Abstract
In western discourse the notion of the contagious, the unclean or the contaminated is never just a neutral descriptor but carries the weight of all that stands against—and paradoxically secures—the categories of normative ontology and epistemology. Set against the ideal closure and invulnerability of the self's “clean and proper body,” this paper investigates the condition of disability as a potentially contaminatory threat. But the given precarious psychic constitution of the subject, and the ontological insecurity of self performativity, can we reconfigure vulnerability not as a term of weakness, but as the very possibility of becoming?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bogdan, R. (1988). Freak show. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boler, M. (1997). The risks of empathy. Cultural Studies, 11(2), 253–273.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of 'sex'. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London: Routledge.
Couser, G. T. (1997). Recovering bodies: Illness, disability and life writing. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Dennett, A. S. (1997). The Dime Museum freak show: Reconfigured as talk show. In R. G. Thomson (Ed.), Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body (pp. 315–326). New York: NYU Press.
Derrida, J. (1988). Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Friedman, J. B. (1981). The monstrous races in medieval art and literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Freud, S. (1953). Femininity. New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis (Standard ed., Vol. 22). London: Hogarth Press.
Goodin, R. E. (1998). Vulnerabilities and responsibilities: An ethical defence of the welfare state. In G. Brock (Ed.), Necessary goods (pp. 73–94). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Grimes, K. (1998). Artist's statement: Still life. Dublin: Gallery of Photography.
Klein, M. (1957). Envy and gratitude. London: Tavistock.
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A selection (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: W. W. Norton.
Longmore, P. K. (1997). Conspicuous contribution and American cultural dilemmas: Telethon rituals of cleansing and renewal. In D. T. Mitchell & S. L. Snyder (Eds.), The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability (pp. 134–158). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Natanson v. Kline, 186 Kan. 393, 350 P2d 1093 (1960).
Nussbaum, M. (1986). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. London: Macmillan Press.
Price, J., & Shildrick, M. (1998). Uncertain thoughts on the dis/abled body. In M. Shildrick & J. Price (Eds.), Vital signs: Feminist reconfigurations of the bio/logical body (pp. 93–113). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (1997). Defending the social model. Disability and Society, 2(4), 293–300.
Shildrick, M.(1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries:Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics. London: Routledge.
Shildrick, M., & Price, J. (1996). Breaking the boundaries of the broken body. Body & Society, 2(4).
Spivak, G. C. (1990). The post-modern condition: The end of politics? In S. Harasym (Ed.), The postcolonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues (pp. 17–34). London: Routledge.
Thomson, R. G. (Ed.). (1997). Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body. New York: New York University Press.
Waldby, C. (1996). AIDS and the body politic: Biomedicine and sexual difference. London: Routledge.
Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shildrick, M. Becoming Vulnerable: Contagious Encounters and the Ethics of Risk. Journal of Medical Humanities 21, 215–227 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009025125203
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009025125203