Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Late Prenatal Care Initiation by African American Women in Washington, DC

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify the determinants of late prenatal care (PNC) initiation among minority women in Washington, DC. Methods: DC-resident, African American women (n = 303) were recruited at 14 PNC facilities, representing the various types of PNC facilities located in DC: 4 hospital-based clinics, 5 community-based clinics, and 5 private practices. The women were interviewed at their first prenatal care visits to determine their perceptions of 63 barriers, motivators and facilitators influencing PNC initiation; substance use; and sociodemographic background. PNC initiation was classified as early (prior to the 20th week of gestation) or late (after the 20th week of gestation). The responses of women who initiated PNC early versus late were compared using bivariate and multivariate statistical procedures. Classification and Regression Trees analysis was used to identify groups at risk of late initiation. Results: Variables contributing to late PNC initiation included maternal age not between 20 and 29 years, unemployment, no history of previous abortions, consideration of abortion, lack of money to pay for PNC, and no motivation to learn how to protect ones health. Three risk groups for late PNC initiation included 1) women considering abortion and not employed outside their homes; 2) women not considering abortion who had no previous abortion experience; and 3) teenagers not considering abortion and with no previous abortions. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that psychosocial barriers are more important than structural barriers. Of the psychosocial barriers, the major determinants of late PNC initiation were consideration of abortion and previous abortion experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sloane HI, Hatcher BJ. Public health initiatives: Reducing infant mortality in the District of Columbia. Washington, DC: Office of Maternal and Child Health, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Births: Final data for 2000. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2002;50:1-102.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu GG. Birth outcomes and the effectiveness of prenatal care. Health Serv Res 1998;32(6):805-23.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu GG. On the issues of the effectiveness of prenatal care: A reply. Health Serv Res 1999;34:1074-82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rooks JP. Benefits and limitations of prenatal care. JAMA 1998;280:2072-3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberg KD. Benefits and limitations of prenatal care. JAMA 1998;280:2072.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoyert DL, Arias E, Smith BL, Murphy SL, Hochanek MA. Deaths: Final data for 1999. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2001;49:1-116.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Institute of Medicine. Committee to study the Prevention of Low Birthweight. Preventing low birth weight. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kyei-Aboagye K, Vragovic O, Chong D. Birth outcome in incarcerated, high-risk, pregnant women. J Reprod Med 2000;45:190-4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joyce T. Impact of augmented prenatal care on birth outcomes of Medicaid recipients in New York City. J Health Econ 1999;18:31-67.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kukko H, Halmesmaki E. Prenatal care and counseling of female drug-abusers: Eeffects on drug abuse and perinatal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:22-6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lowry LW, Beikirch P. Effect of comprehensive care on pregnancy outcomes. Appl Nurs Res 1998;11:55-61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Entry into prenatal care—United States, 1989–1997. MMWR 2000;49:393-8.

