Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae

Abstract

The antennae of male silk moths are extremely sensitive to the female sex pheromone such that a male moth can find a female up to 4.5 km away1. This remarkable sensitivity is due to both the morphological and biochemical design of these antennae. Along the branches of the plumose antennae are the sensilla trichodea, each consisting of a hollow cuticular hair containing two unbranched dendrites bathed in a fluid, the receptor lymph2,3. The dendrites and receptor lymph are isolated from the haemolymph by a barrier of epidermal cells which secreted the cuticular hair4–6. Pheromone molecules are thought to diffuse down 100 Å-wide pore tubules through the cuticular wall and across the receptor lymph space to receptors located in the dendritic membrane6,7. To prevent the accumulation of residual stimulant and hence sensory adaptation, the pheromone molecules are subsequently inactivated in an apparent two-step process of rapid ‘early inactivation’ followed by much slower enzymatic degradation8,9. The biochemistry involved in this sequence of events is largely unknown. We report here the identification of three proteins which interact with the pheromone of the wild silk moth Antheraea polyphemus: a pheromone-binding protein and a pheromone-degrading esterase, both uniquely located in the pheromone-sensitive sensilla; and a second esterase common to all cuticular tissues except the sensilla.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rau, P. & Rau, N. Trans. Acad. Sci. St Louis 26, 83–221 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boeckh, J., Kaissling, K. -E. & Schneider, D. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Anat. 78, 559–584 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaissling, K. -E. & Thorson, J. in Receptors for Neurotransmitters, Hormones and Pheromones in Insects (eds Satelle, D. B., Hall, L. M. & Hildebrand, J. G.) 261–282 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steinbrecht, R. A. & Kasang, G. in Int. Symp. Olfaction and Taste Vol. 4 (ed. Schneider, D.) 193–199 (Wiss, Stuttgart, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steinbrecht, R. A. & Muller, B. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat. 117, 570–575 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinbrecht, R. A. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat. 139, 533–565 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Steinbrecht, R. A. Tissue & Cell 12, 73–100 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaissling, K. E. in Biochemistry of Sensory Functions (ed. Jaenicke, L.) 243–273 (Springer, Heidelberg, 1974).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaissling, K. -E. in Int. Symp. Olfaction and Taste Vol. 4 (ed. Schneider, D.) 207–213 (Wiss, Stuttgart, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kochansky, J. et al. J. Insect Physiol. 21, 1977–1983 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weber, K. & Osborn, M. J. biol. Chem. 244, 4406–4412 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies, G. & Stark, G. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 66, 651–656 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kasang, G. in Gustation and Olfaction (eds Ohloff, G. & Thomas, A. F.) 245–250 (Academic, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vogt, R. G. & Riddiford, L. M. in Regulation of Insect Development and Behaviour (eds Sehnal, F., Zabza, A., Menn, J. J. & Cymborowski, B.) 955–967 (Polytechnical University of Wroclaw Press, Wroclaw, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kramer, E. in Int. Symp. Olfaction and Taste Vol. 5 (eds Denton, D. A. & Coghlan, J. P.) 329–335 (Academic, New York, 1975).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy, J. S., Ludlow, A. R. & Sanders, C. J. Nature 288, 475–477 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laemmli, U. K. Nature 227, 680–685 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ames, G. F. -L. J. biol. Chem. 249, 634–644 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaw, C. R. & Prasad, R. Biochem. Genet. 4, 297–320 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chamberlain, J. P. Analyt. Biochem. 98, 132–135 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruchel, R. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 24, 773–791 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogt, R., Riddiford, L. Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae. Nature 293, 161–163 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/293161a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/293161a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing