Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling Population Responses of Rapidly-Adapting Mechanoreceptive Fibers

  • Published:
Journal of Computational Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The population response of rapidly-adapting (RA) fibers is one component of the physiological substrate of the sense of touch. Herein, we describe a computational scheme based on the population-response model by K.O. Johnson (J. Neurophysiol. 37: 48–72, 1974) which we extended by permitting the capability to include the spatial distributions of receptors in the glabrous skin linked to RA fibers. The hypothetical cases simulated were rectangular, uniformly random and proximo-distally Gaussian distributions. Each spatial organization produced qualitatively distinct population-response profiles that also varied due to stimulus parameters. The effects of stimulus amplitude, average innervation density and contactor-probe location were studied by considering various response measures: number of active fibers, summated firing rate and the average firing rate of a subset of the modeled population. The outcome of the measures were statistically compared among simulated anatomical distributions. The response is the same for rectangular and uniformly random distributions, both of which have a homogeneous innervation density. However, the Gaussian distribution produced statistically different responses when the measure was not averaged over the subset population which represented the receptive field of a higher-order neuron. These results indicate that, as well as stimulus parameters, the anatomical organization is a significant determinant of the population response. Therefore, reconstructing population activity for testing psychophysical hypotheses must presently be done with care until the organization of the receptors within the skin has been clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armett CJ, Gray JAB, Hunsperger RW, Lal S (1962) The transmission of information in primary receptor neurones and second-order neurones of a phasic system. J. Physiol. 164: 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolanowski SJ (1996) Information processing channels in the sense of touch. In: O Franzen, R Johansson, L Tarenius, eds. Wenner-Gren International Series: Somesthesis and the Neurobiology of the Somatosensory Cortex. Birkhäuser, Basel. pp. 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolanowski SJ, Gescheider GA, Verrillo RT, Checkosky CM(1988) Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84: 1680–1694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolanowski SJ, Pawson L, Dishman JD (2000) The organization of Meissners and Merkels in cat and monkey glabrous skin. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 26: 426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolanowski SJ, Pawson L, Verrillo R (1999) Tactile receptor responses to vibratory stimuli placed on and around their receptive-field centers. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 25: 407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton CF, Winkelmann RK, Dyck PJ (1966) A quantitative study of Meissner's corpuscles in man. Neurology 16: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bystrzycka E, Nail BS, Rowe M (1977) Inhibition of cuneate neurones: Its afferent source and influence on dynamically sensitive ‘tactile’ neurones. J. Physiol. 268: 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauna N (1956) Nerve supply and nerve endings in Meissner's corpuscles. Am. J. Anat. 99: 315–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauna N (1959) The mode of termination of sensory nerves and its significance. J. Comp. Neur. 113: 169–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauna N (1965) The effects of aging on the receptor organs of the human dermis. In:W Montagna, ed. Advances in Biology of Skin Vol. VI: Aging. Pergamon, Oxford. pp. 63–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo RM, Gardner EP (1980) A quantitative analysis of responses of direction-sensitive neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 43: 1319–1341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig JC (1976) Attenuation of vibrotactile spatial summation. Sens. Proc. 1: 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith I, Davidson I, Johnson KO (1980) Peripheral neural representation of spatial dimensions of a textured surface moving across the monkey's finger pad. J. Physiol. 309: 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith I, Kenins P (1980) Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibres supplying glabrous skin of the monkey's index finger. J. Physiol. 309: 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith I, Oke LE (1980) Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey's finger pad. J. Physiol. 309: 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiCarlo JJ, Johnson KO (1999) Velocity invariance of receptive field structure in somatosensory cortical area 3b of the alert monkey. J. Neurosci. 19: 401–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiCarlo JJ, Johnson KO (2000) Spatial and temporal structure of receptive fields in primate somatosensory area 3b: Effects of stimulus scanning direction and orientation. J. Neurosci. 20: 495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiCarlo JJ, Johnson KO, Hsiao SS (1998) Structure of receptive fields in area 3b of primary somatosensory cortex in the alert monkey. J. Neurosci. 18: 2626–2645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykes RW(1983) Parallel processing of somatosensory information: A theory. Brain Res. Rev. 6: 47–115.

  • Fuller DRG, Gray JAB (1966) The relation between mechanical displacements applied to a cat's pad and the resultant impulse patterns. J. Physiol. 182: 465–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner EP, Spencer W (1972a) Sensory funneling. I. Psychophysical observations of human subjects and responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents in the cat to patterned stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 35: 925–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner EP, Spencer W (1972b) Sensory funneling. II. Cortical neuronal representation of patterned cutaneous stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 35: 954–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gescheider GA, Capraro AJ, Frisina RD, Hamer RD, Verrillo RT (1978) The effects of a surround on vibrotactile thresholds. Sens. Proc. 2: 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin AW, Browning AS, Wheat HE (1995) Representation of curved surfaces in responses of mechanoreceptive afferent fibers innervating the monkey's fingerpad. J. Neurosci. 15: 798–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin AW, Macefield VG, Bisley JW (1997) Encoding of object curvature by tactile afferents from human fingers. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 2881–2888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin AW, Pierce ME (1981) Population of quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innervating monkey glabrous skin: Representation of two vibrating probes. J. Neurophysiol. 45: 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin AW, Wheat HE (1999) Effects of nonuniform fiber sensitivity, innervation geometry, and noise on information relayed by a population of slowly adapting type I primary afferents from the fingerpad. J. Neurosci. 19: 8057–8070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin AW, Youl BD, Zimmerman NP (1981) Single quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents innervating monkey glabrous skin: Response to two vibrating probes. J. Neurophysiol. 45: 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray JAB (1966) The representation of information about rapid changes in a population of receptor units signalling mechanical events. In: AVS de Reuck, J Knight, eds. Touch, Heat and Pain. Little, Brown, Boston. pp. 299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan JD, Bolanowski SJ (1996) The psychophysics of tactile perception and its peripheral physiological basis. In: L Kruger, ed. Handbook of Perception and Cognition 7: Pain and Touch. Academic Press, San Diego. pp. 25–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güçlü B, Bolanowski SJ (1999) Population responses of RA mechanoreceptors with hypothetical spatial distributions. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 25: 407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güçlü B, Bolanowski SJ (2001) Statistical comparison of the intensity characteristics of monkey and cat mechanoreceptive RA fibers. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 27, Program No: 50.4.

  • Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1979) Tactile sensibility in the human hand: Relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J. Physiol. 286: 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Vallbo ÅB (1980) Spatial properties of the population of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Brain Res. 184: 353–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KO (1974) Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 37: 48–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KO, Hsiao SS (1992) Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 15: 227–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KO, Lamb GD (1981) Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: Neural patterns evoked by Braille-like dot patterns in the monkey. J. Physiol. 310: 117–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juliano SL, Whitsel BL(1987)Acombined 2-deoxyglucose and neurophysiological study of primate somatosensory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 263: 514–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang R, Herman D, MacGillis M, Zarzecki P (1985) Convergence of sensory inputs in somatosensory cortex: Interactions from separate afferent sources. Exp. Brain Res. 57: 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb GD (1983) Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: Peripheral neural coding in the monkey. J. Physiol. 338: 567–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom U (1965) Properties of touch receptors in distal glabrous skin of the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 28: 966–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle VB (1957) Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 20: 408–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle VB (1967) The problem of sensing and the neural coding of sensory events. In:GC Quarton, T Melnechuk, FO Schmidt, eds. The Neurosciences: A Study Program. Rockefeller Univ. Press, New York. pp. 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle VB, Powell TPS (1959) Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 105: 201–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountcastle VB, Talbot WH, Kornhuber HH (1966) The neural transformation of mechanical stimuli delivered to the monkey's hand. In: AVS de Reuck, J Knight, eds. Touch, Heat and Pain. Little, Brown, Boston. pp. 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger BL (1971) Patterns of organization of peripheral sensory receptors. In: WR Loewenstein, ed. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol.1. Springer, Berlin. pp. 523–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer SE (1999) Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JR, Johansson RS, Johnson KO (1992) Responses of human mechanoreceptive afferents to embossed dot arrays scanned across fingerpad skin. J. Neurosci. 12: 827–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981a) Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 1192–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981b) Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings. J. Neurophysiol. 46: 1204–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JR, Johnson KO, Hsiao SS (1988) Spatial pattern representation and transformation in monkey somatosensory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85: 1317–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobol' IM (1974) The Monte Carlo Method. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot WH, Darian-Smith I, Kornhuber HH, Mountcastle VB (1968) The sense of flutter-vibration: Comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J. Neurophysiol. 31: 301–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrillo RT (1963) Effect of contactor area on the vibrotactile threshold. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35: 1962–1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren S, Hamalainen HA, Gardner EP (1986) Objective classifi-cation of motion-and direction-sensitive neurons in primary somatosensory cortex in awake monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 56: 598–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheat HE, Goodwin AW (2000) Tactile discrimination of gaps by slowly adapting afferents: Effects of population parameters and anisotropy in the fingerpad. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 1430–1444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Sensory Research, 621 Skytop Road, Syracuse, NY, 13244-5290, USA

    Burak Güçlü & Stanley J. Bolanowski

  2. Department of Bioengineering and Neuroscience, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA

    Burak Güçlü & Stanley J. Bolanowski

Authors
  1. Burak Güçlü
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stanley J. Bolanowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Güçlü, B., Bolanowski, S.J. Modeling Population Responses of Rapidly-Adapting Mechanoreceptive Fibers. J Comput Neurosci 12, 201–218 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016535413000

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016535413000

Search

Navigation