Skip to main content
Log in

Longitudinal Patent Analysis for Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Country, Institution and Technology Field

  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) and related areas have seen rapid growth in recent years. The speed and scope of development in the field have made it essential for researchers to be informed on the progress across different laboratories, companies, industries and countries. In this project, we experimented with several analysis and visualization techniques on NSE-related United States patent documents to support various knowledge tasks. This paper presents results on the basic analysis of nanotechnology patents between 1976 and 2002, content map analysis and citation network analysis. The data have been obtained on individual countries, institutions and technology fields. The top 10 countries with the largest number of nanotechnology patents are the United States, Japan, France, the United Kingdom, Taiwan, Korea, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Italy and Australia. The fastest growth in the last 5 years has been in chemical and pharmaceutical fields, followed by semiconductor devices. The results demonstrate potential of information-based discovery and visualization technologies to capture knowledge regarding nanotechnology performance, transfer of knowledge and trends of development through analyzing the patent documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aureka, 2002. Aureka Online Services, Aureka Systems, available at: http://www.aurigin.com/aureka online.html

  • Chen C. & R.J. Paul, 2001. Visualizing a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. IEEE Computer 34(3), 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H., A.L. Houston, R.R. Sewell & B.R. Schatz, 1998. Internet browsing and searching: User evaluation of category map and concept space techniques. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 49(7), 582–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H., C. Schuffels & R. Orwig, 1996. Internet categorization and search: A machine learning approach. J. Visual Comm. Image Represent. (Special Issue on Digital Libraries) 7(1), 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansner E. & S. North, 2000. An open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineering. Software - Practice and Experience 30(11), 1203–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield E., 1995. Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122, 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield E., 1979. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology and Humanities. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karki M.M., 1997. Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool, World Patent Inform. 19, 269–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin C., H. Chen & J.F. Nunamaker, 2000. Verifying the proximity hypothesis for self-organizing maps. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 16(3), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinlay J.D., R. Rao & S.K. Card, 1999. An organic user interface for searching citation links, In: Proceedings of the CHI'95, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 67–73.

  • Narin F., 2000. Tech-Line Background Paper, CHI Research, Inc., available at: http://www.chiresearch.com/techline/tlbp.pdf

  • Ong T.-H., H. Chen, W.-K. Sung & B. Zhu, 2003. Newsmap: A knowledge map for online news. Decision Support Systems, Special Issue on Collaborative Work and Knowledge Management in Electronic Business (in press).

  • Oppenheim C., 2000. Do patent citations count? In: Cromin, B. and Atkins, H.B. eds. The Web of Knowledge. Information Today, Inc., Medford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco M.C., R.S. Williams & P. Alivisatos, eds., 2000. Nanotechnology Research Directions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco M.C., 2001. International strategy for nanotechnology research and development. J. Nanoparticle Res. 3(5-6), 353–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch U., 1993. Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics 26, 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz E.I., 2003. Patents go global. Technol. Rev. May, 55–57.

  • Small H., 1999. Visualizing science by citation mapping. J Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 50(9), 799–812.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, Z., Chen, H., Yip, A. et al. Longitudinal Patent Analysis for Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Country, Institution and Technology Field. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5, 333–363 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025556800994

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025556800994

Navigation