Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improving Screening for Alcohol Use During Pregnancy: The Massachusetts ASAP Program

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To motivate prenatal care staff in public and private settings to universally screen for risk of alcohol and drug use and to conduct a brief intervention with follow-up referral when appropriate during a routine office visit. Methods: The ASAP Project methods were engagement of site staff; staff training; self-administered questionnaires embedded with a relational and broad catch screening tool; a brief intervention protocol; unique clinical decision tree/protocols for each site; identification of treatment and referral resources; and ongoing technical assistance and consultation. Sites were located in four regions of the state and included four community health centers, a network of multi-specialty private practices and a teaching hospital. Results: Across 16 sites, 118 prenatal staff were trained on use of the screening tool and 175 staff on the brief intervention. The ASAP Project resulted in 95% of pregnant women being screened for alcohol use and 77% of those screening positive for at least one risk factor receiving a brief intervention during a routine office visit. Conclusions: Screening and brief interventions for alcohol use can be delivered effectively within a routine prenatal care visit by prenatal staff by utilizing and building on existing office systems with practice staff, screening for any use not only at risk use, providing training with skills building sessions and information delivered by physicians, offering easy-to-access community treatment resources, and providing ongoing technical assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Day NL, Leech SL, Richardson GA, Cornelius MD, Robles N, Larkby C. Prenatal alcohol exposure predicts continued deficits in offspring size at 14 years of age. Alcohol Clin Exp. Res 2002;26(10):1584–91.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mattson SN, Schoenfeld AM, Riley EP. Teratogenic effects of alcohol on brain and behavior. Alcohol Res Health 2001;25(3):185–91.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morse B, Hutchins E. Reducing complications from alcohol use during pregnancy through screening. JAMWA 2000 Summer; 55(4):225–7, 240.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mick E. Smoking and Alcohol in Pregnancy: Dr. Mick replies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry December2002;41(12):1392.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richardson GA, Ryan C, Willford J, Day NL, Goldschmidt D. Prenatal alcohol and marijuana exposure: Effects on neuropsychological outcomes at 10 years. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2002;24(3):309–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zuckerman B, Bresnahan K. Developmental and behavioral consequences of prenatal drug and alcohol exposure. Pediatr Clini North Am 1991;38(6):1387–406.

    Google Scholar 

  7. FriedmannPD, McCulloughDM, ChinMH, Saitz R. Screening and intervention for alcohol problems: A national survey of primary care physicians and psychiatrists. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frank DA, Zuckerman BS, Amaro H, Aboagye K, Bauchner H, Cabral H, Fried L, Hingson R, Kayne H, Levenson SM. Cocaine use during pregnancy: Prevalence and correlates. Pediatrics 1988 Dec;82(6):888–95.

    Google Scholar 

  9. SchutzmanDL, Frankenfield-ChernicoffM, ClatterbaughHE, Singer J. Incidence of intrauterine cocaine exposure in a suburban setting. Pediatrics 1991 Oct;88(4):825–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. MorseB, Greshan S, Hutchins E. Screening for substance abuse during pregnancy: Improving care, improving health.Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roche AM, Richard GP. Doctors willingness to intervene in patient's drug and alcohol problems. Soc Sci Med 1991;33:1053–61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howell E, HeisnerN, ThorntonC, Moreno L, Chasnoff I.Third annual report: Evaluation of the demonstration to improve access to care for pregnant substance abusers. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arndt S, Schultz SK, TurveyC, Peterson A. Screening for alcoholism in the primary care setting: Are we talking to the right people? J Fam Pract 2002;51(1):41–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA). Missed opportunity: National survey of primary care physicians and patients on substance abuse. New York: Columbia University, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hack MR, Alemi F. Medicaid reimbursement of primary care providers for treatment of substance abuse disorders. In: Hack MR, Adger H, Jr. Strategic plan for interdisciplinary faculty development: Arming the nation's health professional workforce for a new approach to substance use disorders. Providence, RI: Association for Medical Education and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA), 2002:95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saitz R, Mulvey KP, Plough A. Physician unawareness of serious substance abuse. Am J Med Drug Alcohol Abuse 1997;23(3):343–54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Caldwell D, Burke N. Maternal Substance Use Assessment Methods Reference Manual: A review of screening and clinical assessment instruments for examining maternal use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs.Rockville,MD:U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Substance Abuse Preventiion, 19963. (CSAP Special Report 13).

