Abstract
A taxonomy of functional assessment constructs was developed to help the Social Security Administration refine the measurements of work disability. This report addresses content validity of the new taxonomy by examining the relevance of its constructs to a specific disability, and by examining the relationship between these constructs and constructs in other taxonomies. Seven experts linked the new taxonomy to consequences of low-back impairments. The selected constructs were compared to those reported independently by patients (Harper AC, Harper DA, Lambert L, Andrews HB, Lo SK, Ross FM, Straker LM. Pain 1992; 50(2): 189–195). The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps served to bridge the two exercises. The findings reveal that it is feasible to use the taxonomy to define the impact of a specific disability and consequently link it to a set of standard measurements. Low-back impairments may be best assessed through measures of physical functional limitations, vocational impact, and interpersonal and emotional behavior. The study did not yield cognitive and intellectual measures that were relevant to this impairment.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Stoddard S, Jans L, Ripple J, Kraus L. Chartbook on work and disability in the United States, 1998. An InfoUse report. Washington, DC: U.S. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, 1998, p. 25. Available at http://www.infouse.com/disabilitydata/workdisability 3 2.html.
Battié MC, Videman KT. Epidemiology of the back. In: Nordin M, Andersson GBJ, Pope MH, eds. Musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1997, p. 264.
National Center for Health Statistics NCHS. Healthy People 2000 Review. Hyattsville, MD: USDHHS/CDC, PHS 98-1256, 1997, p. 13.
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The frequency of occurrence, impact and cost of selected musculoskeletal conditions in the United States. Chicago, IL: AAOS, 1984.
Searchable On-line Accommodation Resource (SOAR). Back conditions. US DOL Office of Disability Employment. Available at http://www.jan.wvu.edu/soar/back.html.
Bruyére SM. The Americans with Disability Act of 1990 and injured workers. Ithaca, NY: ILR, Cornell University, 1997.
World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: WHO, 1980.
World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: International classification of impairments, activities and participation: A manual of dimensions of disablement and functioning. Geneva: WHO, 1997.
Harper AC, Harper DA, Lambert L, Andrews HB, Lo SK, Ross FM, Straker LM. Symptoms of impairment, disability and handicap in low-back pain: A taxonomy. Pain 1992; 50(2): 189-195.
Matheson LN, Gaudino EA, Mael FA. Improving the validity of the impairment evaluation process:Aproposed theoretical framework. JOR 2000; 10(4): 311-320.
Gaudino E, Matheson L, Mael F. Final Report: Development of a functional assessment taxonomy for work disability. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, 1999.
Gaudino E. Crosswalk-Functional assessment construct (FAC) taxonomy and the international classification of impairments, disability, and handicap-2, beta draft 1. Washington, DC: AIR, July 27, 1999.
Bernard BP, ed. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low-back. Washington, DC: DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-141, Chap. 6. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pdfs/97-141c.pdf.
Pope MH. Whole body vibration. In: Nordin M, Andersson GBJ, Pope MH, eds. Musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1997, pp. 127-133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halpern, M. Functional Assessment Taxonomy Relevant to Low-Back Impairments. J Occup Rehabil 11, 201–215 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013026611675
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013026611675