References
(1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
(1988). Fairness in selecting employees. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.
(1998). The ITC/EFPPA survey of testing and test use within Europe.
Proceeding of the British Psychological Society's Occupational Psychology Conference ,Eastbourne ,January .(1992) Review of psychometric tests for assessment in vocational training. Leicester, England: BPS Books.
. (1995). Review of personality assessment instruments (Level B) for use in occupational settings. Leicester: BPS Books.
(1995). The development of standards for the use of psychological tests in occupational settings: The competence approach. The Psychologist, May. 219-223.
(1996). Test qualifications and test use in the UK: The competence approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 62-71.
(1997). Use and consequences of assessments in the USA: Professional, ethical and legal issues. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 140-152.
(1987). Guidelines for educational and psychological testing. Ottawa: Canadian Psychological Association.
(1992). Psychometric tests and racial equality: A guide for employers. London: Commission for Racial Equality.
(1996). Selecting train drivers at British rail: A fair test? London: Commission for Racial Equality.
(1997). The ethical use of psychological tests: Australia. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 132-139.
(1988). Avoiding sex bias in selection testing: Guidance for employers. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
(1996). Regulations Concerning Test Qualifications and Test Use in the Netherlands. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 153-159.
(1988). Test user qualifications: A data-based approach to promoting good test use. Report for the Test User Qualifications Working Group. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(1993). Responsible test use: Case studies for assessing human behaviour. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(1997a). Task force for the development of guidelines for the assessment process (GAP). The International Test Commission Newsletter, 7, 16-20.
(1997b). Guidelines for the assessment process. European Psychologist, 2, 352-355.
(1997). Psychological testing in South Africa: Perspectives regarding ethical and fair practices. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 229-235.
(1989). Developing a code of fair testing practices in education. American Psychologist, 44, 1062-1067.
(1997). Regulation of testing practice in European French-speaking countries. The International Test Commission Newsletter, 7, 6-13.
(1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-244.
Joint Committee on Testing Practices (1988). Code of fair testing practices in education. Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Testing Practices.(1997). Supplement to guidelines for the use of psychological tests. Australian Psychological Society.
(1997). Tests and professional ethics and values in European Psychologists. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 219-228.
(1996). Improper use of tests in Sweden. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 4, 146-150.
(1995). Assessment of test user qualifications: A research-based measurement procedure. American Psychologist, 50, 14-23.
. (1991). Equal opportunities guidelines for best test practice in the use of personnel selection tests. Surrey: Author.
(1992). Responsibilities of users of standardized tests: RUST Statement Revised. Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development.
(1994). European management selection methods: A comparison of five countries. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 91-102.
(1996). Recommendations by the Canadian Psychological Association for improving the North American Safeguards that help protect the public against test misuse. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 72-82.
(1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89-99.
