Abstract
We begin by discussing the false positive test results that arise because of cryptic relatedness and population substructure when testing a disease susceptibility locus. We extend and evaluate the Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium (HWD) method, allowing for an inbreeding coefficient (F) in a similar way that Devlin and Roeder (1999) allowed for inbreeding in a case-control study. Then we compare the HWD measure and the common direct measure of linkage disequilibrium, both when there is no population substructure (F = 0) and when there is population substructure (F ≠ 0), for a single marker. The HWD test statistic gives rise to false positives caused by population stratification. These false positives can be controlled by adjusting the test statistic for the amount of variance inflation caused by the inbreeding coefficient (F). The power loss for the HWD test that arises when controlling for population structure is much less than that which arises for the common direct measure of linkage disequilibrium. However, in the multiplicative model, the HWD test has virtually no power even when allowing for non-zero F.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacanu, S.-A., B. Devlin & K. Roeder, 2000. The power of genomic control. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66: 1933–1944.
Conti, D.V. & J.S. Witte, 2003. Hierarchical Modeling of Linkage Disequilibrium: Genetic Structure and Spatial Relations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72: 351–363.
Crow, J.F. & M. Kimura, 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetic Theory. Harper & Row, New York.
Deng, H.W., W.M. Chen & R.R. Recker, 2000. QTL fine mapping by measuring and testing for Hardy-Weinberg and linkage disequilibrium at a series of linked marker loci in extreme samples of population. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66: 1027–1045.
Denniston, C., 1967. Probability and genetic relationship. Unpublished Thesis, University of Wisconsin.
Devlin, B. & K. Roeder, 1999. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55: 997–1004.
Feder, J.N., A. Gnirke, W. Thomas, Z. Tsuchihashi, D.A. Ruddy, A. Basava, F. Dormishian, R. Domingo, M.C. Ellis, A. Fullan, L.M. Hinton, N.L. Jones, B.E. Kimmel, G.S. Kronmal, P. Lauer, V.K. Lee, D.B. Loeb, F.A. Mapa, E. McClelland, N.C. Meyer, G.A. Mintier, N. Moeller, T. Moore, E. Morikang, C.E. Prass, L. Quintana, S.M. Starnes, R.C. Schatzman, K.J. Brunke, D.T. Drayna, N.J. Risch, B.R. Bacons & R.K. Wolff, 1996. A novel MHC class I-like gene is mutated in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis. Nat. Genet. 13: 399–408.
Génin, E. & F. Clerget-Darpoux, 1996. Association studies in consanguineous populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58: 861–866.
Haldane, J.B.S., 1949. The association of characters as a result of inbreeding and linkage. Ann. Eugen. 15: 15–23.
Li, C.C., 1972. Population subdivision with respect to multiple alleles. Ann. Hum. Genet. 33: 23–29.
Meng, R.C. & D.G. Chapman, 1966. The power of chi-square tests for contingency tables. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 61: 965–975.
Nielsen, D.M., M.G. Ehms & B.S. Weir, 1998. Detecting markerdisease association by testing for Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium at a marker locus. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63: 1531–1540.
Shirahata, S., 1976. Tests for independence in infinite contingency tables. Ann. Statist. 4: 542–553.
Weir, B.S., 1996. Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
Wright, S., 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations. The Theory of Gene Frequencies, Vol. 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, K., Elston, R.C. Tests for a Disease-susceptibility Locus allowing for an Inbreeding Coefficient (F). Genetica 119, 269–281 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GENE.0000003681.02766.3c
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GENE.0000003681.02766.3c