Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Articles

Guidelines for Test Users: A Review of National and International Initiatives

Published Online:September 01, 2006https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.173

Abstract

Summary: The paper describes why we need guidelines on test use and why, in particular, we need international agreement on what these guidelines should be. The work of the International Test Commission (ITC) is described and the ITC's International Guidelines on Test Use are reviewed. Various other important national initiatives in Britain, Germany, The Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States are described together with the work of the European Federation of Professional Psychologists Associations (EFPPA) Standing Committee on Tests and Testing. While there is considerable agreement on what constitutes good practice in test use, there is wide diversity in the ways in which different countries have attempted to implement good practice or regulate test use. The need for guidelines and test user qualification procedures to be sufficiently flexible to accommodate innovation and change in assessment practices is stressed.

References

References

  • Ackerschott, H. (2000). Standards in testing and assessment: DIN 33430 . Paper presented at the Second International Congress on Licensure, Certification and Credentialing of Psychologists, OSLO, Norway First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing . Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • American Psychological Association (1950). Ethical standards for the distribution of psychological tests and diagnostic aids. American Psychologist, 5, 620– 626 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bartram, D. Coyne, I. (1998a). The ITC/EFPPA survey of testing and test use within Europe. In Proceedings of the British Psychological Society's occupational psychology conference (pp. 197-201). Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bartram, D. Coyne, I. (1998b). Variations in national patterns of testing and test use. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14, 249– 260 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bartram, D. Lindley, P.A. Foster, J. (1992). Review of psychometric tests for assessment in vocational training . Leicester, England: BPS Books First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bartram, D. with Anderson, N. Kellett, D. Lindley, P.A. Robertson, I. (1995). Review of personality assessment instruments (level B) for use in occupational settings . Leicester: BPS Books First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bartram, D. (1995). The development of standards for the use of psychological tests in occupational settings: The competence approach. The Psychologist, May 219– 223 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bartram, D. (1996). Test qualifications and test use in the UK: The competence approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 62– 71 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bartram, D. (1998). The need for international guidelines on standards for test use: A review of European and international initiatives. European Psychologist, 3, 155– 163 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bartram, D. (2000). Internet recruitment and selection: Kissing frogs to find princes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 261– 274 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bartram, D. (2001). The development of international guidelines on test use: The International Test Commission Project. International Journal of Testing, 1, 33– 54 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (1997). Task force for the development of guidelines for the assessment process (GAP). The International Test Commission Newsletter, 7, 16– 20 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • DeMers, S.Y. Turner, S.M. Andberg, M. Foote, W. Hough, L. Ivnik, R. Meier, S. Moreland, K. Rey-Casserly, C.M. (2000). Report of the task force on test user qualifications . Washington, DC: Practice and Science Directorates, American Psychological Association First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hambleton, R. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229– 244 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • ITC (2001). International Test Commission Directory . cwis.kub.nl/~fsw_1/itc First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lindley, P.A. with Banerji, N. Cooper, J. Drakeley, R. Smith, J.M. Robertson, I. Waters, S. (2000). Review of personality assessment instruments (Level B) for use in occupational settings (2nd ed.). Leicester: BPS Books First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muñiz, J. Prieto, G. Almeida, L. Bartram, D. (1999). Test use in Spain, Portugal and Latin American countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 151– 157 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Muñiz, J. Bartram, D. Evers, A. Boben, D. Matesic, K. Glabeke, K. Fernández-Hermida, J.R. Zaal, J.N. (in preparation) Testing practices in European countries . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tyler, B. (1986). The use of tests by psychologists: Report on a survey of British Psychological Society members. Bulletin of the International Test Commission, 22, 7– 18 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van de Vijver, F. Hambleton, R. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89– 99 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar