Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The advantage of sex in evolving yeast populations

Abstract

Sex is a general feature of the life cycle of eukaryotes. It is not universal, however, as many organisms seem to lack sex entirely1. The widespread occurrence of sex is puzzling, both because meiotic recombination can disrupt co-adapted combinations of genes, and because it halves the potential rate of reproduction in organisms with strongly differentiated male and female gametes2. Most attempts to explain the maintenance of sexuality invoke differences between parents and sexual offspring. These differences may be advantageous in novel or changing environments if new gene combinations are favoured from time to time1. Sex would then serve to concentrate beneficial mutations that have arisen independently into the same line of descent. But in a stable environment sex might serve to concentrate deleterious mutations, so that they will be more effectively purged from the population by selection3. We have studied the effect of sex on mean fitness in experimental populations of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our results show that sex increases mean fitness in an environment to which the populations were well adapted, but not in an environment to which new adaptation occurred, supporting the hypothesis that the advantage of sexuality lay in the removal of deleterious mutations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Growth rates of experimental yeast populations maintained on galactose or on glucose for 400–600 generations.
Figure 2: Inbreeding depression in ancestral genotypes and their sexual and asexual descendants.
Figure 3: Frequency distributions of colony growth rates on galactose for F1 progeny of crosses between genotypes sampled from populations that evolved on galactose, and their ancestors.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell, G. The Masterpiece of Nature (University of California, San Francisco, (1982)).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maynard Smith, J. The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge Univ. Press, (1978)).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kondrashov, A. S. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336, 435–440 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Charlesworth, D., Morgan, T. M. & Charlesworth, B. Mutation accumulation in finite outbreeding and inbreeding populations. Genet. Res. 61, 39–56 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peck, J. R. Aruby in the rubbish: Beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics 137, 597–606 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Malmberg, R. L. The evolution of epistasis and the advantage of recombination in populations of bacteriophage T4. Genetics 86, 607–621 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. McPhee, C. P. & Robertson, A. The effect of suppressing crossing-over on the response to selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 16, 1–16 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Golemis, E. A., Gyuris, J. & Brent, R. in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (eds Ausubel, F. M. etal.) 13.1–13.14.17 (Wiley, Boston, (1994)).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Birdsell, J. & Wills, C. Significant competition advantage conferred by meiosis and syngamy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 908–912 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kunz, B. A. & Haynes, R. H. in The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces Vol. 1(eds Strathern, J., Jones, E. W. & Broach, J.) 371–414 (Cold Spring Harbor, Plainview, (1981)).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mortimer, R. K. & Schild, D. in The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces Vol. 1(eds Strathern, J., Jones, E. W. & Broach, J.) 341–370 (Cold Spring Harbor, Plainview, (1981)).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Menees, T. M. & Sandmeyer, S. B. Transposition of the yeast retroviruslike element Ty3 is dependent on the cell cycle. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8229–8240 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller, H. L. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat. Res. 1, 2–9 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Crow, J. F. in The Evolution of Sex: an Examination of Current Ideas (eds Michod, R. E. & Levin, B. R.) 56–73 (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, (1988)).

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Visser, J. A. G. M., Hoekstra, R. F. & Van Den Ende, H. The effect of sex and deleterious mutations on fitness in Chlamydomonas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 193–200 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bilanchone, V. W. et al. Positive and negative regulatory elements control expression of the yeast retrotransposon Ty3. Genetics 134, 685–670 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Herskowitz, I. & Jensen, R. E. Putting the HO gene to work: practical uses for mating-type switching. Methods Enzymol. 194, 132–146 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Sandmeyer for yeast strains and plasmids; H. Bussey for plasmids and the use of his micromanipulator; H. Reiswig for the use of digitizing equipment; D. Schoen for comments on the manuscript; and A. Kondrashov for helpful criticism. This research was supported by NSERC and FACR grants to G.B., NSERC and FCAR scholarships to C.Z., and grants to R. Lenski.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifford Zeyl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeyl, C., Bell, G. The advantage of sex in evolving yeast populations. Nature 388, 465–468 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/41312

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/41312

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing