Skip to main content
Log in

Are there adequate data to assess how well theories of rarity apply to marine invertebrates?

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the biology of rare species is a very important part of conservation biology. Most of our current understanding of rarity has, however, come from studies of terrestrial plants, birds, mammals and some insects. Freshwater and marine habitats are underrepresented in published studies of rare species or conservation biology. We therefore have little knowledge about how well our understanding of what makes particular species rare and how rare species persist applies to marine invertebrates which form a major component of coastal biodiversity. In this review, I examine some theories about rarity with respect to intertidal and shallow subtidal invertebrates to identify whether there are adequate data to apply these theories to marine invertebrates and how well such theories apply. The general conclusions are that the lack of quantitative data on abundances, ranges, habitat-requirements, dispersal and connectedness among populations for marine invertebrates means that their status as rare species cannot really be assessed appropriately. It is also unlikely that, without extensive sampling programmes and considerable expense, adequate data could be obtained for these small, cryptic animals, which typically have very patchy, variable and unpredictable patterns of distribution and abundance. Intertidal and subtidal assemblages are diverse, including species with many different life-histories from many phyla, occupying the same suite of habitats. It is therefore suggested that future research on rare organisms in marine habitats should build upon the long and successful history of experimental marine studies to test specific hypotheses about processes influencing rarity in the field. Such studies would not only add a new dimension to our current understanding of rarity, but would also provide badly-needed data on the status of rare marine invertebrates. abundances, invertebrates, marine, range, rarity

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen JD and Flecker AS (1993) Biodiversity conservation in running waters. BioScience 43: 32–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW and Leary RF (1986) Heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations of animals. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation Biology: The Sciences of Scarcity and Diversity, pp 57–76. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DT, White BN and Egan EA (1976) The larval development and metamorphosis of the Ascidians Pyura praeputialis (Heller) and Pachydermatina pleurogona (Herdman), family Pyuridae. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 100: 205–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier PL (1995) Ecological attributes of extinction-prone species: loss of freshwater fishes of Virginia. Conserv. Biol. 9: 143–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Arita HT (1993) Rarity in neotropical bats: correlations with phylogeny, diet, and body mass. Ecol. Appl. 3: 506–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Arita HT, Robinson JG and Redford KH (1990) Rarity in Neotropical forest mammals and its ecological correlates. Conserv. Biol. 4: 181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM and Gaston KJ (1996) Spatial patterns in the geographic range sizes of bird species in the New World. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 351: 897–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM and Lawton JH (1994) Population abundance and body size in animal assemblages. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 343: 33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Lawton JH and Pimm SL (1993) Non-metabolic explanations for the relationship between body size and animal abundance. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 694–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124: 255–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH and Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (1993) Neoextinctions of marine invertebrates. Am. Zool. 33: 499–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 215–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G and Gunn A (1996) Conservation Biology in Theory and Practice. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman MG (1994) Small-scale patterns of distribution and size-structure of the intertidal littorinid, Littorina unifasciata (Gastropoda: Littorinidae) in New South Wales. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 45: 635–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman MG (1995) Aggregation of the littorinid snail Littorina unifasciata in New South Wales, Australia. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 126: 191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman MG and Underwood AJ (1996) Experiments on effects of sampling biota under intertidal and shallow subtidal boulders. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 207: 103–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark KB (1994) Ascoglossan (= Saccoglossan) molluscs in the Florida keys: rare marine invertebrates at special risk. Bull. Mar. Sci. 54: 900–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 117–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Comins HN and Noble IR (1985) Dispersal, variability and transient niches: species coexistence in a uniformly variable environment. Am. Nat. 126: 706–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1985) Variation and persistence of rocky shore populations. In: Moore PG and Seed R (eds) The Ecology of Rocky Coasts, pp 57–69. Hodder & Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH and Sousa WP (1983) On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence. Am. Nat. 121: 789–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor EF and Simberloff D (1978) Species number and compositional similarity of the Galápagos flora and avifauna. Ecol. Monogr. 48: 219–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK (1984) Processes structuring some marine communities: are they general? In: Strong DR Jr, Simberloff D, Abele LG and Thistle AB (eds) Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence, pp 181–197. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Boer PJ (1968) Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. Acta Biotheor. 18: 165–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM (1984) Historic extinctions: a Rosetta Stone for understanding prehicstoric extinctions. In: Martin PS and Klein RG (eds) Quaternary Extinctions: A Prehistoric Evolution, pp 824–862. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury WH (1980) Rare species of plants. Rhodora 82: 3–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather PG (1985) Differential predation on alternative prey, and the survival of rocky intertidal organisms in New South Wales. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 89: 135–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather PG (1988a) Predation can increase variability in the abundance of prey on seashores. Oikos 53: 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather PG (1988b) Consequences of supply-side ecology: manipulating the recruitment of intertidal barnacles affects the predation upon them. Biol. Bull. Mar. Biol. Lab., Woods Hole 175: 349–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather PG (1990) Ecological changes due to our use of the coast: research needs versus efforts. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 16: 71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather PG (1991) A conceptual framework for ecological studies of coastal resources: an example of a tunicate collected for bait on Australian seashores. Ocean Shore. Man. 15: 125–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Flessa KW, Erben HK, Hallam A, Hsu KJ, Jablonski D, Raup DM, Seploski JJ Jr, Soulé ME, Sousa W, Stinnesbeck W and Vermeij GJ (1986) Mass extinctions, extinction events, and background extinctions. In: Raup DM and Jablonski D (eds) Patterns and Processes in the History of Life, pp 235–257. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher WJ (1987) Interactions among subtidal Australian sea urchins, gastropods and algae: effects of experimental removals. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 89–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromentin JM, Ibanez F, Dauvin JC, Dewarumez JM and Elkaim B (1997) Long-term changes of four macrobenthic assemblages from 1978 to 1992. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 77: 287–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity SD and Levings SC (1984) Aggregation in a tropical neritid. Veliger 27: 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1996) The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance-distribution relationship. Oikos 76: 211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1998) Species range-size distributions: products of speciation, extinction and transformation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 353: 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ and McArdle BH (1993) Measurement of variation in the size of populations in space and time: some points of clarification. Oikos 68: 357–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ and McArdle BH (1994) The temporal variability of animal abundances: measures, methods and patterns. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 345: 335–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee JM and Warwick RM (1994) Body-size distribution in a marine metazoan community and the fractal dimensions of macroalgae. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 178: 247–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JS, Aschan M, Carr MR, Clarke KR, Green RH, Pearson TH, Rosenberg R and Warwick RM (1988) Analysis of community attributes of the benthic macrofauna of Frierfjord/Langesundfjord and in a mesocosm experiment. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 46: 151–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall BP and Moreau RM (1962) A study of rare birds of Africa. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Zool. 8: 313–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam A (1976) Stratigraphic distribution and ecology of European Jurassic bivalves. Lethaia 9: 245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1991) Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 17–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes MW (1991) Seaweeds of British Colombia: biodiversity, ecology, and conservation status. Can. Biodivers. 1: 4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward TL and McGowan JA (1979) Pattern and structure in an oceanic planktonic community. Am. Zool. 19: 1045–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JG (1993) Commonness and rarity in British butterflies. J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 407–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard RK and Edgar GJ (1994) Seagrass meadows. In: Hammond LS and Synnot RN (eds) Marine Biology, pp 257–271. Longman Cheshire Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Irish KE and Norse EA (1996) Scant emphasis on marine biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 10: 680

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JBC (1984) Ecology of cryptic coral reef communities. III. Abundance and aggregation of encrusting organisms with particular reference to cheilostome bryozoa. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 75: 37–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes RE and Hatcher BG (1986) Shallow tropical marine environments. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation Biology: The Sciences of Scarcity and Diversity, pp 371–382. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson K (1988) The paradox of Rockall: why is a brooding gastropod (Littorina saxatilis) more widespread than one having a planktonic larval stage. Mar. Biol. 99: 507–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1977) Ecological correlates of rarity in a tropical bird community. Auk 94: 240–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattan GH (1992) Rarity and vulnerability: the birds of the Cordillera Central of Columbia. Conserv. Biol. 6: 64–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopowitz H, Thornhill AD and Anderson M (1994) A general stochastic model for the prediction of biodiversity losses based on habitat conversion. Conserv. Biol. 8: 425–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE and Gaston KJ (1993) The Biology of Rarity: Patterns, Causes and Consequences. TREE 8: 298–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE and Gaston KJ (1997) The Biology of Rarity: Causes and Consequences of Rare-common Differences. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1989) What is the relationship between population density and body size in animals. Oikos 55: 422–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1994) Population dynamic principles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Series B 344: 61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin R (1986) Supply side ecology. Science 234: 25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapstone BD, Underwood AJ and Creese RG (1984) Experimental analysis of the commensal relation between intertidal gastropods Patelloida mufria and the trochid Austrocochlea constricta. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 17: 85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquet PA, Navarette SA and Castilla JC (1995) Body size, population density, and the energetic equivalency rule. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 325–332

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle BH and Gaston KJ (1992) Comparing population variables. Oikos 64: 610–612

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle BH and Gaston KJ (1993) The temporal variability of populations. Oikos 67: 187–191

