Abstract
Sibling interaction effects are suggested by a difference in phenotypic variance between mono-zygotic (MZ) twins and dizygotic (DZ) twins, and a pattern of twin correlations that is inconsistent with additive genetic influences. Notably, negative sibling interaction will result in MZ correlations which are more than twice as high as DZ correlations, a pattern also seen in the presence of genetic dominance. Negative sibling interaction effects have been reported in most genetic studies on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and related phenotypes, while the presence of genetic dominance is not always considered in these studies. In the present paper the statistical power to detect both negative sibling interaction effects and genetic dominance is explored. Power calculations are presented for univariate models including sources of variation due to additive genetic influences, unique environmental influences, dominant genetic influences and a negative sibling interaction (i.e., contrast effect) between phenotypes of twins. Parameter values for heritability and contrast effects are chosen in accordance with published behavior genetic studies on ADHD and associated phenotypes. Results show that when both genetic dominance and contrast effects are truly present and using a classical twin design, genetic dominance is more likely to go undetected than the contrast effect. Failure to detect the presence of genetic dominance consequently gives rise to slightly biased estimates of additive genetic effects, unique environmental effects, and the contrast effect. Contrast effects are more easily detected in the absence of genetic dominance. If the significance of the contrast effect is evaluated while also including genetic dominance, small contrast effects are likely to go undetected, resulting in a relatively large bias in estimates of the other parameters. Alternative genetic designs, such as adding pairs of unrelated siblings reared together to a classical twin design, or adding non-twin siblings to twin pairs, greatly enhances the statistical power to detect contrast effects as well as the power to distinguish between genetic dominance and contrast effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovitch, R., Carter, C., and Lando, B. (1979). Sibling interaction in the home. Child Dev. 50: 997-1003.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Bekker, P. A., Merckens, A., and Wansbeek, T. J. (1993). Identification, equivalent models, and computer algebra. Burlington, VT: Academic Press.
Boomsma, D. I. (1998). Twin registers in Europe: An overview. Twin Res. 1: 34-51.
Carey, G. (1986). Sibling imitation and contrast effects. Behav. Genet. 16: 319-341.
Carey, G. (1992). Twin imitation for antisocial behavior: Implications for genetic and family environment research. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 101: 18-25.
Eaves, L. J. (1972). Computer simulation of sample size and experimental design in human psychogenetics. Psychol. Bull. 77: 144-152.
Eaves, L. J. (1976). A model for sibling effects in man. Heredity 36: 205-214.
Eaves, L. J., Rutter, M., Silberg, J. L., Shillady, L., Maes, H., and Pickles, A. (2000). Genetic and environmental causes of covariation in interview assessments of disruptive behavior in child and adolescent twins. Behav. Genet. 30: 321-334.
Eaves, L. J., Silberg, J. L., Maes, H. H., Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Rutter, M., Neale, M. C., Reynolds, C. A., Erikson, M. T., Heath, A. C., Loeber, R., Truett, K. R., and Hewitt, J. K. (1997). Genetics and developmental psychopathology: 2. The main effects of genes and environment on behavioral problems in the Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 38: 965-980.
Garcia, M. M., Shaw, D. S., Winslow, E. B., and Yaggi, K. E. (2000). Destructive sibling conflict and the development of conduct problems in young boys. Dev. Psychol. 36: 44-53.
Gjone, H., Stevenson, J., and Sundet, J. M. (1996). Genetic influence on parent-reported attention-related problems in a Norwegian general population twin sample. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 35: 588-596.
Heck, A. (1997). Introduction to MAPLE (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hewitt, J. K., and Heath, A. C. (1988). A note on computing the chisquare noncentrality parameter for power analyses. Behav. Genet. 18: 105-108.
Hudziak, J. J., Rudiger, L. P., Neale, M. C., Heath, A. C., and Todd, R. D. (2000). A twin study of inattentive, aggressive and anxious/depressed behaviors. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 39: 469-476.
Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.
Kuntsi, J., Gayán, J., and Stevenson, J. (2000). Parents' and teachers' ratings of problem behaviours in children: genetic and contrast effects. Twin Res. 3: 251-258.
Levy, F., Hay, D. A., McStephen, M., Wood, C., and Waldman, I. (1997). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. A category or a continuum? Genetic analysis of a large-scale twin study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 36: 737-744.
Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Kearsey, M. J., and Davies, P. (1978). The power of the classical twin study. Heredity 40: 97-116.
Martin, N., Scourfield, J., and McGuffin, P. (2002). Observer effects and heritability of childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Br. J. Psychiatry 180: 260-265.
Nadder, T. S., Silberg, J. L., Eaves, L. J., Maes, H. H., and Meyer, J. M. (1998). Genetic effects on ADHD symptomatology in 7-to 13-year-old twins: Results from a telephone survey. Behav. Genet. 28: 83-100.
Nadder, T. S., Silberg, J. L., Rutter, M., Maes, H. H., and Eaves, L. J. (2001). Comparison of multiple measures of ADHD symptomatology: A multivariate genetic analysis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 42: 475-486.
Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., and Maes, H. H. (1999). Mx: Statistical Modeling. Box 126 MCV, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry. 5th ed.
Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Neale, M. C., and Stevenson, J. (1989). Rater bias in the EASI Temperament Scales: A twin study. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56: 446-455.
Patterson, G. R. (1984). Siblings: Fellow travelers in coercive family processes. In: Blanchard, R. J. (ed.). Advances in the study of aggression, pp. 174-213. New York: Academic Press.
Posthuma, D., and Boomsma, D. I. (2000). A note on the statistical power in extended twin designs. Behav. Genet. 30: 147-158.
Price, T. S., Simonoff, E., Waldman, I., Asherson, P., Curran, S., and Plomin, R. What is stable about hyperactive behaviors in preschool children is genetic: Implications for molecular genetic studies. Submitted.
Rhee, S. H., Waldman, I. D., Hay, D. A., and Levy, F. (1999). Sex differences in genetic and environmental influences on DSMIII-R Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 108: 24-41.
Rietveld, M. J. H., Hudziak, J. J., Bartels, M., van Beijsterveldt, G. C. M., and Boomsma, D. I. (2003) Heritability of attention problems in children: I. Cross-sectional results from age 3 to 12. Neuropsychiat. Genet. 1176: 102-113.
Rowe, D. C., Rodgers, J. L., and Meseck-Bushey, S. (1992). Sibling delinquency and the family environment: Shared and unshared influences. Child Dev. 63: 59-67.
Saudino, K. J., Cherny, S. S., and Plomin, R. (2000). Parent ratings of temperament in twins: explaining the ‘too low’ DZ correlations. Twin Res. 3: 224-233.
Schmitz, S., Cherny, S. S., and Fulker, D. W. (1998). Increase in power through multivariate analyses. Behav. Genet. 28: 357-364.
Schmitz, S., Fulker, D. W., and Mrazek, D. A. (1995). Problem behavior in early and middle childhood: An initial behavior genetic analysis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 36: 1443-1458.
Segal, N. (2000). Virtual twins: new findings on within-family environmental influences on intelligence. J. Edu. Psychol. 92: 442-448.
Sherman, D. K., Iacono, W. G., and McGue, M. K. (1997). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder dimensions. A twin study of inattention and impulsivity-hyperactivity. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 36: 745-753.
Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Hervas, A., Silberg, J. L., Rutter, M., and Eaves, L. (1998). Genetic influences on childhood hyperactivity: Contrast effects imply parental rating bias, not sibling interaction. Psychol. Med. 28: 825-837.
Spinath, F. M., and Angleitner, A. (1998). Contrast effects in Buss and Plomin's EAS questionnaire: a behavioral-genetic study on early developing personality traits assessed through parental ratings. Pers. Individ. Diff. 25: 947-963.
Stevenson, J. (1992). Evidence for a genetic etiology in hyperactivity in children. Behav. Genet. 22: 337-344.
Thapar, A., Harrington, R., Ross, K., and McGuffin, P. (2000). Does the definition of ADHD affect heritability? J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 39: 1528-1536.
Thapar, A., Hervas, A., and McGuffin, P. (1995). Childhood hyperactivity scores are highly heritable and show sibling competition effects: Twin study evidence. Behav. Genet. 25: 537-544.
Van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Verhulst, F. C., Molenaar, P. C. M., and Boomsma, D. I. (submitted). The genetic basis of problem behavior in 5-year-old Dutch twin pairs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rietveld, M.J.H., Posthuma, D., Dolan, C.V. et al. ADHD: Sibling Interaction or Dominance: An Evaluation of Statistical Power. Behav Genet 33, 247–255 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023490307170
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023490307170