Abstract
If protein evolution is due in large part to slightly deleterious amino acid substitutions1,2, then the rate of evolution should be greater in proteins that contribute less to individual fitness. The rationale for this prediction is that relatively dispensable proteins should be subject to weaker purifying selection, and should therefore accumulate mildly deleterious substitutions more rapidly. Although this argument was presented3 over twenty years ago, and is fundamental to many applications of evolutionary theory4, the prediction has proved difficult to confirm. In fact, a recent study showed that essential mouse genes do not evolve more slowly than non-essential ones5. Thus, although a variety of factors influencing the rate of protein evolution have been supported by extensive sequence analysis6,7,8,9,10,11,12, the relationship between protein dispensability and evolutionary rate has remained unconfirmed. Here we use the results from a highly parallel growth assay of single gene deletions in yeast13 to assess protein dispensability, which we relate to evolutionary rate estimates that are based on comparisons of sequences drawn from twenty-one fully annotated genomes. Our analysis reveals a highly significant relationship between protein dispensability and evolutionary rate, and explains why this relationship is not detectable by categorical comparison of essential versus non-essential proteins. The relationship is highly conserved, so that protein dispensability in yeast is also predictive of evolutionary rate in a nematode worm.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ohta, T. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 263–286 (1992).
Ohta, T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246, 96–98 (1973).
Wilson, A. C., Carlson, S. S. & White, T. J. Biochemical evolution. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 46, 573–639 (1977).
Wagner, A. Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast. Nature Genet. 24, 355–361 (2000).
Hurst, L. D. & Smith, N. G. C. Do essential genes evolve slowly? Curr. Biol. 9, 747–750 (1999).
Kuma, K., Iwabe, N. & Miyata, T. Functional constraints against variations on molecules from the tissue level—slowly evolving brain-specific genes demonstrated by protein-kinase and immuno globulin supergene families. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 123–130 (1995).
Williams, E. J. B. & Hurst, L. D. The proteins of linked genes evolve at similar rates. Nature 407, 900–903 (2000).
Hughes, A. L. Rapid evolution of immunoglobulin superfamily C2 domains expressed in immune system cells. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 1–5 (1997).
Stockbauer, K. E. et al. Hypervariability generated by natural selection in an extracellular complement-inhibiting protein of serotype M1 strains of group A Streptococcus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 3128–3133 (1998).
Yamaguchi, Y. & Gojobori, T. Evolutionary mechanisms and population dynamics of the third variable envelope region of HIV within single hosts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1264–1269 (1997).
Makalowski, W. & Boguski, M. S. Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution distances are correlated in mouse and rat genes. J. Mol. Evol. 47, 119–121 (1998).
Tourasse, N. J. & Li, W. H. Selective constraints, amino acid composition, and the rate of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 656–664 (2000).
Winzeler, E. A., Shoemaker, D. D., Astromoff, A. & Liang, H. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285, 901–906 (1999).
Rivera, M. C., Jain, R., Moore, J. E. & Lake, J. A. Genomic evidence for two functionally distinct gene classes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6239–6244 (1998).
Chervitz, S. A. et al. Comparison of the complete protein sets of worm and yeast: orthology and divergence. Science 282, 2022–2028 (1998).
Robinson, M., Gouy, M., Gautier, C. & Mouchiroud, D. Sensitivity of the relative-rate test to taxonomic sampling. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1091–1098 (1998).
Sarich, V. M. & Wilson, A. C. Generation time and genomic evolution in primates. Science 179, 1144–1147 (1973).
Wu, C.-I. & Li, W.-H. Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 1741–1745 (1985).
Ashburner, M. et al. An exploration of the sequence of a 2.9-Mb region of the genome of Drosophila melanogaster: The Adh region. Genetics 153, 179–219 (1999).
Fraser, A. G. et al. Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans chromosome I by systematic RNA interference. Nature 408, 325–330 (2000).
Smith, V., Chou, K. N., Lashkari, D., Botstein, D. & Brown, P. O. Functional analysis of the genes of yeast chromosome V by genetic footprinting. Science 274, 2069–2074 (1996).
Grishin, N. V. Estimation of the number of amino acid substitutions per site when the substitution rate varies among sites. J. Mol. Evol. 41, 675–679 (1995).
Grishin, N. V., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. From complete genomes to measures of substitution rate variability within and between proteins. Genome Res. 10, 991–1000 (2000).
Feng, D. & Doolittle, R. Converting amino acid alignment scores into measures of evolutionary time: A simulation study of various relationships. J. Mol. Evol. 44, 361–370 (1997).
Huynen, M. & Bork, P. Measuring genome evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5849–5856 (1998).
Tatusov, R. L., Galperin, M. Y., Nalale, D. A. & Koonin, E. V. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 33–36 (2000).
Ewens, W. H. Mathematical Population Genetics (eds Krickeberg, K. & Levin, S. A.) (Springer, New York, 1979).
Kimura, M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47, 713–719 (1962).
Zhang, J. & Gu, X. Correlation between the substitution rate and rate variation among sites in protein evolution. Genetics 149, 1615–1625 (1998).
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Petrov and M. Feldman for much guidance and support. M. Cherry and A. Chu provided assistance with genomic and functional genomic data.
Author information
Additional information
Center for Computational Genetics and Biological Modeling, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirsh, A., Fraser, H. Protein dispensability and rate of evolution. Nature 411, 1046–1049 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35082561
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35082561
This article is cited by
-
Characterization and functional analysis of the PtEXLA1 gene from poplar
Plant Biotechnology Reports (2024)
-
Complete genome sequence of the Pogostemon cablin bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum strain SY1
Genes & Genomics (2023)
-
Balanophora genomes display massively convergent evolution with other extreme holoparasites and provide novel insights into parasite–host interactions
Nature Plants (2023)
-
Complete genome sequence of the kiwifruit bacterial canker pathogen Pseudomonas savastanoi strain MHT1
BMC Microbiology (2022)
-
Complete mitogenome of the endangered and endemic Nicobar treeshrew (Tupaia nicobarica) and comparison with other Scandentians
Scientific Reports (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.