Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Are cross-regulatory interactions between homoeotic genes functionally significant?

Abstract

THE first instar larva of Drosophila consists of a chain of segments or parasegments1 in which the morphological pattern characteristic of each metaniere is determined by the homoeotic genes2–4, which are active in overlapping domains and are known to interact among themselves5–9. The interactions occur at the level of transcription and allow some homoeotic genes to control the patterns and levels of expression of others. The best known among them are the down-regulation of Antennapedia (Antp) by Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and that of Ubx by abdominal-A (abd-A) and Abdominal-B (Abd-B). It has been proposed7,10,11 that these cross-regulatory interactions play a part in specifying cell pattern, and hence the identity of each metaniere. Here we assess the functional significance of some of these interactions by expressing the Antp, Ubx or both homoeotic genes under the control of the heat-shock promoter12–14. Predictably, we find that homoeotic gene products evade normal regulatory controls and can be maximally expressed in regions where they are normally down-regulated, but, surprisingly, we find that interruption of the normal down-regulation of Antp and Ubx has no phenotypic consequences in the epidermis, where homoeotic phenotypes are normally manifest. Hence our results challenge the view that these, and possibly other cross-regulatory interactions have a role in determining segmentai identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. Martinez–Arias, A. & Lawrence, P. A. Nature 313, 639–642 (1985). 2. Lewis, E. B. Nature 276, 565–570 (1978). 3. SÃ nchez–Herrero, E., Vernos, l., Marco, R. & Morata, G. Nature 313, 108–113 (1985). 4. Wakimoto, B. & Kaufman, T. C. Devi Biol. 81, 51–64 (1981). 5. Struhl, G. Proc. nain. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 7380–7384 (1982). 6. Hafen, E., Levine, M. & Gehring, W. J. Nature 307, 287–289 (1984). 7. Struhl, G. & White, R. A. H. Cell 43, 507–519 (1985). 8. Bienz, M. & Tremml. G. Nature 333, 576–578 (1988). 9. Carroll, S. B., Laymon, R. A., McCutcheon, M. A., Riley, P. D. & Scott, M. P. Cell 47,113–122 (1986). 10. Beachy, P. A., Krasnow, M. A., Gavis, E. R. & Hogness, D. S. Celi 55, 1069–1081 (1988). 11. Peifer, M., Karch, F., Bender, W. Genes Dev. l, 891–898 (1987). 12. Schneuwly, S., Klemenz, R. & Gehring, W. J. Nature 325, 816–828 (1987). 13. Gibson, G. & Gehring, W. J. Development 102, 657–675 (1988). 14. Kuziora, M. A. & McGinnis, W. Cell 55, 477–485 (1988). 15. Struhl, G. Nature 308, 36–41 (1981). 16. Struhl, G. J. Embryo!, exp. Morph. 76, 297–331 (1983). 17. Mlodzik, M, Fjose, A. & Gehring, W. J. EMBO J. 2569–2578 (1988). 18. Mahaffey, J. W., Deiderich, R. J. & Kaufman, T. C. Development 105, 167–174 (1989). 19. Chadwick, R. & McGinnis, W. EMBO J. 6, 779–789 (1987). 20. Regulsky, M., McGinnis, N., Chadwick, R. & McGinnis, W. EMBO J. 6, 767–777 (1987). 21. LeMotte, P., Kuriowa, A., Fessier, L. I. & Gehring, W. EMBO J. 8, 219–227 (1989). 22. Krasnow, M. A., Saffman, E. E., Kornfeld, K. & Hogness, D. S. Cell 57, 1031–1043 (1989). 23. Wirz, J., Fessier, L. I. & Gehring, W. J. EMBO J. 5, 3327–3334 (1986). 24. Beachy, P. A., Helfand, S. L. & Hogness, D. S. Nature 313, 545–551 (1985). 25. Gehring, W. J. & Hiromi, Y. A. Rev. Genet. 20, 147–173 (1986). 26. Akam, M. Development 101, 1–22 (1987). 27. Muller, M. et al. EMBO J. 7, 4299–4304 (1988). 28. Struhl, G. Nature 338, 741–744 (1989).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonzalez-Reyes, A., Urquia, N., Gehring, W. et al. Are cross-regulatory interactions between homoeotic genes functionally significant?. Nature 344, 78–80 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/344078a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/344078a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing