Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Back Extensor Muscle Endurance Test Scores in Coal Miners in Australia

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design: A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted.

Objectives: To collect normative data on back extensor endurance holding times and evaluate the discriminative validity of the Biering–Sorensen test in a group of coal miners in Australia.

Summary of Background Data: Low back pain is a common complaint among those working in the Australian coal mining industry. One test that may be predictive of first-time episodes of low back pain is the Biering–Sorensen test of back extensor endurance strength. While this test has been evaluated in overseas sedentary populations, normative data and the discriminative ability of the test have not been evaluated with coal miners.

Methods: Eighty-eight coal miners completed a questionnaire for known risk factors for low back pain, performed the Biering–Sorensen test, and undertook a test of aerobic fitness. Data analysis was performed to describe the groups and to determine whether any significant difference existed between those with a past history of low back pain and those without.

Results: Significantly lower than expected holding times were found in this group of coal miners (mean 113 s). This result was significantly lower than demonstrated in previous studies (mean 138 s, t 87 = 6.32, p < 0.001). When holding times for those with a past history of low back pain were compared with times for those with no history of low back pain, the difference was not statistically significant (t 86 = 1.56, p = 0.12), nor was there a significant difference in fitness between those with a past history of low back pain and those without (t 86 = 0.47, p = 0.64).

Discussion/Conclusions: Coal miners in Australia have lower than normal Biering– Sorensen holding times. This lower back holding time does not differ between coal miners with a past history of low back pain and those without.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. NSW Workers Compensation Statistical Bulletin 1998–1999. Workcover Authority of New South Wales.

  2. Biering-Sorensen, F. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one year period. Spine 1984; 9: 106–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G. Acute low back problems in adults. Clinical practice guideline No.14. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, USA, 1994.

  4. Seidel H, Bayer H, Brauer D. Electromyographic evaluation of back muscle fatigue with repeated sustained contractions of different strengths. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 592–602.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luoto S, Heliovaara M, Huuri H, Alaranta H. Static back endurance and the risk of low back pain. Clin Biomech 1995; 10: 323–324.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hultman G, Nordin M, Saraste H, Ohlsen H. Body Composition, endurance, strength, cross-sectional area, and density of MM erector spinier in men with and without low back pain. J Spinal Disord 1993; 6(2): 114–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simmonds M, Olsen S, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee C, Novy D, Radwan H. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998; 23: 2412–2421.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Latimer J, Maher C, Refshauge, K, Calaco I. The reliability and validity of the Biering-Sorensen test in asymptomatic subjects and subjects reporting current or previous non-specific low back pain. Spine 1999; 24(20): 2085–2090.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nordin M, Kahanovitz N, Verderame R, Parnianpour M, Yabut S, Viola K, Greenidge N, Mulvihill M. Normal trunk muscle strength and endurance in women and the effect of exercises and electrical stimulation, Part 1: Normal endurance and trunk muscle strength in 101 women. Spine 1987; 12(2): 105–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McGill S, Childs A, Liebenson C. Endurance times for low back stabilisation exercises: Clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 941–944.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kenney W, Humphrey R, Bryant C. (eds.). ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Baltimore, MD: William Watkins, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Croft P, Papageorgiou A, Ferry S, Thomas E, Jayson M, Silman A. Psychologic distress and low back pain. Evidence from a prospective study in the general population. Spine 1996; 20: 2731–2737.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nicolaisen T, Jorgensen K. Trunk strength, back muscle endurance and low back trouble. Scand J Rehabili Med 1985; 17: 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliovaara M, Soukka A, Harju R. Non-dynamometric trunk performance tests: Reliability and normative data. Scand J Rehabil Med 1994; 26: 211–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Holmstrom E, Moritz U, Andersson M. Trunk muscle strength and back muscle endurance in construction workers with and without low back pain disorders. Scand J Rehabili Med 1992; 24: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Battie M, Bigos M. A prospective study of the role of cardiovascular risk factors and fitness in industrial back pain complaints. Spine 1989; 14: 141–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Biering–Sorensen F. Medical, social and occupational history as risk indicators for low back trouble in a general population. Spine 1986; 11: 720–725.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Biering–Sorensen F. Risk indicators for low back trouble. Scand J Rehabili Med 1989; 21: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bigos S. A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine 1991; 16: 1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Macfarlane G. Employment and physical work activities as predictors of future low back pain. Spine 1997; 22: 1143–1149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Papageorgiou A. Psychosocial Factors in the workplace–-Do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Spine 1997; 22: 1137–1142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jorgensen K, Nicolaisen T. Trunk extensor endurance: Determination and relation to low back pain trouble. Ergonomics 1987; 30(2): 259–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brooks GA, Fahey TD, White TP. Exercise testing and prescription. In: Brooks GA, Fahey TD, White TP. Exercise physiology. Human bioenergetics and its application, 2nd edn. New York: McMillan 1995, pp. 562–596.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Golding L, Myers C, Sinning W. Y's way to physical fitness, 3rd edn. Champaign, Il: Human Kinetics, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lysens R, de Weerdt W, Nieuwboer A. Factors associated with injury proneness. Sports Med 1991; 12(5): 281–289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. St Pierre P, Gardiner PF. The effect of immobilisation and exercise on muscle function: A review. Physiother Can 1987; 39(1): 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Waddell G. The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Latikka P, Battie MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE. Correlations of isokinetic and psychophysical back lift and static back endurance tests in men. Clin Biomec 1995; 10(6): 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cady L, Bischoff D, O'Connell E, Thomas P, Allan J. Strength and fitness and subsequent back injuries in firefighters. J Occup Med 1979; 21(4): 269–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation (ACC) and the National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability—New Zealand. Risk factors for long term disability and work loss. Guide to assessing yellow flags in acute low back pain, 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Mark Stewart, Jane Latimer & Michael Jamieson

Authors
  1. Mark Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jane Latimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Jamieson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, M., Latimer, J. & Jamieson, M. Back Extensor Muscle Endurance Test Scores in Coal Miners in Australia. J Occup Rehabil 13, 79–89 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022547714552

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022547714552

Search

Navigation