Skip to main content
Log in

The Transition from Medicaid Fee-for-Service to Managed Care Among Private Practitioners in New York City: Effect on Immunization and Screening Rates

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the association between participation in Medicaid managed care and up-to-date coverage for childhood immunizations and screenings among private practice physicians serving New York City's poorest neighborhoods. Method: A random sample of 2174 children 3–35 months of age was drawn from 60 physician practices in 1995, and a cross-sectional analysis was used to compare up-to-date status for immunizations, and lead and anemia screening tests, for children cared for by managed care and nonmanaged care physicians. In 1996, an independent sample of 2380 children from the same practices was used to compare up-to-date status for individual children enrolled in Medicaid managed care and children predominantly enrolled in traditional fee-for-service Medicaid. Information from physician interviews augmented chart review data. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression were used. Results: Physicians who participate in Medicaid managed care and those who do not had equal up-to-date coverage for immunizations (41.0 vs. 36.9%, p = .527), and lead (46.8 vs. 38.7%, p = .199) and anemia screening (63.2 vs. 56.5%, p = .272). Measures of the process of care were also similar for the two groups of physicians. Children themselves enrolled in Medicaid managed care appeared significantly more likely to be up-to-date than their nonmanaged care counterparts for immunizations (OR = 1.53, p = .027) and anemia screening (OR = 2.95, p = .000). Conclusions: Participation in managed care does not seem to change physicians' overall preventive care practice behavior. Available data did not reveal major differences in demographics or health status between individual children enrolled in managed care and those not enrolled. That children enrolled in managed care were better immunized and screened than those in fee-for-service Medicaid suggests that physicians receiving compensation under two payment systems may treat children differently depending on each child's mode of reimbursement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Health Care Financing Administration. Medicaid managed care enrollment report. Washington, HCFA, Office of Managed Care, 30 June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sparer, MS, Medicaid managed care and the health reform debate: Lessons from New York and California. J Health Politics, Policy Law, 21:433–460, 1996 Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Illinois may scrap 1115 Medicaid waiver. State Health Watch: The Newsletter on State Health Care Reform 1997;4(10) October.

  4. United Hospital Fund. Medicaid Managed Care Currents 1996;1(3):1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. United Hospital Fund. Medicaid Managed Care Currents 1997;2(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu J, Rosenbaum S. Medicaid and childhood immunizations: A national study. Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Physician's Payment Review Commission. Annual report, 1994. Washington, DC: Physician Payment Review Commission, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. New York State Department of Health, Office of Managed Care. 1995 Quality assurance reporting requirements: A report on managed care performance. Albany: New York State Department of Health, December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy C, Fairbrother G. Medicaid managed care study: Summary of findings from Plan medical director interviews. Unpublished report submitted to the New York City Department of Health, July 1997.

  10. National Committee on Quality Assurance. Report Card Pilot Project. Washington, DC: NCQA; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. New York State Department of Health and New York State Department of Social Services. Managed care quality assurance reporting requirements. Unpublished, 1993.

  12. Fairbrother G, Hanson KL, Butts G. Medicaid Managed Care in New York: Problems and promise for childhood Immunizations. J Public Health Manage, Pract 1996;2:60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wood D, et al. Access to Infant Immunizations for poor, inner-city families: What is the impact of managed care? J Health Care Poor Underserved 1994;5:113–23.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shah-Canning D, Alpert JJ, Bauchner H. Care-seeking patterns of inner-city families using an emergency room: A three decade comparison. Med Care 1996;34:1171–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kelley MA, Perloff JD, Morris NM, Liu W. Primary care arrangements and access to care among African-American women in three Chicago communities. Women Health 1992;18:91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fairbrother G, DuMont KA, Friedman S, Lobach KS. New York City physicians serving high volumes of Medicaid children: Who are they and how do they practice? Inquiry 1995;32:345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brelloch C, Carter AB, Caress B, Goldman A. Building primary health care services in New York City's low-income communities. New York: Community Service Society of New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morehead, MA. Bronx Professional Standards Review Organization: Experiences with ambulatory care review. Bull NY Acad Med. 1982;58:127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JL, Morehead MA. Utilization and cost of ambulatory care services of Medicaid Recipients, Bronx. Am J Public Health 1984;74:1367–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stamm JB, Schimel D, Postel AH, Bellin LE. Typical diagnostic and therapeutic errors in Manhattan Shared Health Facilities. Bull NY Acad Med 1983;59:393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fairbrother G, Friedman S, DuMont K, Lobach KS. Markers for primary care: Missed opportunities to immunize and screen for lead and tuberculosis by private physicians serving large numbers of inner-city Medicaid-eligible children. Pediatrics 1997;6:785–790.

    Google Scholar 

  22. United Hospital Fund. New York City community health atlas. New York: United Hospital Fund, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fairbrother G, Hanson K, Friedman S, Butts GC. Impact of bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. Am J Public Health.

  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for Assessing Vaccination Levels of the 2-Year-Old Population in a Clinic Setting Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. October, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. General recommendations on Immunization. MMWR 1994;43(1):1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing lead poisoning in young children. Atlanta, GA: CDC, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Committee on Nutrition, American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatric nutrition handbook, 3rd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: AAP, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, Forthofer, Lorimor, Analyzing complex survey data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shah, Barnwell, Hunt, LaVange, SUDAAN user's manual: Professional software for survey data analysis for multi-stage sample designs. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. New York State Department of Health. Women, infants and children (WIC) program manual. Albany: New York State Department of Health, June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Perloff JD, Kletke PR, Neckerman KM. Physicians' Decision to limit Medicaid participation: Determinants and policy implications. J Health Politics, Policy Law 1987;12:221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Public Health Service. Healthy People 2000—National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Social Services, Public Health Service, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. July 25, 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karla L. Hanson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanson, K.L., Fairbrother, G., Kory, P. et al. The Transition from Medicaid Fee-for-Service to Managed Care Among Private Practitioners in New York City: Effect on Immunization and Screening Rates. Matern Child Health J 2, 5–14 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021837407789

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021837407789

Navigation