Abstract
How reversible is adaptive evolution1,2,3,4,5,6? Studies of microbes give mixed answers to this question6,7,8,9,10,11. Reverse evolution has been little studied in sexual populations12,13,14, even though the population genetics of sexual populations may be quite different. In the present study, 25 diverged replicated populations of Drosophila melanogaster are returned to a common ancestral environment for 50 generations. Here we show that reverse evolution back to the ancestral state occurs, but is not universal, instead depending on previous evolutionary history and the character studied. Hybrid populations showed no greater tendency to undergo successful reverse evolution, suggesting that insufficient genetic variation was not the factor limiting reverse evolution. Adaptive reverse evolution is a contingent process which occurs with only 50 generations of sexual reproduction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Muller, H. J. Reversibility in evolution considered from the standpoint of genetics. Biol. Rev. 14, 261–280 (1939).
Simpson, G. G. The Major Features of Evolution (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1953).
Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol 3 Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1977).
Bull, J. J. & Charnov, E. L. On irreversible evolution. Evolution 39, 1149–1155 (1985).
Gayon, J. Darwinism's Struggle for Survival: Heredity and the Hypothesis of Natural Selection (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge and New York, 1998).
Crill, W. D., Wichman, H. A. & Bull, J. J. Evolutionary reversals during viral adaptation to alternating hosts. Genetics 154, 27–37 (2000).
Lenski, R. E. Experimental studies of pleiotropy and epistasis in Escherichia coli. II. Compensation for maladaptive effects associated with resistance to virus T4. Evolution 42, 433–440 (1988).
Rainey, P. B. & Travisano, M. Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394, 69–72 (1998).
Burch, C. L. & Chao, L. Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus φ6. Genetics 151, 921–927 (1999).
Moore, F. B.-G., Rozen, D. E. & Lenski, R. E. Pervasive compensatory adaptation in Escherichia coli. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 515–522 (2000).
Levin, B. L., Perrot, V. & Walker, N. Compensatory mutations, antibiotic resistance and the population genetics of adaptive evolution in Bacteria. Genetics 154, 985–997 (2000).
Clarke, C. A., Mani, G. S. & Wynne, G. Evolution in reverse: clean air and the peppered moth. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 26, 189–199 (1985).
Service, P. M., Hutchison, E. W. & Rose, M. R. Multiple genetic mechanisms for the evolution of senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 42, 708–716 (1988).
Cook, L. M., Dennis, R. L. & Mani, G. S. Melanic morph frequency in the peppered moth in the Manchester area. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 293–297 (1999).
Rose, M. R. Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38, 1004–1010 (1984).
Graves, J. L., Toolson, E. C., Jeong, C., Vu, L. N. & Rose, M. R. Desiccation, flight, glycogen, and postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol. Zool. 65, 268–286 (1992).
Rose, M. R., Vu, L. N., Park, S. U. & Graves, J. L. Selection on stress resistance increased longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Exp. Gerontol. 27, 241–250 (1992).
Fleming, J. E., Spicer, G. S., Garrison, R. C. & Rose, M. R. Two-dimensional protein electrophoretic analysis of postponed aging in Drosophila. Genetica 91, 183–198 (1993).
Tyler, R. H. et al. The effect of superoxide dismutase alleles on aging in Drosophila. Genetica 91, 143–149 (1993).
Leroi, A. M., Chippindale, A. K. & Rose, M. R. Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic life-history trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. The role of genotype-by-environment interaction. Evolution 48, 1244–1257 (1994).
Chippindale, A. K., Alipaz, J. A., Chen, H.-W. & Rose, M. R. Experimental evolution of accelerated development in Drosophila. 1. Development speed and larval survival. Evolution 51, 1536–1551 (1997).
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Dover, New York, 1958).
Reznick, D. N., Bryga, H. & Endler, J. A. Experimentally induced life-history evolution in a natural population. Nature 346, 357–359 (1990).
Coyne, J. A., Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. Perspective: a critique of Sewall Wright's shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51, 643–671 (1997).
Losos, J. B., Jackman, T. R., Larson, A., de Queiroz, K. & Rodriguez-Schettino, L. Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science 279, 2115–2117 (1998).
Cohan, F. M. & Hoffmann, A. A. Uniform selection as a diversifying force in evolution: evidence from Drosophila. Am. Nat. 134, 613–637 (1989).
Travisano, M., Mongold, J. A., Bennet, A. F. & Lenski, R. E. Experimental tests of the roles of adaptation, chance, and history in evolution. Science 267, 87–90 (1995).
SPSS, I. SigmaPlot 5.0. Programming Guide (SPSS Inc., Chicago, 1998).
Glantz, S. A. & Slinker, B. K. Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance (McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, New York, 1990).
Zar, J. H. Biostatistical Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1996).
Acknowledgements
We thank P. Beldade, A. K. Chippindale, L. D. Mueller, E. Sucena and particularly M. Matos for advice throughout the project and for comments on the manuscript. H.T. was supported by the Gulbenkian Foundation and Program PRAXIS XXI/FCT under the “Programa Gulbenkian de Doutoramento em Biologia e Medicina”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teotónio, H., Rose, M. Variation in the reversibility of evolution. Nature 408, 463–466 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35044070
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35044070
This article is cited by
-
Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations
BMC Genomics (2018)
-
Predictable phenotypic, but not karyotypic, evolution of populations with contrasting initial history
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
Rapid evolution of tolerance to toxic Microcystis in two cladoceran grazers
Scientific Reports (2016)
-
Genome-wide analysis of long-term evolutionary domestication in Drosophila melanogaster
Scientific Reports (2016)
-
Elucidating the molecular architecture of adaptation via evolve and resequence experiments
Nature Reviews Genetics (2015)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.