Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

In vivo evaluation of microcirculation by coherent light scattering

Abstract

THE microcirculation plays a central role in the regulation of the metabolic, haemodynamic and thermal state of the individual. Its physiological state varies over both long and short time periods and reflects the state of health of the individual; in particular it is the ultimatearbiter of the adequacy of tissue perfusion in the presence of vascular disease or injury. For these reasons it is of interest to both the physiologist and the clinician to be able to monitor the state of flow and distribution of flow in the compartments of the microvasculature rapidly, conveniently and with minimal interference with the many local and central reflex controls. At present such measurements depend on direct observation, plethysmography thermal or radioisotope techniques1, which are slow or cumbersome or grossly disturb the normal state of the subject. We report here the first stages in development of a noninvasive method for acquiring such information which has a rapid response and the potential ability to distinguish flow in the different microvascular compartments by the differences in flow velocities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dahn, I., and Lasser, N. A., Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest., 19 (Suppl. 99), 1–248 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cummins, H. Z., Kable, N., and Yeh, Y., Phys. Rev. Lett., 12, 150 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubin, S. B., Lunacek, J. H., and Benedek, G. B., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 57, 1164–1171 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nossal, R., and Chen, S. H., Nature new Biol., 244, 253–254 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaefer, B. W., Banks, G., and Albert, S. S., Nature, 248, 162–164 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka, T., Riva, C., Ben-Sira, I., and Benedek, G. B., Assoc. Res. Vis. Opth. Abstr. April 24, 8 (1974).

  7. Berge, P., Volachine, B., Billard, R., and Hamelin, A., C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, 265, 889–892 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

STERN, M. In vivo evaluation of microcirculation by coherent light scattering. Nature 254, 56–58 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/254056a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/254056a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing