Abstract
Aim: To test whether the original factor structure of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) can be replicated in Nordic patients and English speaking patients. Patients and methods: Clinical trial patients with heartburn without esophagitis completed the Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish and Danish versions (n = 634) and the English version (n = 1185). The factor structure was examined using models generated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The exploratory factor analysis suggested that the original five-factor structure solution was the most optimal. The Nordic versions explained 67% and the English version 72% of the variance. The factor loading of 22 out of 25 items was >0.55. In the confirmatory factor analysis, because of the sample size, only the Swedish and Norwegian data were used. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated an acceptable goodness of fit of the five-factor solution to the data with a goodness of fit index of 0.85 in the Swedish, 0.77 in the Norwegian and 0.91 in the English speaking population. The internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.70 to 0.94 (in the Nordic translations) and from 0.85 to 0.92 (in the English version), supporting the homogeneity of the items within the factors and thus their construct validity. The QOLRAD distinguished severity and frequency of heartburn, thereby documenting its known-group validity to distinguish between groups of patients. Conclusions: The factor structure and dimensionality of the English version and the Swedish and Norwegian translations of the QOLRAD could be replicated by the exploratory and confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis. The QOLRAD is a valid and reliable instrument for use in clinical trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Holtmann G, Talley NJ. Functional dyspepsia. Current treatment recommendations. Drugs 1993; 45: 918–930.
Spechler SJ. Epidemiology and natural history of gastrooesophageal reflux disease. Digestion 1992; 51: 24–29.
Talley NJ, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR. Impact of functional dyspepsia on quality of life. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: 584–589.
Leidy NK, Revicki DA, Genesté B. Recommendations for evaluating the validity of quality of life claims for labeling and promoting. Value Health 1999; 2: 113–127.
Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483.
Wiklund IK, Junghard O, Grace E, et al. Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia patients. Psychometric documentation of a new disease-specific questionnaire (QOLRAD). Eur J Surg Suppl 1998; 583: 41–49.
Patrick DL, Chiang YP. Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Med Care 2000; 38(9 Suppl): II14–II25.
Talley NJ, Fullerton S, Junghard O, Wiklund I. Quality of life in patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn: Reliability and sensitivity of disease-specific instruments. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96(7): 1998–2004.
Chassany O, Fullerton S, Aaronson N, Sagnier P, Marquis P. Quality of Life and regulatory issues ''ERIQA''. European guidance document for the improvement of the integration of health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessment in the drug regulatory process. August 2000.
Wiklund IK, Fullerton S, Junghard O, Talley NJ. Interpretability and meaningfulness of quality of life changes in patients with heartburn. Annual Meeting at Digestive Disease Week, The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA). San Diego, California, 2000.
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46(12): 1417–1432.
Munro BH. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. Lippincott: Philadelphia, 1997.
Cudeck R, Browne MW. Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behav Res 1983; 18: 147–167.
Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993.
Long JS. Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Preface to LISREL. Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, 1983.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334.
Norusis MJ, SPSS Inc., (eds), SPSS for Windows, Professional Statistics, Release 10.0. Chicago, ILL: SPSS Inc., 1999.
Jöreskog K, Sörbom D, du Toit S, du Toit M (eds), LISREL 8: New Statistical Features. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International (SSI), 2000.
Gustafsson JE, Stahl PA (eds), STREAMS. Users' Guide. Kungsbacka, Sweden: Electronic Printing, 2000.
Revicki DA, Sorensen S, Wu A W. Reliability and validity of physical and mental health summary scores from the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey. Med Care 1998; 36: 126–137.
Pouwer F, van der Ploeg HM, Ader HJ, Heine RJ. The well-being questionnaire: Evidence for a three-factor structure with 12 items (W-BQ12). Psychol Med 2000; 30: 455–462.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kulich, K.R., Wiklund, I. & Junghard, O. Factor structure of the Quality of life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire evaluated in patients with heartburn predominant reflux disease. Qual Life Res 12, 699–708 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025192100450
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025192100450