  14. Ahmed F, McRae JA, Ahmed N. Factors associated with not receiving adequate prenatal care in an urban black population: Program planning implications. Soc Work Health Care 1990;14:107-23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Joseph CLM. Identification of factors associated with delayed antenatal care. J Natl Med Assoc 1989;81:57-63.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kinsman S, Slap G. Barriers to adolescent prenatal care. J Adolesc Health 1992;13:146-54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. LiaHoagberg B, Rode P, Skovholt CJ, Oberg CN, Berg C, Mullet S, Choi T. Barriers and motivators to prenatal care among low-income women. Soc Sci Med 1990;30:487-95.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller CL, Margolis LH, Schwethelm B, Smith S. Barriers to implementation of a prenatal care program for low income women. Am J Public Health 1989;79:62-6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scupholme A, Robertson EG, Kamons AS. Barriers to prenatal care in a multiethnic, urban sample. J Nurse Midwifery 1991;36:111-6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. St. Clair PA, Smeriglio VL, Alexander CS, Celentano DD. Social network structure and prenatal care utilization. Med Care 1989;27:823-32.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kleinbaum DG. Logistic regression: A self-learning text, 1st edn. New York: Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thrasher RP. CART: A recent advance in tree-structured list segmentation methodology. JDM 1991;5:35-47.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wambach KG. The utility of tree-generating statistics in applied social work research. Eval Program Plann 1999;22:375-84.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Steinberg D, Colla P. CART—Classification and regression trees: Supplementary manual for Windows. San Diego, CA: Salford Systems, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brook RJ, Brook JA. Sequential tree method of examining the relationship between job stress and mental health. Percept Mot Skills 1995;80:287-90.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Banks DL. Patterns of oppression: An exploratory analysis of human-rights data. J Am Stat Assoc 1989;84:674-81.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang H, Holford T, Bracken MB. A tree-based method of analysis for prospective studies. Stat Med 1996;15:37-49.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dabrow SM, Merrick CL, Conlon M. Adolescent girl's attitudes toward contraceptive subdermal implants. J Adolesc Health 1995;16:360-6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Barnes GM, Welte JW, Dintcheff B. Drinking among subgroups in the adult population of New York State: A classification analysis using CART. J Stud Alcohol 1991;52:338-44.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mehta C, Patel N. StatXact 4 for Windows: Statistical software for exact nonparametric inferences. Cambridge, MA: CYTEL Software Corporation, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wiemann CM, Berenson AB, Garcia-del Pino L, McCombs SL. Factors associated with adolescents' risk for late entry into prenatal care. Fam Plann Perspect 1997;29:273-6.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Enderlein MC, Stephenson PA, Holt VL, Hickock D. Health status and timing of onset of prenatal care: Is there an association among low-income women? Birth 1994;21:71-6.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dietz PM, Gazmararian JA, Goodwin MM, Bruce FC, Johnson CH, Rochat RW. Delayed entry into prenatal care: Effect of physical violence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:221-4.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lee SH, Grubbs LM. Pregnant teenagers' reasons for seeking or delaying prenatal care. Clin Nurs Res 1995;4:38-49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Byrd TL, Mullen PD, Selwyn BJ, Lorimor R. Initiation of prenatal care by low-income Hispanic women in Houston. Public Health Rep 1996;111:536-40.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Piper JM, Mitchel EF, Ray Wa. Presumptive eligibility for pregnant Medicaid enrollees: Its effects on prenatal care and perinatal outcome. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1626-30.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meikle SF, Orleans M, Leff M, Shain R, Gibbs RS. Women's reasons for not seeking prenatal care: Racial and ethnic factors. Birth 1995;22:81-6.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nothnagle M, Narchi K, Egerter S, Braveman P. Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California. Matern Child Health J 2000;4:251-9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Institute of Medicine. Brown S (editor). Prenatal care: Reaching mothers, reaching infants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Goldenberg RL, Patterson E, Freese M. Maternal demographic, situational and psychosocial factors and their relationship to enrollment in prenatal care: A review of the literature. Women Health 1992;19:133-51.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Teagle SE, Brindis CD. Perceptions of motivators and barriers to public prenatal care among first-time and follow-up adolescent patients and their providers. Matern Child Health J 1998;2:15-24.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Curry M. Factors associated with inadequate prenatal care. J Community Health Nurs 1990;74:245-52.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lia-Hoagberg B, Rode P, Skovholt CJ, Oberg CN, Berg C, Mullett S, Choi T. Barriers and motivators to prenatal care among low-income women. Soc Sci Med 1990;30:487-95.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Krulewitch C, Bishop V, Long D, Hatcher B. Why women delay initiation of prenatal care. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Surveillance Report. District of Columbia Office of Maternal and Child Health, 1995.

  47. Millar WJ, Wadhera S, Henshaw SK. Repeat abortions in Canada. Fam Plann Perspect 1997;29:20-4.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Boggs KU, McLeod J, Stubbs TM. Barriers to prenatal care in Mecklenburg County: A study of 500 women. NCMJ 1995;56:159-63.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Burks JA. Factors in the utilization of prenatal services by low-income Black women. Nurse Pract 1992;17:34, 46, 49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan A. Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, A.A., El-Khorazaty, M.N., Hatcher, B.J. et al. Determinants of Late Prenatal Care Initiation by African American Women in Washington, DC. Matern Child Health J 7, 103–114 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023816927045

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023816927045

Navigation