  18. Chasnoff I, Neuman K, Thornton C, Callaghan A. Screening for substance use in pregnancy: A practical approach for the primary care physician.AmJ Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(4):752–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tuten LM, Robilotto CM, Jones HE, Lantz M, Svikis DS. Alcohol, drug use and other health behaviors in pregnant smokers and non-smokers.Baltimore,MD: John Hopkins School of Medicine, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kahn RS, Certain L, WhitakerRC.Are-examination of smoking before, during and after pregnancy. Am J Public Health 2002;92(11):1801–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Svikis D, Henningfield J, Gazaway P, Huggins G, Sosnow K, Hranicka J, Harrow C, Pickens R. Tobacco use for identifying pregnant women at risk of substance abuse. J Reprod Med 1997;42:299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hutchins E, DiPietro, J. Psychosocial risk factors associated with cocaine use during pregnancy: A case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90(1):142–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Physicians' guide to helping patients with alcohol problems. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health PublicationNo. 95-3769, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Laken MP, Hutchins E. Recruitment and retention of substance-using pregnant and parenting women: Lessons learned. Arlington,VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. ChangG. Alcohol-screening instruments for pregnant women. Alcohol Res Health 2001;25(3):204–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Foa EB, Cashman L, Jaycox L, Perry K. The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The posttraumatic diagnostic scale. Psychol Assess 1997;9(4):445–51.

    Google Scholar 

  27. NHP/Beacon Behavioral Health Program (1998). Pediatric Screening Guideline Draft, Boston, MA: Beacon Health Strategies.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tourangeau R, SmithTW.Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format and question context. Public Opin Q 1996;60:275–304.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aquilino WS. Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use. Public Opin Q 1994;58:210–40.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP), Division of Demonstrations for High-Risk Populations. Maternal substance use assessment methods reference manual: A review of screening and clinical assessment instruments for examining maternal use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs: CSAP special report 13. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993. DHHS Publication No. SMA 93-2059.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hatch EE, Bracken MB. Effect of marijuana use in pregnancy on fetal growth. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:986–99.

    Google Scholar 

  32. MacGregor SN, Keith LG, Chasnoff IJ, Rosner MA, Chisum GM, Shaw P, Minogue JP. Cocaine use during pregnancy: Adverse perinatal outcome: Adverse perinata outcoum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:686–690.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shiono PH, Klebanoff MA, Nugent RP, Cotch MF, Wilkins DG, Rollins DE, Carey JC, Behrman RE. The impact of cocaine and marijuana use on low birth weight and preterm birth: Amulticenter study.AmJObstet Gynecol 1995;172(1, Pt 1):19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  34. ZuckermanB, FrankDA, Hingson R, AmaroH, LevensonSM, Kayne H, Parker S, Vinci R, Aboagye K, Fried LE, Cabral H, Timperi R, Bauchner H. Effects of maternal marijuana and cocaine use on fetal growth. N Engl J Med 1989;320:762–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Streisguth AP, Sampson P, Barr H. Neurobehavioral doseresponse effects of prenatal alcohol exposure in humans from infancy to adulthood. Ann NY Acad Sci 1989;562:145–58.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chasnoff IJ, Anson A, Hatcher R, Stenson H, Iaukea K, Randolph L. Prenatal exposure to cocaine and other drugs: Outcome at four to six years. In: Harvey JA, Kosofsky BE, editors. Cocaine effects on developing the brain.New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1998:314–28.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Little RE, Youth A, Streissguth AP, Uhl CN. Prevention of fetal alcohol effects: Effectiveness of a demonstration project. In: R. Porter, M. O'Connor, and J. Whelan (Eds.), CIBA Foundation Symposium 105: Mechanisms of alcohol damage in utero, (London: Pitman 1984), pp. 2524–74.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chasnoff IJ, Griffith DR, MacGregor S, Dirkes K, Burns KA. Temporal patterns of cocaine use in pregnancy: Perinatal outcome. JAMA 1989;161:1741–4.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fleming MF, Barry KL, Manwell LB, Johnson K, London R. Brief physician advice for problem drinkers: A randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices. JAMA 1997;277(13):1039–45.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Moyer A, Finney JW, Swearingen CE, Vergun P. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: A meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment seeking populations. Addiction 2002;97:279–92.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Samet JH, Rollnick S, Barnes H. Beyond CAGE:Abrief clinical approach after detection of substance abuse. Arch Int Med 1996;156(20):2287–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Health and Recovery, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Cheryl Kennedy & Norma Finkelstein

  2. US Department of Health and Human Services/Health Resources and Services Administration/Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Rockville, Maryland

    Ellen Hutchins

  3. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, District of Columbia

    Jeanne Mahoney

Authors
  1. Cheryl Kennedy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norma Finkelstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ellen Hutchins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeanne Mahoney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, C., Finkelstein, N., Hutchins, E. et al. Improving Screening for Alcohol Use During Pregnancy: The Massachusetts ASAP Program. Matern Child Health J 8, 137–147 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MACI.0000037647.78420.e3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MACI.0000037647.78420.e3

Search

Navigation