Abstract
The lack of definitional consistency about domestic violence and the absence of a well-validated comprehensive abuse screening questionnaire have been major methodological flaws in domestic violence research. While there are several screening questionnaires in use, they either are narrowly defined and do not have discrete measures of physical, emotional, and sexual abuse or have not been validated on both abused and nonabused samples. This study presents the development and preliminary validation of a new partner abuse screening questionnaire (Composite Abuse Scale; CAS). Items measuring the three areas of partner abuse were extracted from four published scales: the Conflict Tactics Scale, Measure of Wife Abuse, Inventory of Spouse Abuse, and Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. A survey using these items was sent to all nurses working at a large Australian public, inner-city teaching hospital. Factor analyses of the responses of 427 participants revealed four dimensions: Severe Combined Abuse, Emotional Abuse, Physical Abuse, and Harassment. Preliminary evidence is presented on validity and a high scale reliability is reported fof each subscale.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abramson, J. H. (1990). Survey Methods in Community Medicine, Churchill Livingstone, New York.
Alexander, R. (1993). Wife-battering—An Australian perspective. J. Family Violence 8: 229–251.
Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newberry Park, CA, pp. 11–25.
Candib, L. M. (1989). Violence against women: No more excuses. Family Med. 21: 339–341.
Candib, L. M. (1990). Naming the contradiction: Family medicine's failure to face violence against women. Family Commun. Health 13: 47–57.
Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1992). Knowledge and social change. In Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (eds.), Women, Violence and Social Change, Routledge, London, pp. 251–283.
Hoff, L. A. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.), Collaborative Feminist Research and the Myth of Objectivity, Sage, Newberry Park, CA, pp. 269–281.
Hudson, W., and McIntosh, S. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions. J. Marriage Family 43: 873–888.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. J. Marriage Family 57: 283–294.
Koss, M. (1990). The Women's Mental Health Research Agenda. Am. Psychol. 45: 374–380.
Loring, M. T. (1994). Emotional Abuse Lexington Books, New York.
McLennan, W. (1996) Womens Safety in Australia Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.
Neidig, P. H., and Freidman, D. H. (1984). Spouse Abuse: A Treatment Program for Couples Research Press, IL.
Rodenberg, F., and Fantuzzo, J. (1993). The measure of wife abuse: Steps toward the development of a comprehensive assessment technique. J. Family Violence 8: 203–217.
Sassetti, M. R. (1993). Domestic violence. Primary Care 20: 289–304.
Saunders, D. G. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse or mutual combat. A feminist perspective on the empirical findings. In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse Sage, Newberry Park, CA, pp. 91–113.
Statulevicius, E. (1991). Measuring Incidence of Domestic Violence: An Investigation of Gender Differences and Methodologically Flawed Research Unpublished honours thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Straus, M. A. (1990). Injury and frequency of assault and the “representative sample fallacy” in measuring wife beating and child abuse. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptation in 8145 Families Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 75–90.
Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. J. Marriage Family 48: 465–479.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1981). Violence in the home. In Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (eds.), Behind Closed Doors. Violence in the American Family Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 4–28.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., and Sugarman, D. (1996). The Revised Conflicts Tactics Scale (CTS2)—Development and preliminary psychometric data. J. Family Issues 17: 283–316.
Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics Harper Collins, New York.
Tolman, R. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence Victims 4: 159–177.
Yegidis, B. L. (1989). Abuse Risk Inventory for Women Mind Garden, Palo Alto, CA.
Yllo, K. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power and violence. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence Sage, Newberry Park, CA, pp. 47–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hegarty, K., Sheehan, M. & Schonfeld, C. A Multidimensional Definition of Partner Abuse: Development and Preliminary Validation of the Composite Abuse Scale. Journal of Family Violence 14, 399–415 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022834215681
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022834215681