Abstract
Comparative biology requires a firm phylogenetic foundation to uncover and understand patterns of diversification and evaluate hypotheses of the processes responsible for these patterns. In the angiosperms, studies of diversification in floral form1,2, stamen organization3, reproductive biology4, photosynthetic pathway5, nitrogen-fixing symbioses6 and life histories7 have relied on either explicit or implied phylogenetic trees. Furthermore, to understand the evolution of specific genes and gene families, evaluate the extent of conservation of plant genomes and make proper sense of the huge volume of molecular genetic data available for model organisms8 such as Arabidopsis, Antirrhinum, maize, rice and wheat, a phylogenetic perspective is necessary. Here we report the results of parsimony analyses of DNA sequences of the plastid genes rbcL and atpB and the nuclear 18S rDNA for 560 species of angiosperms and seven non-flowering seed plants and show a well-resolved and well-supported phylogenetic tree for the angiosperms for use in comparative biology.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Endress,P. K. Floral structure and evolution of primitive angiosperms: recent advances. Plant Syst. Evol. 192, 79–97 (1994).
Donoghue,M. J., Ree,R. H. & Baum,D. A. Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends Plant Science 3, 311–317 (1998).
Ronse Decraene,L.-P. & Smets,E. The distribution and systematic relevance of the androecial characters oligomery and polymery in the Magnoliophytina. Nord. J. Bot. 7, 239–253 (1987).
Weller,S. G., Donoghue,M. J. & Charlesworth,D. in Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics (eds Hoch, P. C. & Stephenson, A. G.) 355–382 (Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, 1995).
Kellogg,E. A. in The Biology of C4 Photosynthesis (eds Sage, R. F. & Monson, R. K.) 411–444 (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).
Soltis,D. E. et al. Chloroplast gene sequence data suggest a single origin of the predisposition for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in angiosperms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 2647–2651 (1995).
Dodd,M. E., Silvertown,J. & Chase,M. W. Phylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families. Evolution 53, 732–744 (1999).
Gale,M. D. & Devos,K. M. Plant comparative genetics after 10 years. Science 282, 656–658 (1998).
Chase,M. W. et al. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80, 528–580 (1993).
Doyle,J. A., Donoghue,M. J. & Zimmer,E. A. Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81, 419–450 (1994).
Soltis,D. E. et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 84, 1–49 (1997).
Nandi,W. I., Chase,M. W. & Endress,P. K. A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and non-molecular data sets. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85, 137–212 (1998).
Savolainen,V. et al. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. (in the press).
Qiu,Y.-L. et al. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402, 404–407 (1999).
Felsenstein,J. The number of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 27, 27–33 (1978).
Rice,K. A., Donoghue,M. J. & Olmstead,R. G. Analyzing large data sets: rbcL 500 revisited. Syst. Biol. 46, 554–563 (1997).
Nixon,K. C., Davis,J. L. & Goloboff,P. A. Search strategies for large datasets: an example using rbcL. Am. J. Bot. 85, 148 (1998).
Soltis,D. E. et al. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47, 32–42 (1998).
Chase,M. W. & Cox,A. V. Gene sequences, collaboration and analysis of large data sets. Australian Syst. bot. 11, 215–229 (1998).
Hillis,D. M. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383, 130 (1996).
Graybeal,A. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47, 9–17 (1998).
Mathews,S. & Donoghue,M. J. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286, 947–950 (1999).
Cronquist,A. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants (Columbia University Press, New York, 1981).
Takhtajan,A. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants (Columbia University Press, New York, 1997).
Chase,M. W. et al. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification, in Proceedings of Monocots II: The Second International Symposium on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons, Sydney, Australia, (eds Wilson, K. & Morrison, D.) (CSIRO Press, Sydney, in the press).
Cronquist,A. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants (The New York Botanical Garden, New York, 1988).
Takhtajan,A. Evolutionary Trends in Flowing Plants (Columbia University Press, New York, 1991).
Kramer,E. M., Dorit,R. L. & Irish,V. F. Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics 149, 765–783 (1998).
Swofford,D. L. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony* (PAUP*), version 4.0. (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 1998).
Farris,J. S., Albert,V. A., Källersjö,M., Lipscomb,D. & Kluge,A. G. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12, 99–124 (1996).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the NSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 1070 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soltis, P., Soltis, D. & Chase, M. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402, 402–404 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/46528
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/46528
This article is cited by
-
Unraveling Amazon tree community assembly using Maximum Information Entropy: a quantitative analysis of tropical forest ecology
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Fleshy or dry: transcriptome analyses reveal the genetic mechanisms underlying bract development in Ephedra
EvoDevo (2022)
-
Whole-genome microsynteny-based phylogeny of angiosperms
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Plastid phylogenomic insights into relationships of all flowering plant families
BMC Biology (2021)
-
Assessment of Polygala paniculata (Polygalaceae) characteristics for evolutionary studies of legume–rhizobia symbiosis
Journal of Plant Research (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.