

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yancey A.K., Tanjasiri S.P., Klein M., Thunder J. Increased cancer screening behavior in women of color by culturally sensitive video exposure. Prev Med 1995;24:142-148

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nader P.R., Sallis J.F., Patterson T.L., et al. A family approach to cardiovascular risk reduction: results from the San Diego Family Health Project. Health Ed Quart 1989;16:229-244

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zimmerman M.A., Rappaport J. Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment Am J Community Psychol 1988;16:725-750

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wallerstein N., Bernstein E. Introduction to community empowerment, participatory education, and health. Health Educ Q 1994;21:141-148

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gettleman, L., Winkleby, M.A. Using Focus Groups to Develop a Heart Disease Prevention Program for Ethnically Diverse, Low-Income Women. Journal of Community Health 25, 439–453 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005155329922

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005155329922

Navigation