Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The TOR signalling pathway controls nuclear localization of nutrient-regulated transcription factors

Abstract

The rapamycin-sensitive TOR signalling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae activates a cell-growth program in response to nutrients such as nitrogen and carbon1,2,3,4. The TOR1 and TOR2 kinases (TOR) control cytoplasmic protein synthesis and degradation through the conserved TAP42 protein5,6,7,8. Upon phosphorylation by TOR, TAP42 binds and possibly inhibits type 2A and type-2A-related phosphatases6,7,8; however, the mechanism by which TOR controls nuclear events such as global repression of starvation-specific transcription is unknown. Here we show that TOR prevents transcription of genes expressed upon nitrogen limitation by promoting the association of the GATA transcription factor GLN3 with the cytoplasmic protein URE2. The binding of GLN3 to URE2 requires TOR-dependent phosphorylation of GLN3. Phosphorylation and cytoplasmic retention of GLN3 are also dependent on the TOR effector TAP42, and are antagonized by the type-2A-related phosphatase SIT4. TOR inhibits expression of carbon-source-regulated genes by stimulating the binding of the transcriptional activators MSN2 and MSN4 to the cytoplasmic 14-3-3 protein BMH2. Thus, the TOR signalling pathway broadly controls nutrient metabolism by sequestering several transcription factors in the cytoplasm.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: TOR inhibits the GATA transcription factors GLN3 and GAT1.
Figure 2: GLN3 localization is controlled by TOR, URE2, TAP42 and SIT4.
Figure 3: GLN3 and URE2 form a phosphorylation-dependent, rapamycin-sensitive complex.
Figure 4: TOR promotes cytoplasmic retention of MSN and the BMH2–MSN interaction.
Figure 5: TOR promotes a cytoplasmic GLN3–URE2 complex via TAP42-mediated inhibition of the phosphatase SIT4, and thereby prevents nuclear accumulation of GLN3, in response to nutrients (nitrogen).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas,G. & Hall,M. N. TOR signalling and control of cell growth. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 782–787 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbet,N. C. et al. TOR controls translation initiation and early G1 progression in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 25–42 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Noda,T. & Ohsumi,Y. Tor, a phosphatidylinositol kinase homologue, controls autophagy in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3963–3966 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck,T., Schmidt,A. & Hall,M. N. Starvation induces vacuolar targeting and degradation of the tryptophan permease in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 146, 1227–1237 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennis,P. B., Fumagalli,S. & Thomas,G. Target of rapamycin (TOR): balancing the opposing forces of protein synthesis and degradation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 49–54 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Como,C. J. & Arndt,K. T. Nutrients, via the Tor proteins, stimulate the association of Tap42 with type 2A phosphatases. Genes Dev. 10, 1904–1916 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt,A., Beck,T., Koller,A., Kunz,J. & Hall,M. N. The TOR nutrient signalling pathway phosphorylates NPR1 and inhibits turnover of the tryptophan permease. EMBO J. 17, 6924–6931 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang,Y. & Broach,J. R. Tor proteins and protein phosphatase 2A reciprocally regulate Tap42 in controlling cell growth in yeast. EMBO J. 18, 2782–2792 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marzluf,G. A. Genetic regulation of nitrogen metabolism in the fungi. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61, 17–32 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Marini,A. M., Soussi-Boudekou,S., Vissers,S. & Andre,B. A family of ammonium transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4282–4293 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Magasanik,B. in The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces (eds Jones, E. W., Pringe, J. R. & Broach, J. R.) 283–317 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blinder,D., Coschigano,P. W. & Magasanik,B. Interaction of the GATA factor Gln3p with the nitrogen regulator Ure2p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 178, 4734–4736 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Coschigano,P. W. & Magasanik,B. The URE2 gene product of Saccharomyces cerevisiae plays an important role in the cellular response to the nitrogen source and has homology to glutathione S-transferases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 822–832 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heitman,J., Movva,N. R. & Hall,M. N. Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science 253, 905–909 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith,A., Ward,M. P. & Garrett,S. Yeast PKA represses Msn2p/Msn4p-dependent gene expression to regulate growth, stress response and glycogen accumulation. EMBO J. 17, 3556–3564 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gorner,W. et al. Nuclear localization of the C2H2 zinc finger protein MsN2p is regulated by stress and protein kinase A activity. Genes Dev. 12, 586–597 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boy-Marcotte,E., Perrot,M., Bussereau,F., Boucherie,H. & Jacquet,M. Msn2p and Msn4p control a large number of genes induced at the diauxic transition which are repressed by cyclic AMP in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 180, 1044–1052 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Brunet,A. et al. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell 96, 857–868 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bertram,P. G., Zeng,C., Thorson,J., Shaw,A. S. & Zheng,X. F. The 14-3-3 proteins positively regulate rapamycin-sensitive signaling. Curr. Biol. 8, 1259–1267 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kops,G. J. et al. Direct control of the Forkhead transcription factor AFX by protein kinase B. Nature 398, 630–634 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hara,K. et al. Amino acid sufficiency and mTOR regulate p70 S6 kinase and eIF-4E BP1 through a common effector mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14484–14494 (1998); erratum, 22160 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wach,A., Brachat,A., Pohlmann,R. & Philippsen,P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10, 1793–1808 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Longtine,M. S. et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 953–961 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherman,F. in Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology (eds Guthrie, C. & Fink, G. R.) 3–21 (Academic, San Diego, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Ausubel,F. M. et al. (eds) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. W. Sturgill and T. Schmelzle for comments on the manuscript, E. Jacinto for unpublished results, and A. Löschmann for technical assistance. The work was supported by grants of the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Canton of Basel (M.N.H.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael N. Hall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beck, T., Hall, M. The TOR signalling pathway controls nuclear localization of nutrient-regulated transcription factors. Nature 402, 689–692 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/45287

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/45287

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing