Skip to main content
Log in

Reproducing the conformations of protein-bound ligands: A critical evaluation of several popular conformational searching tools

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several programs (Catalyst, Confort, Flo99, MacroModel, and Omega) that are commonly used to generate conformational ensembles have been tested for their ability to reproduce bioactive conformations. The ligands from thirty-two different ligand–protein complexes determined by high-resolution (le2.0 Å) X-ray crystallography have been analyzed. The Low-Mode Conformational Search method (with AMBER* and the GB/SA hydration model), as implemented in MacroModel, was found to perform better than the other algorithms. The rule-based method Omega, which is orders of magnitude faster than the other methods, also gave reasonable results but were found to be dependent on the input structure. The methods supporting diverse sampling (Catalyst, Confort) performed least well. For the seven ligands in the set having eight or more rotatable bonds, none of the bioactive conformations were ever found, save for one exception (Flo99). These ligands do not bind in a local minimum conformation according to AMBER*\GB/SA. Taking these last two observations together, it is clear that geometrically similar structures should be collected in order to increase the probability of finding the bioactive conformation among the generated ensembles. Factors influencing bioactive conformational retrieval have been identified and are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin, Y.C., J. Med. Chem., 35 (1992) 2145. b. Martin, Y.C., Bures, M.G. and Willett, P., In Lipkowitz, K.B., Boyd, D.B. (eds), Reviews in Computational Chemistry, VCH Publishers, New York, 1990, pp. 213-263.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marshall, G.R., Barry, C.D., Bosshard, H.E., Dammkoehler, R.A. and Dunn, D.A., in Olsen E.C., Christoffersen R.E. (eds), Computer-Assisted Drug Design., American Chemical Society Symposium: Washington DC, 1979, pp. 205-226.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 265 (1982) 269. b. Stoichet, B.K., Stroud, R.M., Santi, D.V., Kuntz, I.D. and Perry, K.M., Science, 259 (1993) 1445.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vedani, A., McMasters, D.R. and Dobler, M., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 19 (2000) 149. b. Guccione, S., Doweyko, A.M., Chen, H., Barretta, G.U. and Balzano, F., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 14 (2000) 647.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allen, F.H., Davies, J.E., Galloy, J.J., Johnson, O., Kennard, O., Macrae, C.F., Mitchell, E.M., Mitchell, G.F., Smith, J.M., and Watson, D.G., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 31 (1991) 187.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corina, Molecular Networks, GmbH Computerchemie Langemarckplatz 1, Erlangen, Germany.

  7. Sadowski, J., Gasteiger, J. and Klebe, G., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994) 1000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. MacroModel V7.0: Mohamadi, F., Richards, N.G.J., Guida, W.C., Liskamp, R., Lipton, M., Caufield, C., Chang, G., Hendrikson, T. and Still, W.C., J. Comput. Chem., 11 (1990) 440.

    Google Scholar 

  9. SYBYL molecular modeling software; TRIPOS Inc., 1699 South Hanley Road, Suite 303, St. Louis MO 63144.

  10. Treasurywala, A.M., Jaeger, E.P. and Peterson, M.L., J. Comput. Chem., 17 (1996) 1171.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leach, A., in Lipkowitz, K.B., Boyd, D.B. (eds), Reviews in Computational Chemistry, VCH Publishers, New York, 1991, pp. 1-47.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bernstein, F., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J.B., Meyer Jr, E.F., Brice, M.D., Rodgers, J.R., Kennard, O., Schimanouchi, T. and Tasumi, M.J., J. Mol. Biol., 112 (1977) 535.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hendlich, M., Acta Crystallographica D54 (1998) 1178. Relibase is copyright Manfred Hendlich 1994-1999 and Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre 1999, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The Omega program is available from OpenEye Science Software, 335c Winische Way, Santa Fe, NM 87501, U.S.A.

  15. Spraque, P.W., Perspect. Drug Disc. Des. 3 (1995) 1. b. Spraque, P.W. and Hoffman, R., in Waterbeemd, H., Testa, B. and Folkers, G. (eds), Computer-Assisted Lead Finding and Optimization, VHCA, Basel, 1990, pp. 223-230.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pearlman, R.S. and Balducci, R., Confort User's Manual, distributed by Tripos Inc., St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.

  17. McMartin, C. and Bohacek, R. J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 11 (1997) 333. b. McMartin, C. and Bohacek, R., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 9 (1995) 237.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smellie, A., Teig, S.L., and Towbin, P., J. Comp. Chem., 16 (1995) 171.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H. and Teller, E., J. Chem. Phys., 21 (1953) 1087.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kolossváry, I. and Guida, W.C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118 (1996) 5011. b. Kolossváry I. and Guida, W.C., J. Comput. Chem., 20 (1999) 1671.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Still, W.C., Tempczyk, A., Hawley, R.C. and Hendrickson, T., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112 (1990) 6127.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Personal communication, Jens Sadowski, AstraZeneca R&D Mölndal, Sweden.

  23. SPARTAN 5.1, Wavefunction, Inc.18401 Von Karman Ave., Ste. 370, Irvine, CA 92612 U.S.A.

  24. Fox, T., Coll, J.T., Xie, X., Ford, P.J., Germann, U.A., Porter, M.D., Pazhanisamy, S., Fleming, M.A., Galullo, V., Su, M.S. and Wilson, K.P., Protein Sci., 7 (1998) 2249.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Boström, J., Norrby, P.-O. and Liljefors, T., J. Comput.-Aided. Mol. Des., 12 (1998) 383.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kurinov, I.V. and Harrison, R.W., Nat. Struct. Biol., 1 (1994) 735.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, Z., Bernlohr, D.A. and Banaszak, L.J., J. Biol. Chem., 268 (1993) 7874.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pearlman, R.S., Concord User's Manual, distributed by Tripos Inc., St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.

  29. Pastor, M., Cruciani., G., McLay, I., Pickett, S. and Clementi, S., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 3233.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Howard, A.E., Singh, U.E., Billeter, M. and Kollman, P.A., J., Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 6984. b. Meng, E.C., Cieplak, P., Caldwell, J.W. and Kollman, P.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 (1994) 12061.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boström, J. Reproducing the conformations of protein-bound ligands: A critical evaluation of several popular conformational searching tools. J Comput Aided Mol Des 15, 1137–1152 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015930826903

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015930826903

Navigation