Abstract
Research and theory on medical technologysuggests that, for many expectant mothers, medicalintervention in pregnancy and childbirth results infeelings of alienation from their bodies and a lack ofcontrol over the childbirth experience. Few studies,however, examine the influence of medical interventionon the expectant father's experience of this significantlife event. In this study, we compare expectant fathers' and mothers' experiences with medicaltechnology during pregnancy and childbirth. In-depthinterviews were conducted with 15 primarily White,middle-class, married couples prior to and after the birth of their first child. Our findings revealdifferences in the impact of medical technology onexpectant mothers' and fathers' perceptions ofinvolvement and control over pregnancy andchildbirth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 209–232.
Davis-Floyd, R. E. (1992). Birth as an American rite of passage. Berke ley: University of California Press.
Davis-Floyd, R. E. (1994). The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 1125–1140.
Doyle, J. A. (1995). The male experience. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.
Gabe, J., & Calnan, M. (1989). The limits of medicine: Women's perception of medical technology. Social Science and Medicine, 28, 223–232.
Ferketich, S. L., & Mercer, R. T. (1989). Men's health status during pregnancy and early fatherhood. Research in Nursing and Health, 12, 137–148.
Jordan, P. L. (1990). Laboring for relevance: Expectant and new fatherhood.Nursing Research, 39, 11–16.
LaRossa, R. (1997). The modernization of fatherhood: A social and political history.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Have n, CT: Yale University Press.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Martin, E. (1992). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.
May, K. A. (1982). Three phases of father involvement in pregnancy. Nursing Research, 31, 337–342.
Peterson, G. H., Leiderman, L. E., & Herbert, P. (1979). The role of some birth re lated variables in father attachment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49, 330–338.
Riessman, C.K. (1983).Women and medicalization:A new perspective. Social Policy, 14, 3–18.
Rothman, B. K. (1978). Childbirth as negotiated reality. Symbolic Interaction, 1, 124–137.
Rothman, B. K. (1986). The tentative pregnancy. New York: Viking.
Rothman, B. K. (1989). Recreatin g motherhood: Ideology and technology in a patriarchal society. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Rothman, B. K. (1991). In labor: Women and power in the birthplace. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Sandelowski, M. (1994). Separate, but less unequal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood. Gender and Society, 8, 230–245.
Starr, P. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Sullivan, D. A.,& Weitz, R. (1988). Labor pains: Modern midwives and home birth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, K., Umberson, D. Medical Technology and Childbirth: Experiences of Expectant Mothers and Fathers. Sex Roles 41, 147–168 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018898027379
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018898027379