Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a hospital-based community liaison pharmacy service in Northern Ireland

  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a hospital based community liaison pharmacy service on a range of outcomes in patients aged more than 55 years and taking more than 3 prescribed drugs, who had been admitted to the medical unit of a district general hospital in Northern Ireland.

Methods: Having recruited 243 patients, a total of 162 patients completed the full protocol (81 randomly assigned to intervention and 81 to control; mean age of control patients 75 years; mean age of intervention patients 73 years). The interventions by the community liaison pharmacist included: preparation of an accurate medication record following a full review of current medication use; medication counselling; provision of a medicines record sheet informing the patient how to take their drugs; provision of a pharmaceutical discharge letter detailing changes made to drug therapy (this was faxed to the patient's GP and community pharmacist on the day of discharge); provision of a Medicines Helpline.

Results: The key findings were as follows: problems were identified in 80% of the intervention patients' prescription charts, 49% of which related to drug omissions from the patients' domiciliary prescriptions. The GP practice record was the most accurate (mean error rate 12.6%) while the GP referral letter was the least accurate (mean error rate 47.3%) source of medication information. Drugs patients brought to hospital were also an inaccurate source (mean error rate 44.0%). The intervention group patients, when compared with control patients, had a significant reduction (P=0.005) in drug mismatch between drugs prescribed at discharge and taken at home, and had a greater knowledge of their drug regimen 10–14 days after discharge (P |Ld 0.001). The vast majority of patients (96%) felt that the provision of a medicine helpline was a useful service.

Conclusions: The study indicated clear benefits from the involvement of a hospital based community liaison pharmacist in achieving seamless pharmaceutical care between the primary and secondary healthcare settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Binyon D. Pharmaceutical Care: its impact on patient care and the hospital — community interface. Pharm J 1994; 253: 344-9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oborne A, Dodds L. Seamless pharmaceutical care: the needs of the community pharmacist. Pharm J 1994; 253: 502-6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akhtar R, Preece G, Sutcliffe I. A short drug history and identification service. Pharm J 1981; 227: 80-1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dodds L. An objective assessment of the role of the pharmacist in medication and compliance history taking. Br J Pharm Pract 1982; 4: 12-23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Higham C. Drug history taking — a role for the ward pharmacist. Pharm J 1982; 228: 302-4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gurwich E. Comparison of medication histories acquired by pharmacists and physicians. Am J Hosp Pharm 1983; 40: 1541-2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hurley S, Williams S. A comparison of medication histories obtained by a pharmacist and by doctors. Aust J Hosp Pharm 1986; 16: 267-9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCrudden E, Paloumis S, Tao M, Burke R, Pulver L, Meyer E et al. Review of pharmaceutical conducted medication histories at three teaching hospitals. Aust J Hosp Pharm 1995; 25: 261-3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duggan C, Bates I, Hough J. Discrepancies in prescribing — where do they occur. Pharm J 1996; 256: 65-7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Radley AS, Pirie K, Elliott C, Hamley J, Milne K. Transfer of information between care environments. UKCPA Symposium 1995; 88-89.

  11. Mannesse CK, Derkx FH, de Ridder MA, Man In't Veld AJ, Van der Cammen TJ. Contribution of adverse drug reactions to hospital admissions of older patients. Age Aging 2000; 29: 35-9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Col N, Fanale JE, Cronholm P. The role of medication non-compliance and adverse drug reactions in hospitalizations of the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 841-5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Winyard G. Good quality seamless care stems from overcoming organisational problems. Pharm J 1994; 253: 766.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cunningham G, Dodd TRP, Grant DJ, McMurdo MET, Richards RME. Drug related problems in elderly patients admitted to Tayside hospitals, methods for prevention and subsequent reassessment. Age Aging 1997; 26: 375-82.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tierney, AJ. Older patients experiences of discharge from hospital. Nursing Times 1994; 90: 36-9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cochrane R, Mandal A, Ledger-Scott M, Walker R. Changes in drug treatment after discharge from hospital in geriatric patients. BMJ 1992; 305: 694-6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brookes K, Scott MG, McConnell B. The benefits of a hospital based community services liaison pharmacist. Pharm World Sci 2000; 22: 33-8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Duggan C, Feldman R, Hough J, Bates I. Reducing adverse prescribing discrepancies following hospital discharge. Int J Pharm Pract 1998; 6: 77-82.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Argyle M, Newman C. An assessment of pharmacy discharge procedures and hospital communications with general practitioners. Pharm J 1996; 256: 903-5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oborne CA, Dodds LJ. The quality and quantity of drug related information provided to hospital inpatients and effects on seamless care. Pharm J 1993; 251(Suppl): R5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Penney TM. Delayed communication between hospitals and general practice: were does the problem lie? BMJ 1988; 297: 77-82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Duggan C. Medication form keeps patients out of hospital. Pharm J 2002; 268: 694.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pickrell L, Duggan C, Dhillon S. From hospital admission to discharge: an exploratory study to evaluate seamless care. Pharm J 2001; 267: 650-3.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Medcalf E. The K-Med Link. Hosp Pharm 1999; 6: 227-9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eadon H. Assessing the quality of ward pharmacists interventions. Int J Pharm Pract 1992; 1: 145-7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scott MG, McElnay JC, Burnett KM. Using bar-code technology to capture clinical intervention data in a hospital with a stand-alone pharmacy computer system. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1996; 53: 651-4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Al Mahdy H, Seymour DG. How much can elderly patients tell us about their medications? Postgrad Med J 1990; 66: 116-21.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heerdink E, Leufkens H, Koppedraaijer C, Bakker A. Information on drug use in the elderly: a comparison of pharmacy, general practitioner and patient data. Pharm World Sci 1995; 7: 20-4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miles SA, Bourns IM. Resource implications of using patients own drugs at discharge from hospital. Pharm J 1995; 254: 405-7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolas, H., Brookes, K., Scott, M. et al. Evaluation of a hospital-based community liaison pharmacy service in Northern Ireland. Pharm World Sci 26, 114–120 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAR.0000018601.11248.89

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAR.0000018601.11248.89

Navigation