Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Ultrasonic vocalisations facilitate sexual behaviour of female rats

Abstract

ULTRASONIC vocalisations commonly occur during social interactions among rodents. During mating, adult male and female rats (Rattus norvegicus) emit brief 50–60 kHz ultrasonic calls1; however, the function of these vocalisations is not known. In this study, we demonstrate that these mating calls have a precise function for communication. Specifically, 50-kHz vocalisations elicit sexual activity in female rats. Female rats exhibit a series of solicitation patterns during sexual behaviour, including orientation, darting and ear wiggling. These movements excite the male and enhance the likelihood of mounting, thereby facilitating copulation2–4. (Beach has emphasised the importance of solicitation by the female during mating and has suggested the term ‘proceptivity’ to include the female's behaviour in the initiation and maintenance of copulation.) Although the presence of an intact male is usually a prerequisite for solicitation behaviour, the specific sensory cues which elicit it are not known. Isolated oestrous female rats exposed to ultrasonic vocalisations from a male exhibited a shorter latency to, and higher rate of darting when subsequently placed in a mating situation5. Although the auditory cues primed oestrous females to display increased solicitation behaviour when later confronted with an intact male, there was no indication that these ultrasonic vocalisations had a direct function for communication in the induction of these behaviour patterns. The objective of the present report was to determine if ultrasonic mating calls of rats have a direct function for communication during copulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sales, G. D. Anim. Behav. 20, 88–100 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hlinak, Z. & Madlafousek, J. Physiologica Bohemoslovaca 23, 146–147 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. McClintock, M. K., thesis, Univ. Pennsylvania (1974).

  4. Beach, F. A. Horm. Behav. 7, 105–138 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Geyer, L. A., McIntosh, T. K. & Barfield, R. J. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. (1978).

  6. Bruning, J. L. & Kintz, B. L. Computational Handbook of Statistics (Scott Foresman, Glenview, Illinois, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diakow, C. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 88, 704–712 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kow, L. M. & Pfaff, D. W. Horm. Behav. 6, 259–276 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfaff, D. & Lewis, C. Horm. Behav. 5, 317–335 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pfaff, D., Lewis, C., Diakow, C. & Keiner, M. in Progress in Physiological Psychology 1 (eds Stellar, E. & Sprague, J.) (Academic, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Floody, O. R. & Pfaff, D. W. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 91, 820–830 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beach, F. A., Stern, B., Carmichael, M. & Ranson, E. Behav. Biol. 18, 473–487 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitney, G., Alpern, M., Dizinno, G. & Horowitz, G. Anim. Learning Behav. 2, 13–18 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Geyer, L. A. & Barfield, R. J. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. (1978).

  15. Geyer, L. A., Barfield, R. J. & McIntosh, T. K. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. (1978).

  16. Adler, N. J. Eastern Conference on Reproduction Behavior, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York, 13–16 June, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barfield, R. J. & Geyer, L. A. Science 176, 1349–1350 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Francis, R. L. Nature 265, 236–238 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sales, G. D. J. Zool. 168, 149–164 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lore, R., Flannelly, K. & Farina, P. Aggr. Behav. 2, 175–181 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MCINTOSH, T., BARFIELD, R. & GEYER, L. Ultrasonic vocalisations facilitate sexual behaviour of female rats. Nature 272, 163–164 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/272163a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/272163a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing