Skip to main content
Log in

Pregnancy Intendedness and Physical Abuse Around the Time of Pregnancy: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 1996–1997

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: This study examines whether unintended pregnancy is associated with physical abuse of women occurring around the time of pregnancy, independent of other factors. Methods: In 1996–1997, state-specific population-based data were obtained from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from 39,348 women in 14 states who had delivered a live-born infant within the previous 2–6 months. The study questionnaire asked about maternal behaviors and characteristics around the time of pregnancy. Results: Women who had mistimed or unwanted pregnancies reported significantly higher levels of abuse at any time during the 12 months before conception or during pregnancy (12.6% and 15.3%, respectively) compared with those with intended pregnancies (5.3%). Higher rates of abuse were reported by women who were younger, Black, unmarried, less educated, on Medicaid, living in crowded conditions, entering prenatal care late, or smoking during the third trimester. Overall, women with unintended pregnancies had 2.5 times the risk of experiencing physical abuse compared with those whose pregnancies were intended. This association was modified by maternal characteristics; the association was strongest among women who were older, more educated, White, married, not on Medicaid, not living in crowded conditions, receiving first trimester prenatal care, or nonsmoking during the third trimester. Conclusions: Women with unintended pregnancies are at increased risk of physical abuse around the time of pregnancy compared with women whose pregnancies are intended. Prenatal care can provide an important point of contact where women can be screened for violence and referred to services that can assist them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Research in brief. Washington, DC, and Atlanta GA: National Institute of Justice, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bachman R, Saltzman LE. Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gazmararian JA, Lazorick S, Spitz AM, Ballard TJ, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Prevalence of violence against pregnant women: A review of the literature. JAMA 1996;27:1915–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abma J, Chandra A, Mosher W, Peterson L, Piccinino L. Fertility, family planning and womens health: New data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth, National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 1997;23(19).

  5. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:24–9, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Institute of Medicine. The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell JC, Pugh LC, Campbell D, Visscher M. The influence of abuse on pregnancy intention. Womens Health Issues 1995;5:214–23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gazmararian JA, Adams MM, Saltzman LE, Johnson CH, Bruce FC, Marks JS, Zahniser SC. The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:1031–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amaro H, Fried LE, Cabral H, Zuckerman B. Violence during pregnancy and substance use. Am J Public Health 1990;80:575–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cokkinides V, Coker A, Sappenfield W. Prevalence and correlates of physical violence during pregnancy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, New York, November 20, 1996.

  11. Dietz PM, Gazmararian JA, Goodwin MM, Bruce FC, Johnson CH, Rochat RW. Delayed entry into prenatal care: Effect of physical violence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:221–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hillard PJA. Physical abuse in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:185–90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart DE, Cecutti A. Physical abuse in pregnancy. Can Med Assoc J 1993;149:1257–63.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evins G, Chescheir N. Prevalence of domestic violence among women seeking abortion services. Womens Health Issues 1996;4:204–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glander SS, Moore ML, Michielutte R, Parsons LH. The prevalence of domestic violence among women seeking abortion. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:1002–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Adams MM, Shulman HB, Bruce C, Hogue C, Brogan D, The PRAMS Working Group. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System: Design, questionnaire, data collection and response rates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1991;5:333–46.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers MM, Ahluwalia IB, Melvin CL. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Womens Health 1998;7(7):799–801.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Census of Housing 1980. Characteristics of housing units. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1982:1(A).

  19. Shah BV, Barnwell BG, Beiler GS. SUDAAN user's manual: Software for analysis of correlated data. Release 6.40. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Working Group comprises the following state collaborators:L. Albert Woolbright, Alabama; Kathy Perham-Hester, Alaska; Gina Redford, Arkansas; Darci Cherry, Colorado; Richard Hopkins, Florida; Leslie Lipscomb, Georgia; Martha Henson, Maine; Yasmina Bouraoui, Michigan; Michael Medvesky, New York; Michelle Beck-Warden, North Carolina; Richard Lorenz, Oklahoma; Kriisten Helms, South Carolina; Linda Lohdefink, Washington; and Melissa Baker, West Virginia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodwin, M.M., Gazmararian, J.A., Johnson, C.H. et al. Pregnancy Intendedness and Physical Abuse Around the Time of Pregnancy: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 1996–1997. Matern Child Health J 4, 85–92 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009566103493

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009566103493

Navigation