Abstract
After third grade of elementary school, native Hebrew speakers in Israel gradually become expert in reading two kinds of writing systems: the one they start with that contains signs for every phoneme of the spoken language, and another, to which they are steadily introduced, beginning with the second grade, which omits most vowels, together with few consonantal distinctions. Earlier studies indicate that single voweled words are read faster than unvoweled words, particularly in a naming task. This study examined another possible contribution of vowel signs in reading Hebrew: Its effect on memory and comprehension. It was assumed that if subvocalization facilitates memory of words while reading, and if vowel signs facilitate phonological processing, as is perhaps the case in naming tasks, then vowelization may intensify the processing of the articulatory loop and this should improve memory and comprehension. Our first two experiments assessed the contribution of vowel signs to the memory of word lists in either recognition memory or word recall tasks. The third experiment examined the contribution of vowel signs to the reading of connected texts. We found that vowel signs speeded up recognition memory of words in third graders, and improved the recall of words printed in the context of mixed lists in sixth graders. We also found that vowelization improved memory and comprehension of some prose texts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A.D. (1978). Working memory and reading. In: P. Kolers, E.Wrolstad & H. Bouma (eds.), Processing visual language, Vol. 1 (pp. 355–370). New York: Plenum Press.
Baddeley, A.D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baddeley, A.D., Eldridge, M. & Lewis, V.J. (1981). The role of subvocalization in reading, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology33: 439–454.
Baddeley, A.D. & Hitch, G.T. (1974).Working memory. In: G.H. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 8 (pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Bentin, S. & Feldman, L.B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology42A: 693–711.
Bentin, S. & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography, Memory and Cognition15: 13–23.
Bentin, S. & Frost, R. (1995). Morphological factors in visual word identification in Hebrew. In: L.B. Feldman (ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing(pp. 271–292). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Berent I. & Shimron, J. (1998). The representation of Hebrew Words: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle, Cognition64: 39–72.
Berman, R.A. (1980). Child language as evidence for grammatical description: Preschoolers' construal of transitivity in the verb system of Hebrew, Linguistics18: 677–701.
Berman, R.A. (1982). Verb pattern alternation: The interface of morphology, syntax, and semantics in Hebrew child language, Journal of Child Language9: 169–191.
Clark, E.V. & Berman, R.A. (1984). Language structure and language use in the acquisition of word-formation, Language6: 542–590.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In: G. Underwood (ed.), Strategies of information processing(pp. 151–216). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior19: 450–466.
Feldman, L.B. & Bentin, S. (1994). Morphological analysis of disrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology47: 407–435.
Feldman, L.B., Frost, R. & Pnini, T. (1995). Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: Evidence from English and Hebrew, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21: 947–960.
Frost, R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: Evidence from a deep and a shallow orthography, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition20: 116–129.
Gathercole, S.E. & Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
Gregg, V. (1976). Word frequency, recognition and recall. In: J. Brown (ed.), Recognition and Recall(pp. 183–216). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Hardyck, C.D. & Petrinovich, I.F. (1970). Subvocal speech and comprehension level as a function of the difficulty level of the reading material, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior9: 647–652.
Kahn-Horowitz, J. (1995). Developmental effects of reading without vowels. MA thesis. University of Haifa.
Kintsch, W. (1970). Learning, memory, and conceptual processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Kleiman, G.M. (1975). Speech recoding, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior14: 323–339.
Koriat, A. (1984). Reading without vowels: Lexical access in Hebrew. In: H. Bouma & D.G. Bouwhuis (eds.), Attention and performance, Vol. 10: Control of language processes(pp. 227–242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Koriat, A. (1985). Lexical access for low and high frequency words in Hebrew, Memory and Cognition13: 37–44.
Levy, B.A. (1977). Reading: Speech and meaning processes, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior16: 623–638.
Levy, B.A. (1978). Speech processes during reading. In: A.M. Lesgold, S.W. Pellegrino, S.W. Fokkema & R. Glaser (eds.), Cognitive psychology and instruction(pp. 123–151). New York: Plenum Press.
Levy, Y. (1988). The nature of early language: Evidence from the development of Hebrew morphology. In: Y. Levy, I.M. Schlesinger & M.D.S. Braine (eds.), Categories and processes in language acquisition(pp. 73–98). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Mandler, J.M., Pearlstone, Z. & Koopmans, H.S. (1969). Effects of organization and semantic similarity on recall and recognition, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior8: 410–423.
Mann, V.A., Liberman, I.Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Children's memory for sentences and word strings in relation to reading ability, Memory and Cognition8: 329–335.
McCutchen, D. & Perfetti, C.A. (1982). The visual tongue twister effect: Phonological activation in silent reading, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior21: 672–687.
Navon, D. & Shimron, J. (1981). Does word naming involve grapheme-to-phoneme translation? Evidence form Hebrew, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior20: 97–109.
Navon, d. & Shimron, J. (1985). Source and function of phonological codes in processing written Hebrew. Final report to the US-Israeli Binational Science Foundation. University of Haifa.
Shimron, J. (1993). The role of vowels in reading: A review of studies of English and Hebrew, Psychological Bulletin114: 52–67.
Shimron, J. & Navon, D. (1982). The dependence on graphemes and on their translation to phonemes in reading: A developmental perspective, Reading Research Quarterly17: 210–228.
Shimron, J. & Sivan, T. (1994). Time of reading and comprehension depends on the orthography you read: Evidence from Hebrew and English, Language Learning44: 5–27.
Waters, G.S., Caplan, D. & Hilderbrandt, N. (1987). Working memory and written sentence comprehension. In: M. Colthaeart (ed.), Attention and performance, Vol. 12: The psychology of reading(pp.531–558). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Waters, G.S., Komoda, M.K. & Arbuckel, T.Y. (1985). The effects of concurrent tasks on reading: Implications for phonological recoding, Journal of Memory and Language24: 27–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shimron, J. The role of vowel signs in Hebrew: Beyond word recognition. Reading and Writing 11, 301–319 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008045316692
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008045316692