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle BH, Gaston KJ and Lawton JH (1990) Variation in the size of animal populations: patterns, problems and artefacts. J. Anim. Ecol. 59: 439–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge BA (1978) Predator intensity in a rocky intertidal community: effect of a canopy, wave action and desiccation on predator feeding rates. Oecologia (Berl.) 34: 17–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge BA, Lubchenco J and Ashkenas LR (1985) Diversity, heterogeneity and consumer pressure in a tropical rocky intertidal community. Oecologia (Berl.) 65: 394–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran MJ (1985) The timing and significance of sheltering and foraging behaviour of the predatory gastropod Morula marginalba Blainville (Muricidae). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 93: 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey DJ, Underwood AJ and Howitt L (1993) Scales of spatial patchiness in the distribution of marine soft sediment faunas. In: Battershill CN, Schiel DR, Jones GP, Creese RG and MacDiarmid AB (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Temperate Reef Symposium, pp 107–113. NIWA Marine, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey DJ, Underwood AJ, Howitt L and Stark JS (1992) Temporal variation in soft-sediment benthos. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 164: 233–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarette SA and Menge BA (1997) The body size-population density relationships in tropical rocky intertidal communities. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 557–566

    Google Scholar 

  • New TR (1993) Angels on a pin: dimensions of the crisis in invertebrate conservation. Am. Zool. 33: 623–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H (ed) The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation, pp 205–217. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D, Cairns S and Dillon T (1986) Seven forms of rarity and their frequence in the flora of the Britsih Isles. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation Biology: The Sciences of Scarcity and Diversity, pp 205–217. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz D, Rapp JK and Dixon PM (1984) Competitive abilities of sparse grass species: means of persistence or cause of abundance. Ecology 65: 1144–1154

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell MP and Lindberg DR (1988) Real and random patterns associated with molluscan spatial and temporal distributions. Paleobiology 14: 322–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadlier RA and Pressey RL (1994) Reptiles and amphibians of particular conservation concern in the western division of NSW: a preliminary review. Biol. Conserv. 69: 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Saetersdal M (1994) Rarity and species/area relationships of vascular plants in deciduous woods, western Norway – applications to nature reserve selection. Ecography 17: 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson WG (1996) Rarity of marine benthic species in Great Britain: development and application of assessment criteria. Aquat. Conserv. 6: 245–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheltema RS (1986) On dispersal and planktonic larvae of benthic invertebrates: an eclectic overview and summary of problems. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39: 290–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1987) The geographical distribution of rarity. Oecologia (Berl.) 74: 161–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd SA and Davies M (1997) Marine invertebrates of Southern Australia Part III. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences) Adelaide, South Australia, in conjunction with the Flora and Fauna of South Australia Handbooks Committee

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1988) The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 473–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk TD, Launer AE, Switky KR and Ehrlich PR (1994) Identifying extinction threats. BioScience 44: 592–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME (1986) Conservation biology. the sciences of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa WP (1984) Intertidal mosaics: patch size, propagule availability, and spatially variable patterns of succession. Ecology 65: 1918–1935

    Google Scholar 

  • Spight TM(1975) Factors extending gastropod embryonic development and their selective cost. Oecologia (Berl.) 21: 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD and Mallorie HC (1985) Rarity, species richness and conservation: butterflies of the Atlas Mountains in Morocco. Biol. Conserv. 33: 95–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SK (1990) Adaptive cluster sampling. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 85: 1050–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson G (1950) Reproduction and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol. Rev. 25: 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1981) Structure of a rocky intertidal community in New South Wales: patterns of vertical distribution and seasonal change. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 51: 57–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1986) The analysis of competition by field experiments. In: Kikkawa J and Anderson DJ (eds) Community Ecology: Pattern and Process, pp 240–268. Blackwell Scientific Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1992) Competition and marine plant-animal interactions. In: John DM, Hawkins SJ and Price JH (eds) Plant–Animal Interactions in the Marine Benthos, pp 443–475. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1993) Field experiments in intertidal ecology. In: Battershill CN, Schiel DR, Jones GP, Creese RG and MacDiarmid AB (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Temperate Reef Symposium, pp 7–13. NIWA Marine, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1996) Spatial patterns of variance in density of intertidal populations. In: Floyd RB, Sheppard AW and De Barro PJ (eds) Frontiers of Population Ecology, pp 369–389. CSIRO Publishers, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (in press) History and recruitment in the structure of intertidal assemblages on rocky shores. In: Whitfield M (ed) Aquatic Life Cycle Strategies. Institute of Biology, London

  • Underwood AJ and Chapman MG (1996) Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates. Oecologia (Berl.) 107: 212–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ and Chapman MG (1998) Spatial analyses of intertidal assemblages on sheltered rocky shores. Aust. J. Ecol. 23: 138–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ and Denley EJ (1984) Paradigms, explanations, and generalizations in models for the structure of intertidal communities on rocky shores. In: Strong DR, Simberloff D, Abele LG and Thistle AB (eds) Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence, pp 151–180. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ and Fairweather PG (1989) Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. TREE 4: 16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher MB (1986) Wildlife conservation evaluation: atributes, criteria and values. In: Usher MB (ed) Wildlife Conservation Evaluation, pp 3–44. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tienderen PH (1991) Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution 45: 1317–1331

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij GJ (1993) Biogeography of recently extinct marine species: implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 7: 391–397

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, M. Are there adequate data to assess how well theories of rarity apply to marine invertebrates?. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 1295–1318 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008909323840

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008909323840

Navigation