Skip to main content
Log in

Methods for estimating HIV prevalence: A comparison of extrapolation from surveys on infection rate and risk behaviour with back-calculation for the Netherlands

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: To compare HIV prevalence estimates (total number infected) by using extrapolation from surveys on infection rate and risk behaviour (EIR) in specific segments of the population and back-calculation (BC) on reported AIDS cases. To discuss potential sources of bias and error, and to identify areas for improvement of the methodology. Design: Systematic comparison and epidemiological assessment of data input, underlying assumptions, and output. Methods: Low, possibly unbiased and high estimates of HIV prevalence as of January 1996 for homo/bisexual men, injecting drug users, heterosexual men and women with multiple partners, and blood transfusion recipients and haemophiliacs were derived from surveys and continuous data collections on HIV infection rate and risk behaviour in the Netherlands between 1992 and 1996. These were compared with estimates (point and 95% CI) by empirical Bayesian BC on AIDS cases 1982–1995. Results and conclusions: The estimate of HIV prevalence by EIR was 13,806 with low and high estimates of 9619 and 17,700, respectively. The HIV prevalence estimate by BC was 8812 (95% CI: 7759–9867). The available data from EIR are too limited for accurate estimates of HIV prevalence. EIR estimates could be improved considerably with more precise data on prevalence of risk behaviours and HIV prevalence rate for homosexual men. More confidence can be put in the BC estimates, but these could be underestimates because of the age effect on incubation time, pre-AIDS treatment and relapse of risk behaviour. BC estimates could be improved by a better representation of the incubation time distribution (including the effect of age thereupon), better data on the effectiveness and uptake of pre-AIDS antiretroviral treatment and prophylaxis of opportunistic infections, and on the level of underreporting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buehler JW, De Cock KM, Brunet JB. Surevillance definitions for AIDS. AIDS 1993; 7(Suppl 1): S73–S81.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mertens TE, Burton A, Stoneburner R, et al. Global estimates and epidemiology of HIV infections and AIDS. AIDS 1994; 8(Suppl 1): S361–372.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Report of a working Group. The incidence and prevalence of AIDS and other severe HIV disease in England and Wales for 1992–1997: Projections using data to the end of June 1992. Communicable Disease Report 1993; 3(Suppl 1): S1–S17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giesecke J, Johnson A, Hawkins A, et al. An estimate of the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in England and Wales by using a direct method. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1994; 157: 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Duynhoven YTHP, Houweling H, Wiessing LG, Esveld MI, Nieste HLJ, Katchaki JN. Laboratory-based HIV surveillance with information on exposure: Importance of discriminating person-based from test-based results. Intern J STD AIDS 1996; 7: 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hull H, Bettinger C, Gallaher M, Keller N, Wilson J, Mertz G. Comparison of HIV-antibody prevalence in patients consenting and declining HIV-antibody testing in an STD clinic. JAMA 1988; 260: 935–938.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones JL, Hutto P, Meyer P, Dowda H, Gamble WB, Gunn RA. HIV seroprevalence and reasons for refusing and accepting HIV testing. Sex Transm Dis 1993; 20: 334–337.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Groseclose SL, Erickson B, Quinn TC, Glasser D, Campbell CH, Hook EW. Characterization of patients accepting and refusing routine, voluntary HIV antibody testing in public health sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Sex Transm Dis 1994; 21: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Postema EJ, Willems PWJM, de Ridder MAJ, van der Meijden WI. Comparison of patients refusing with patients accepting anonymous HIV testing in an outpatient STD department in the Netherlands. Intern J STD AIDS, 1997; 8: 368–72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fennema JSA, van Ameijden EJC, Henquet CJM, van Doornum GJJ, Coutinho RA, van den Hoek JAR. HIV-surveillance op een polikliniek voor seksueel overdraagbare aandoeningen in Amsterdam, 1991–94: lage en stabiele prevalentic onder heteroseksucle bezockers. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1995; 139: 1595–1598.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wiessing LG, Houweling H, Sandfort ThGM, Schop W, Bosga MB, van den Akker R. HIV-infectie in een Nederlandse groep homoseksuele mannen. Report nr. 529002001. Bilthoven: National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Houweling H. HIV prevalence in selected populations, and selection by setting and study design compared to all people in category, the Netherlands: Amsterdam and outside, 1981–1997. In: Houweling H, Public health surveillance of AIDS and HIV infection in the Netherlands and Europe (thesis University of Amsterdam). Delft: Eburon Publishers, 1997: 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hemofilie en AIDS. Badhoevedorp: Nederlandse Vereniging van Hemofilie-patiënten, 1994.

  14. Veugelers PJ, van Zessen G, Hendriks JCM, Sandfort TGM, Coutinho RA, van Griensven GJP. Estimation of the magnitude of the HIV epidemic among homosexual men: utilization of survey data in predictive models. Eur J Epidemiol 1993; 9: 436–441.

