Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetic relationships of phylum Rotifera with emphasis on the families of Bdelloidea

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated phylogenetic relationships of phylum Rotifera using cladistic analysis to uncover all most-parsimonious trees from a data set comprising 60 morphological characters of nine taxa: one Acanthocephala, six Rotifera, and two outgroups (Turbellaria, Gnathostomulida). Analysis of our matrix yielded a single most-parsimonious tree. From our analysis we conclude the following: (1) Class Digononta is paraphyletic; (2) it is still premature to reject rotiferan monophyly; (3) the classification hierarchy that best conforms to this morphologically based, cladistic analysis is similar to several traditional schemes. In spite of these results, it is significant that this analysis yielded a tree that is incongruent with those trees developed from molecular data or by using the principles of evolutionary taxonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlrichs, W. H., 1997. Epidermal ultrastructure of Seison nebaliae and Seison annulatus, and a comparison of epidermal structures within Gnathifera. Zoomorphology 117: 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, M. J., R. G. Olmstead, J. F. Smith & J. D. Palmer, 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipsacales on RbcL sequences. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 79: 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, W. T., 1959. Rotifera. In Edmondson, W. T. (ed.), Fresh-Water Biology, 2nd edn. John Wiley, N.Y.: 420–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epp, R. W. & W. M. Lewis, Jr., 1979. Sexual dimorphism in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera): evolutionary and adaptive significance. Evolution 33: 919–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D. P. & P. S. Cranston, 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? On permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garey J. R., T. J. Near, M. R. Nonnemacher & S. A. Nadler, 1996. Molecular evidence for Acanthocephala as a sub-taxon of Rotifera. J. Mol. Evol. 43: 287–292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garey J. R., A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, T. J. Near & S. A. Nadler, 1998. The evolutionary relationships of rotifers and acanthocephalans. Hydrobiologia 387/388 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 134): 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, D.M., 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. In Miyamoto, M. M. & J. Cracraft (eds), Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford University Press, N.Y.: 278–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, R. M., 1995. Are Aschelminthes pseudocoelomates or acoelomates? In Lanzavecchia, G., R. Valvassori & M. D. Candia Carnevali (eds), Body Cavities Function and Phylogeny. Selected Symposia and Monographs U.Z.I. 8 Mucchi, Modena: 41–43.

  • Koste, W., 1978. Rotatoria. Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas. 2 vols, Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, Stuttgart, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, S., 1985. Phylogenetic aspects of pseudocoelomate evolution. In Conway Morris, S., J. D. George & H. M. Platt (eds), The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates. System. Assoc. Volume 28. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.: 210–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison W. P. & D. R. Maddison, 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markevich, G. I., 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of Rotifera to other veriform taxa. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 521–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melone, G. & C. Ricci, 1995. Rotatory apparatus in bdelloids. Hydrobiologia 313/314: 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C., 1995. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogrady, T., R. L. Wallace & T. W. Snell, 1993. Rotifera. In Dumont, H. J. (ed.), Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, vol. 4. SPB Academic Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennak, R.W., 1989. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States, 3rd edn. John Wiley, New York, N.Y., U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, C., 1998. Are lemnisci and proboscis present in the Bdelloidea? Hydrobiologia 387/388 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 134): 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, R. M. & S. Tyler, 1995. Sister-group relationship of Gnathostomulida and Rotifera-Acanthocephala. Invertebr. Biol. 114: 186–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1991. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, Version 3.0s Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. L. & R. A. Colburn, 1989. Phylogenetic relationships within phylum Rotifera: orders and genus Notholca. Hydrobiologia 186/187: 311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. L., C. Ricci & G. Melone, 1996. A cladistic analysis of pseudocoelomate (aschelminth) morphology. Invertebr. Biol. 115: 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. L. & T. W. Snell, 1991. Rotifera. In Thorp J. & A. Covich (eds), Ecology and Classifications of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, ch. 8. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.: 187–248.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melone, G., Ricci, C., Segers, H. et al. Phylogenetic relationships of phylum Rotifera with emphasis on the families of Bdelloidea. Hydrobiologia 387, 101–107 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017057619574

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017057619574

Navigation