Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Meiosis in Carriers of Heteromorphic Bivalents: Sex Differences and Implications for Male Fertility

  • Published:
Chromosome Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mice that are double heterozygous for the semi-identical T(1;13)70H and T(1;13)1Wa reciprocal translocations display a great variation in male fertility. The synaptic behaviour of the different translocation chromosomes of adult males was studied in relation to this parameter. Juvenile males and embryonic females (16 and 18 days old) were included for comparison. In agreement with the minor differences in the translocation breakpoint positions, two differently sized heteromorphic bivalents are formed in meiotic prophase of both sexes (a quadrivalent was never encountered). Synaptonemal complex (SC) configurations of both bivalents in either sex are characterized by a high degree of non-homologous synapsis at zygotene-early pachytene. The rate of synaptic adjustment during pachytene is dependent on the size of the heteromorphic bivalent and varies between the sexes. Differences in SC configuration and morphology of the small heteromorphic bivalent in particular exist between the sexes and between animals. In males, this correlates with different degrees of fertility. Normal SC morphology in a fully synapsed small heteromorphic bivalent is an important determinant of successful meiosis and spermatogenesis. Moreover, aberrant synapsis favours the ‘unsaturated pairing site’ model as the primary cause for male sterility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley T (1984) Application of the spreading techniques to structural heterozygotes. In: Bennett MD, Gropp A, Wolf U, eds. Chromosomes Today. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, pp 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley T (1988) G-band position effects on meiotic synapsis and crossing over. Genetics 118: 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley T (1990) Prediction of mammalian meiotic synaptic and recombinational behavior of inversion heterozygotes based on mitotic breakpoint data and the possible evolutionary consequences. Genetica 83: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley T, Cacheiro NL (1990) Correlation between meiotic behavior and breakpoints with respect to G-bands in two X-4 mouse translocations: T(X;4)7R1 and T(X;4)8R1. Cytogenet Cell Genet 53: 178–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley T, Moses MJ, Solari AJ (1981) Fine structure and behaviour of a pericentric inversion in the sand rat, Psammomys obesus. J Cell Sci 50: 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley T, Ried T, Ward DC (1994) Detection of nondisjunction and recombination in meiotic and postmeiotic cells from XYSxr [XY,Tp(Y)1Ct]mice using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 524–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley T, Plug AW, Xu J, et al. (1995) Dynamic changes in Rad51 distribution on chromatin during meiosis in male and female vertebrates. Chromosoma 104: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow C, Hirotsune S, Paylor R, et al. (1996) Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell 86: 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop DK (1994) RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 79: 1081–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borodin PM, Gorlov IP, Ladygina TY (1992) Synaptic interrelationships between the segments of the heteromorphic bivalent in double heterozygotes for paracentric inversions in chromosome 1 of the house mouse Chromosoma 101: 374–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun RE, Behringer RR, Peschon JJ, Brinster RL, Palmiter RD (1989) Genetically haploid spermatids are phenotypically diploid. Nature 337: 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne PS, Baker TG (1985) Perinatal oocyte loss in XO mice and its implications for the aetiology of gonadal dysgenesis in XO women. J Reprod Fertil 75: 633–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne PS, Mahadevaiah S, Mittwoch U (1985) A reciprocal autosomal translocation which causes male sterility in the mouse also impairs oogenesis. J Reprod Fertil 75: 647–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer P, Searle AG (1980) Summary and synthesis. Workshop on chromosomal aspects of male sterility in mammals. J Reprod Fertil 60: 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer P, Speed RM (1982) Meiosis of T70H translocation trisomic male mice. II Meiotic rate, spermatocyte interactions and fertility. Chromosoma 87: 315–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer P, de Jong JH (1989) Chromosome pairing and fertility in mice. In: Gilles CB, ed. Fertility and Chromosome Pairing: Recent Studies in Plants and Animals. Boca Raton: CRC Press, pp 37–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer P, Searle AG, van der Hoeven FA, de Rooij DG, Beechey CV (1986) Male pachytene pairing in single and double translocation heterozygotes and spermatogenic impairment in the mouse. Chromosoma 93: 326–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich AJ, de Boer P (1983) A sequential analysis of the development of the synaptonemal complex in spermatocytes of the mouse by electron microscopy using hydroxyurea and agar filtration. Genetica 61: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich AJ, Mulder RJ (1983) A light-and electron microscopic analysis of meiotic prophase in female mice. Chromosoma 88: 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dym M, Fawcett DW (1971) Further observations on the numbers of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids connected by intercellular bridges in the mammalian testis. Biol Reprod 4: 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forejt J (1974) Non-random association between a specific autosome and the X chromosome in meiosis of the male mouse: possible consequences of homologous centromeres' separation. Cytogenet Cell Genet 19: 369–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forejt J (1996) Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends Genet 12: 412–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forejt J, Gregorova S (1977) Meiotic studies of translocations causing male sterility in the mouse. I. Autosomal reciprocal translocations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 19: 159–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forejt J, Gregorova S, Goetz P (1981) XY pair associates with the synaptonemal complex of autosomal male-sterile translocations in pachytene spermatocytes of the mouse (Mus musculus). Chromosoma 82: 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel-Robez O, Rumpler Y (1994) The meiotic pairing behaviour in human spermatocytes carrier of chromosome anomalies and their repercussions on reproductive fitness. I: Inversions and insertions. A European collaborative study. Ann Genet 37: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel-Robez O, Rumpler Y (1996) The meiotic pairing behaviour in human spermatocytes carrier of chromosome anomalies and their repercussions on reproductive fitness. II: Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations. A European collaborative study. Ann Genet 39: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies CB (1989) Preface. In: Gilles CB, ed. Fertility and Chromosome Pairing: Recent Studies in Plants and Animals. