Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Multiple Importations of Pests and Pathogens on a Native Tree

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate changes in the past reshaped the North American native forests as some species increased and others decreased in number and distribution. Native American chestnuts were once abundant, but have been eliminated from the forest canopy by two imported pathogens, and are additionally threatened by an imported pest. The trees survive one of the pathogens, but rarely become larger than understory shrubs. These clumps of sprouts provide a reservoir of genetic diversity for use in reinstating this tree into its forest habitat. An imported parasite can be used to control one pathogen and allow the sprouts to grow large enough to flower. The trees can then be crossed with imported chestnuts of other species with good resistance to both pathogens, and resistant offspring selected. Good progress has been made in coping with these imported problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams SM and Stephenson SL (1983) Adescription of the vegetation on the south slopes of Peters Mountain, southwestern Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 110: 18-23

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostakis SL (1977) Vegetative incompatibility in Endothia parasitica. Experimental Mycology 1: 306-316

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostakis SL (1989) An historical reference for chestnut introductions into North America. Annual Report of the Northern Nut Growers Association 80: 132-143

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostakis SL (1990) Improved chestnut tree condition maintained in two Connecticut plots after treatments with hypovirulent strains of the chestnut blight fungus. Forest Science 36: 113-124

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostakis SL (1992) Measuring resistance of chestnut trees to chestnut blight. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 568-571

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostakis SL (1995) The pathogens and pests of chestnuts. In: Andrews JH and Tommerup I (eds) Advances in Botanical Research, Vol 21, pp 125-145. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostakis SL (2001) American chestnut sprout survival with biological control of the chestnut-blight fungus population. Forest Ecology and Management 152: 225-233

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostakis SL and Jaynes RA (1973) Chestnut blight control: use of hypovirulent cultures. Plant Disease Reporter 57: 225-226

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostakis SL and Payne JA (1993) Oriental Chestnut GallWasp. Pest Alert NA-PR-02-93, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Area, Asheville, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostakis SL, Chen B, Geletka LM and Nuss DL (1998) Hypovirus transmission to ascospore progeny by field-released transgenic hypovirulent strains of Cryphonectria parasitica. Phytopathology 88: 598-604

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson PJ (1914) The morphology and life history of the chestnut blight fungus. Bulletin 7, Pennsylvania Chestnut Tree Blight Commission, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 44 pp + XVII

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TW (1974) The chestnut pollen decline as a time horizon in lake sediments in Eastern North America. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 11: 678-685

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey RW and Rinell KT (1967) Events in the turkey year. In: Hewitt OH (ed) TheWild Turkey and Its Management, pp 73-91. The Wildlife Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhiry N and Filion L (1996) Mid-holocene hemlock decline in eastern North America linked with phytophagous insect activity. Quaternary Research 45: 312-320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissegger M, Rigling D and Heiniger U (1997) Population structure and disease development of Cryphonectria parasitica in European chestnut forests in the presence of natural hypovirulence. Phytopathology 87: 50-59

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham CR (1988) The restoration of the American chestnut. American Scientist 76: 478-487

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi GH and Nuss DL (1992) Hypovirulence of chestnut blight fungus conferred by an infectious viral cDNA. Science 257: 800-803

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton GP (1912) Chestnut bark disease. Report of the Station Botanist, 1911-1912, pp 407-413. Annual Report of The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsa WP (1896) Nut Culture in the United States: Embracing Native and Introduced Species. US Department of Agriculture, Division of Pomology, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 144 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortesi P and Milgroom MG (1998) Genetics of vegetative incompatibility in Cryphonectria parasitica. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64: 2988-2994

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall BS (1950) The distribution and significance of the chestnut root rot Phytophthoras, P. cinnamomi and P. cambivora. Plant Disease Reporter 34: 194-196

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall BS, Gravatt GF and Ryan MM (1945) Root disease of Castanea species and some coniferous and broadleaf nursery stocks, caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phytopathology 35: 162-180

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MB (1969) Climatic changes in Southern Connecticut recorded by pollen deposition at Rogers Lake. Ecology 50: 409-422

    Google Scholar 

  • Day PR, Dodds JA, Elliston JE, Jaynes RA and Anagnostakis SL (1977) Double-stranded RNA in Endothia parasitica. Phytopathology 67: 1393-1396