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Zessen G, Sandfort T, eds. Seksualiteit in Nederland; seksueel gedrag, risico en preventie van AIDS. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Driessen FMHM. Methadonverstrekking in Nederland. Rijswijk/Utrecht: Bureau Driessen, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. van Brussel GHA, van Lieshout SJM. Jaarverslag drugsafdeling 1992. Amsterdam: Municipal Health Service, Department of Mental Health, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Downs AM, Heisterkamp SH, Brunet JB, Hamers FF. Reconstruction and prediction of the HIV/AIDS epidemic among adults in the European Union and in the low prevalence countries of central and eastern Europe. AIDS 1997; 11: 649–62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heisterkamp SH, Jager JC, Ruitenberg EJ, et al. Correcting reported AIDS incidence: A statistical approach. Stat Med 1989; 8: 963–976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heisterkamp SH, Downs AM, van Houwelingen JC. Empirical Bayesian estimators for reconstruction of HIV incidence and prevalence and forecasting of AIDS; method of estimation. In: Quantitative analysis of AIDS/HIV: development of methods to support policy making for infectious disease control. Thesis University of Leiden, 1995.

  21. Hendriks JCM, Satten GA, Longini IM, van Druten HAM, Schellekens PT, Coutinho RA. Use of immunological markers and continuous-time Markov models to estimate progression of HIV infection in homosexual men. AIDS 1996; 10: 649–56.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hendriks JCM, Satten GA, van Ameijden EJC, van Druten HAM, Coutinho RA, van Griensven GJP. The incubation period to AIDS among injecting drug users estimated from prevalent cohort data, accounting for death prior to an AIDS diagnosis. AIDS (In press).

  23. Houweling H, Hamers FF, Termorshuizen F, Gill ON, Jager JC, Coutinho RA. A birth cohort analysis of AIDS in Europe: High incidence among young persons at risk. AIDS 1998; 12: 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Multicohorl Analysis Project. Immunological markers of AIDS progression: Consistency across five HIV-infected cohorts: Multicohort Analysis Project Workshop, part 1. AIDS 1994; 8: 911–921.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Veugelers PJ, van Zessen G, Sandfort ThGM, Cornelisse-Claassen TM, van Griensven GJP. Seksualitcit en risicogedrag van Amsterdamse mannen. Tijdsehrift voor Sociale Gezondheidszorg 1992; 70: 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  26. College voor de Bloedtransfusie. Overzicht van de bloedtransfusie in Nederland, 1995. Amsterdam: College voor de Bloedtransfusie of the Netherlands Red Cross, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Houweling H, Termorshuizen F, Bindels PJE, van Wijngaarden JK. The AIDS epidemic in the Netherlands 1982–1996. In: Houweling H, Public health surveillance of AIDS and HIV infection in the Netherlands and Europe (thesis University of Amsterdam). Delft: Eburon Publishers, 1997: 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  28. van Griensven GJP, de Vroome EMM, Goudsmit J, Coutinho RA. Changes in sexual behaviour and the fall in incidence of HIV infection among homosexual men. Br Med J 1989; 298: 218–221.

    Google Scholar 

  29. van den Hoek JAR, Coutinho RA, van Haastrecht HJA, van Zadelhof AW, Goudsmit J. Prevalence and risk factors of HIV infections among drug users and drug-using prostitutes in Amsterdam. AIDS 1988; 2: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gibbs DA, Hamill DN, Magruder-Habib K. Populations at increased risk of HIV infection: Current knowledge and limitations. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1991; 4: 881–889.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jager JC, Heisterkamp SH, Brookmeyer R: AIDS surveillance and prediction of the HIV and AIDS epidemic: Methodological developments. AIDS 1993; 7(Suppl 1): S67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brookmeyer R, Gail MH. Back-calculation. In: AIDS Epidemiology, a quantitative approach. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The incidence and prevalence of AIDS and other severe HIV disease in England and Wales for 1992–1997; projections using data to the end of June 1992. Comm Dis Rep 1993; 3(Suppl 1): S1–17.

  34. van Haastrecht HJA, van den Hoek JAR, Coutinho RA. High mortality among HIV-infected injecting drug users without AIDS diagnosis: Implications for HIV-infection modellers? AIDS 1994; 8: 363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Seydel J, Krämer, Rosenberg PS, Wittkowski KM, Gail MH. Backcalculation of the number infected with human immunodeficiency virus in Germany. J Aequir Immune Defic Syndr 1994; 7: 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bacchetti P, Segal MR, Hessol NA, Jewell NP. Different AIDS incubation periods and their impact on reconstructing human immunodeficiency virus epidemics and projecting AIDS incidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 2194–2196.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pezzotti P, Phillips AN, Dorrucci M, et al. Category of exposure to HIV and age in the progression to AIDS: Longitudinal study of 1199 people with known dates of seroconversion. Br Med J 1996; 313: 583–6.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Spijkerman IJB, Langendam MW, Veugelers PJ, et al. Differences in progression to AIDS between injection drug users and homosexual men with documented dates of seroconversion. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 571–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hoover DR. The effects of long term zidovudine therapy and Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis on HIV disease; a review of the literature. Drugs 1995; 49: 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Termorshuizen F, Houweling H. HIV/aids in Nederland: Betere behandelingsmogelijkheden maken HIV-in plaats van aidssurveillance noodzakelijk. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1997; 141: 1928–9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. de Wit JBF, van den Hoek JAR, Sandfort ThGM, van Griensven GJP. Increase in unprotected anogenital intercourse among homosexual men. Am J Publ Health 1993; 83: 1451–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hoover DR, Muñoz A, Carey V, et al. Estimating the 1978–1990 and future spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in subgroups of homosexual men. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 1190–1205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houweling, H., Heisterkamp, S.H., Wiessing, L.G. et al. Methods for estimating HIV prevalence: A comparison of extrapolation from surveys on infection rate and risk behaviour with back-calculation for the Netherlands. Eur J Epidemiol 14, 645–652 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007495607520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007495607520

Navigation