Abstract
Apostatic selection, in which predators overlook rare prey types while consuming an excess of abundant ones, has been assumed to contribute to the maintenance of prey polymorphisms1,2,3. Such an effect requires predators to respond to changes in the relative abundance of prey, switching to alternatives when a focal prey type becomes less common4,5. Apostatic selection has often been investigated using fixed relative proportions of prey1,6, but its effects on predator–prey dynamics have been difficult to demonstrate7. Here we report results from a new technique that incorporates computer-generated displays8,9 into an established experimental system, that of blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) hunting for cryptic Catocala moths10. Digital prey images from a virtual population are presented to predators. The relative numbers that escape detection determine the subsequent abundance of each prey type. If apostatic selection does promote stability, the system should converge on an eqlibrium in which each prey type appears at a characteristic abundance. Our results show that the detection of cryptic prey does involve apostatic selection, and that such selection can function to maintain prey polymorphism.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, J. A. Frequency-dependent selection by predators. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 319, 485–503 (1988).
Clarke, B. C. in Taxonomy and Geography (ed. Nichols, D.) 47–70 (Systematics Association, Oxford, 1962).
Clarke, B. C. The evidence for apostatic selection. Heredity 24, 347–352 (1969).
Murdoch, W. W. Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol. Monogr. 39, 335–354 (1969).
Murdoch, W. W. & Oaten, A. Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9, 1–131 (1974).
Cooper, J. M. Apostatic selection on prey that match the background. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 23, 221–228 (1984).
Cooper, J. M. & Allen, J. A. Selection by wild birds on artificial dimorphic prey on varied backgrounds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 51, 433–446 (1994).
Glanville, P. W. & Allen, J. A. Protective polymorphism in populations of computer-simulated moth-like prey. Oikos 80, 565–571 (1997).
Plaisted, K. C. & Mackintosh, N. J. Visual search for cryptic stimuli in pigeons: implications for the search image and search rate hypotheses. Anim. Behav. 50, 1219–1232 (1995).
Pietrewicz, A. T. & Kamil, A. C. Search image formation in the blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata). Science 204, 1332–1333 (1979).
Sargent, T. D. Legion of Night: The Underwing Moths (Univ. Massachusetts Press, Amherst, 1976).
Endler, J. A. Progressive background matching in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22, 187–231 (1984).
Holling, C. S. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 45, 1–60 (1965).
Tinbergen, N. The natural control of insects of pinewoods I. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Arch. Néerland. Zool. 13, 265–343 (1960).
Bond, A. B. Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: the attention threshold hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 9, 292–306 (1983).
Blough, P. M. Selective attention and search images in pigeons. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 17, 292–298 (1991).
Langley, C. M. Search images: selective attention to specific visual features. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 22, 152–163 (1996).
Wallace, B. Basic Population Genetics 229–230 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1981).
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Cheng, J. Endler, A. Joern, S. Shettleworth, A. Zera, W. Wagner, J. Allen and J. Diamond for comments and suggestions. This research was supported by a grant from The National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bond, A., Kamil, A. Apostatic selection by blue jays produces balanced polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature 395, 594–596 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/26961
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/26961
This article is cited by
-
Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Perceptual grouping and detection of trial-unique emergent structures by pigeons
Animal Cognition (2022)
-
No Indication of Background Color Matching in a Population of the Brown-Green Polymorphic Admirable Grasshopper (Syrbula admirabilis)
Journal of Insect Behavior (2022)
-
Background complexity and optimal background matching camouflage
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2021)
-
Opportunistic random searcher versus intentional search image user
Scientific Reports (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.