    Google Scholar 

  • Enebak SA, MacDonald WL and Hillman BI (1994) Effect of dsRNA associated with isolates of Cryphonectria parasitica from the central Appalachians and their relatedness to other dsRNAs from North America and Europe. Phytopathology 84: 528-534

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin DC and Ribeiro OK (1996) Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide, p 270. APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild D (1913) The discovery of the chestnut bark disease in China. Science 38: 297-299

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster DR and Zebryk TM (1993) Long-term vegetation dynamics and disturbance history of a Tsuga-dominated forest in central New England. Ecology 74: 982-998

    Google Scholar 

  • Frothingham EH (1912) Second-growth Hardwoods in Connecticut. Bulletin 96, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, 59 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller AS (1896) The Nut Culturist: A Treatise on the Propagation, Planting, and Cultivation of Nut-Bearing Trees and Shrubs Adapted to the Climate of the United States, with the Scientific and Common Names of the Fruits Known in Commerce as Edible or Otherwise Useful Nuts. Orange Judd Company, New York, 289 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller JL, Foster DR, McLachlan JS and Drake N (1998) Impact of human activity on regional forest composition and dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1: 76-95

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravatt GF and Marshall RP (1926) Chestnut blight in the Southern Appalachians. Circular 370, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 11 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Grente J (1965) Les formes Hypovirulentes d'Endothia parasitica et les espoirs de lutte contre le chancre du châtaignier. Acad´emie d'Agriculture de France, Extrait du Proces-verbal de la S´eance 51: 1033-1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Grente J (1975) La lutte biologique contre le chancre du châtaignier par ‘Hypovirulence contagieuse’. Annales de Phytopathologie 7: 216-218

    Google Scholar 

  • Grente J and Sauret S (1969a) L'hypovirulence exclusive, ph´enomene original en pathologie v´eg´etale. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaire des S´eances de l'Acad´emie d'Agriculture de France, S´erie D 286: 2347-2350

    Google Scholar 

  • Grente J and Sauret S (1969b) L'hypovirulence exclusive’ estelle contrôl´ee par des d´eterminants cytoplasmiques? Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaire des S´eances de l'Acad´emie d'Agriculture de France, S´erie D 286: 3173-3176

    Google Scholar 

  • Grente J and Berthelay-Sauret S (1978) Biological control of chestnut blight in France. In: MacDonald WL, Cech FC, Luchock J and Smith C (eds) Proceedings of the American Chestnut Symposium, pp 30-34. West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin GJ (1989) Incidence of chestnut blight and survival of American chestnut in forest clearcut and neighboring understory sites. Plant Disease 73: 123-127

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin GJ (1992) American chestnut survival in understory mesic sites following the chestnut blight pandemic. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 1950-1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Guedes-Lafargue MR and Salesses G (1999) Ink disease resistance: some preliminary elements from the study of different crosses. In: Salesses G (ed) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Chestnut, pp 355-361. Acta Horticulturae 494, International Society of Horticultural Science, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiniger U and Rigling D (1994) Biological control of chestnut blight in Europe. Annual Review of Phytopathology 32: 581-599

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JM (1994) Wildlife value of Castanea dentata past and present, the historical decline of the chestnut and its future use in restoration of natural areas. In: Double ML and MacDonald WL (eds) Proceedings of the International Chestnut Conference, pp 186-193. West Virginia University Press, Morgantown, West Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman BI, Fulbright DW, Nuss DL and Van Alfen NK (1994) Hypoviridae. In: Murphy FA, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL, Ghabrial SA, Jarvis AW, Martelli GP, Mayo MP and Summers MD (eds) Sixth Report of the International Committee for the Taxonomy of Viruses, pp 261-264. Springer-Verlag, Wein

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber DH and Fulbright DW (1994) Preliminary investigations on the effect of individual vic genes upon the transmission of dsRNA in Cryphonectria parasitica. In: Double ML and MacDonald WL (eds) Proceedings of the International Chestnut Conference, pp 15-19. West Virginia University Press, Morgantown, West Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst GA (1992) Foods and feeding. In: Dickson JG (ed) The Wild Turkey, pp 66-83. The Wildlife Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Korschgen LJ (1967) Feeding habits and foods. In: Hewitt OH (ed) TheWild Turkey and Its Management, pp 137-198. TheWildlife Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubisiak TL, Hebard FV, Nelson CD, Zhang J, Bernatzky R, Huang H, Anagnostakis SL and Doudrick RL (1997) Mapping resistance to blight in an interspecific cross in the genus Castanea using morphological, isozyme, RFLP, and RAPD markers. Phytopathology 87: 751-759

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JK, Tattar TA, Berman PM and Mount MS (1992) Arapid method for testing the virulence of Cryphonectria parasitica using excised bark and wood of American chestnut. Phytopathology 82: 1454-1456

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald WL and Fulbright DW (1991) Biological control of chestnut blight: use and limitations of transmissible hypovirulence. Plant Disease 75: 656-661

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin AC, Zim HS and Nelson AL (1951) American Wildlife and Plants, a Guide toWildlife Food Habits. Dover Books, New York, 500 pp

  • McCormick JE and Platt RB (1980) Recovery of an Appalachian forest following the chestnut blight. American Midland Naturalist 104: 264-273

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel HW (1905) A deadly fungus on the American chestnut. NY Zoological Society, 10th Annual Report, pp 97-103

  • Metcalf H (1912) The chestnut bark disease. In: Yearbook of the Department of Agriculture for 1912, pp 363-372. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf H and Collins JF (1909) The present status of the chestnut bark disease. Bulletin 141, Part 5, pp 45-53. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgroom MG (1995) Population biology of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Canadian Journal of Botany 73(S1): S311-S319

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgroom MG and Cortesi P (1999) Analysis of population structure of the chestnut blight fungus based on vegetative incompatibility genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 96: 10518-10523

    Google Scholar 

  • Minser WG, Allen T, Ellsperman B and Schlarbaum SE (1995) Feeding response of wild turkeys to chestnuts and other hard mast. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting. SE Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies

  • Monteiro-Vitorello CB, Bell JA, Fulbright DW and Bertrand H (1995) A cytoplasmically transmissible hypovirulence phenotype associated with mitochondrial DNA mutations in the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 92: 5935-5939

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller EH, Serkin L and Craft JL (1993) Stratigraphic evidence of a pre-Wisconsinan interglaciation in the Adirondack Mountains, New York. Quaternary Research 40: 163-168

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuss DL (2000) Hypovirulence and chestnut blight: from the field to the laboratory and back. In: Kronstad JW (ed) Fungal Pathology, pp 149-170. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillet FL (1982) Ecological significance of American chestnut in the Holocene forests of Connecticut. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 109: 457-473

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillet FL (1993) Growth form and life histories of American chestnut and Allegheny and Ozark chinquapin at various North American sites. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 120: 257-268

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne JA, Green RA and Lester CD (1976) New nut pest: an Oriental Chestnut Gall Wasp in North America. Annual Report of the Northern Nut Growers Association 67: 83-86

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson AH (1913) Wood-using industries of Connecticut. Bulletin 174, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut, 96 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell GH (1900) The European and Japanese chestnuts in the Eastern United States. Eleventh Annual Report of the Delaware College Agricultural Experiment Station, pp 101-135. Newark, Delaware

  • Rankin WH (1912) The chestnut tree canker disease. Phytopathology 2: 99

    Google Scholar 

  • Russin JS, Shain L and Nordin GL (1984) Insects as carriers of virulent and cytoplasmic hypovirulent isolates of the chestnut blight fungus. Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 838-846

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucier JR (1973) American Chestnut, an American wood. Circular FS-230, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, 6 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharf SS and DePalma NK (1981) Birds and mammals as vectors of the chestnut blight fungus (Endothia parasitica). Canadian Journal of Zoology 59: 1647-1650

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear CL and Stevens NE (1913) The chestnut-blight parasite (Endothia parasitica) from China. Science 38: 295-297

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear CL and Stevens NE (1916) The discovery of the chestnut blight parasite (Endothia parasitica) and other chestnut fungi in Japan. Science 43: 173-176

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson SL, Adams HS and Lipford M (1991) The present distribution of chestnut in the upland forest communities of Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 118: 24-32

    Google Scholar 

  • Studhalter RA and Ruggles AG (1915) Insects as carriers of the chestnut blight fungus. Bulletin 12, Pennsylvania Department of Forestry, 33 pp

  • Waterworth HE and White GA (1982) Plant introductions and quarantine: the need for both. Plant Disease 66: 87-90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anagnostakis, S.L. The Effect of Multiple Importations of Pests and Pathogens on a Native Tree. Biological Invasions 3, 245–254 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015205005751

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015205005751

Navigation