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guitart M, Coll MD, Ponsa M, Egozcue J (1985) Sequential study of synaptonemal complexes in mouse spermatocytes by light and electron microscopy. Genetica 67: 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley RS, Friend SH (1996) Strange bedfellows in even stranger places: the role of ATM in meiotic cells, lymphocytes, tumors, and its functional links to p53. Genes Dev 10: 2383–2388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan KS, Holtzman DA, Plug AW et al. (1996) The Atr and Atm protein kinases associate with different sites along meiotically pairing chromosomes. Genes Dev 10: 2423–2437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluin PM, Kramer MF, de Rooij DG (1982) Spermatogenesis in the immature mouse proceeds faster than in the adult. Int J Androl 5: 282–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifschytz E, Lindsley DL (1972) The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69: 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevaiah S, Mittwoch U, Moses MJ (1984) Pachytene chromosomes in male and female mice heterozygous for the Is(7;1)40H insertion. Chromosoma 90: 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messier PE, Jean P, Richer CL (1986) Easy transfer of selected mitoses from light to electron microscopy. Cytogenet Cell Genet 43: 207–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklos GL (1974) Sex-chromosome pairing and male fertility. Cytogenet Cell Genet 13: 558–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittwoch U, Mahadevaiah SK (1992) Unpaired chromosomes at meiosis: cause or effect of gametogenic insufficiency? Cytogenet Cell Genet 59: 274–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses MJ (1980) New cytogenetic studies on mammalian meiosis. In: Serio M, Martini L, eds. Animal Models in Human Reproduction. New York: Raven Press, pp 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses MJ, Poorman PA (1981) Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. II. Synaptic adjustment in a tandem duplication. Chromosoma 81: 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses MJ, Dresser ME, Poorman PA (1984) Composition and role of the synaptonemal complex. Symp Soc Exp Biol 38: 245–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P (1997) A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chrom Res 5: 66–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Plug AW, Xu J, Reddy G, Golub EI, Ashley T (1996) Presynaptic association of Rad51 protein with selected sites in meiotic chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 5920–5924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorman PA, Moses MJ, Russell LB, Cacheiro NL (1981) Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. I. Cytogenetic observations on a tandem duplication. Chromosoma 81: 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle AG, Beechey CV, de Boer P, de Rooij DG, Evans EP, Kirk M (1983) A male-sterile insertion in the mouse. Cytogenet Cell Genet 36: 617–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed RM (1982) Meiosis in the foetal mouse ovary. I. An analysis at the light microscope level using surface-spreading. Chromosoma 85: 427–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed RM (1986) Oocyte development in XO foetuses of man and mouse: The possible role of heterologous X-chromosome pairing in germ cell survival. Chromosoma 94: 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed RM, Chandley AC (1983) Meiosis in the foetal mouse ovary. II. Oocyte development and age-related aneuploidy. Does a production line exist? Chromosoma 88: 184–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setterfield LA, Mahadevaiah S, Mittwoch U (1988a) Chromosome pairing and germ cell loss in male and female mice carrying a reciprocal translocation. J Reprod Fertil 82: 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setterfield LA, Mahadevaiah S, Mittwoch U (1988b) Pachytene pairing in relation to sperm and oocyte numbers in a male-fertile reciprocal translocation in the mouse. Cytogenet Cell Genet 49: 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terasawa M, Shinohara A, Hotta Y, Ogawa H, Ogawa T (1995) Localization of RecA-like recombination proteins on chromosomes of the lily at various meiotic stages. Genes Dev 9: 925–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tres LL (1977) Extensive pairing of the XY bivalent in mouse spermatocytes as visualized by whole-mount electron microscopy. J Cell Sci 25: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wauben-Penris PJ, van der Hoeven FA, de Boer P (1983) Chiasma frequency and nondisjunction in heteromorphic bivalents: meiotic behavior in T(1;13)70H/T(1;13)1Wa mice as compared to T(1; 13)70H/T(1;13)70H mice. Cytogenet Cell Genet 36: 547–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winking H, Reuter C, Traut W (1993) Meiotic synapsis of homogeneously staining regions (HSRs) in chromosome 1 of Mus musculus. Chromosome Res 1: 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Ashley T, Brainerd EE, et al. (1996) Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. Genes Dev 10: 2411–2422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao GQ, Deng K, Labosky PA, Liaw L, Hogan BL (1996) The gene encoding bone morphogenetic protein 8B is required for the initiation and maintenance of spermatogenesis in the mouse. Genes Dev 10: 1657–1669.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Genetics, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen Agricultural University, Dreijenlaan 2, NL-6703 HA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Antoine H. F. M. Peters & Peter de Boer

  2. Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA

    Annemieke W. Plug

Authors
  1. Antoine H. F. M. Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annemieke W. Plug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter de Boer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peters, A.H.F.M., Plug, A.W. & de Boer, P. Meiosis in Carriers of Heteromorphic Bivalents: Sex Differences and Implications for Male Fertility. Chromosome Res 5, 313–324 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CHRO.0000038762.60086.ef

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CHRO.0000038762.60086.ef

Search

Navigation