Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Cord Blood Stem Cells

Prospective study of one- vs two-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation following reduced intensity conditioning in adults with hematological malignancies

Abstract

As the threshold nucleated cell dose for one-unit umbilical cord blood (UCB) in adults has not to date been firmly established, we prospectively compared one- vs two-unit UCB transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in adult patients with hematological malignancies. Study design specified one-UCB unit if the cryopreserved total nucleated cell (TNC) dose was 2.5 × 107/kg recipient weight, otherwise two units matched at minima of 4/6 HLA loci to the patient and 3/6 to each other were infused. A total of 27 patients received one unit; 23 patients received two units. Median time to ANC >500/μL was 24 days (95% confidence interval 22–28 days), 25 days for one unit and 23 days for two units (P=0.99). At day 100, ANC >500/μL was 88.4 and 91.3% in the one- and two-unit groups (P=0.99), respectively. Three-year EFS was 28.6% and 39.1% in the one- and two-unit groups (P=0.71), respectively. Infusion of two units was associated with a significantly lower relapse risk, 30.4% vs 59.3% (P=0.045). Infused cell doses (TNC, CD3+, CD34+ and CD56+CD3neg) did not impact on engraftment, OS or EFS. Taken together, one-unit UCB transplantation with a threshold cell dose 2.5 × 107/kg recipient weight after RIC is a viable option for adults, although infusion of two units confers a lower relapse incidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chao NJ, Koh LP, Long GD, Gasparetto C, Horwitz M, Morris A et al. Adult recipients of umbilical cord blood transplants after nonmyeloablative preparative regimens. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2004; 10: 569–575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Komatsu T, Narimatsu H, Yoshimi A, Kurita N, Kusakabe M, Hori A et al. Successful engraftment of mismatched unrelated cord blood transplantation following reduced intensity preparative regimen using fludarabine and busulfan. Ann Hematol 2007; 86: 49–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Narimatsu H, Watanabe M, Kohno A, Sugimoto K, Kuwatsuka Y, Uchida T et al. High incidence of graft failure in unrelated cord blood transplantation using a reduced-intensity preparative regimen consisting of fludarabine and melphalan. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008; 41: 753–756.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Uchida N, Wake A, Takagi S, Yamamoto H, Kato D, Matsuhashi Y et al. Umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning for elderly patients with hematologic diseases. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14: 583–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanda J, Rizzieri DA, Gasparetto C, Long GD, Chute JP, Sullivan KM et al. Adult dual umbilical cord blood transplantation using myeloablative total body irradiation (1350 cGy) and fludarabine conditioning. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 867–874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor TE, Blazar BR, McGlave PB, Miller JS et al. Transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched umbilical cord blood units to enhance engraftment in adults with hematologic malignancy. Blood 2005; 105: 1343–1347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lekakis L, Giralt S, Couriel D, Shpall EJ, Hosing C, Khouri IF et al. Phase II study of unrelated cord blood transplantation for adults with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38: 421–426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunstein CG, Fuchs EJ, Carter SL, Karanes C, Costa LJ, Wu J et al. Alternative donor transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning: results of parallel phase 2 trials using partially HLA-mismatched related bone marrow or unrelated double umbilical cord blood grafts. Blood 2011; 118: 282–288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballen KK, Spitzer TR, Yeap BY, McAfee S, Dey BR, Attar E et al. Double unrelated reduced-intensity umbilical cord blood transplantation in adults. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 82–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brunstein CG, Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor TE, Miller JS, Blazar BR et al. Umbilical cord blood transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning: impact on transplantation outcomes in 110 adults with hematologic disease. Blood 2007; 110: 3064–3070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. MacMillan ML, Weisdorf DJ, Brunstein CG, Cao Q, DeFor TE, Verneris MR et al. Acute graft-versus-host disease after unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation: analysis of risk factors. Blood 2009; 113: 2410–2415.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Majhail NS, Brunstein CG, Shanley R, Sandhu K, McClune B, Oran B et al. Reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with AML/MDS: umbilical cord blood is a feasible option for patients without HLA-matched sibling donors. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 494–498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Avery S, Shi W, Lubin M, Gonzales AM, Heller G, Castro-Malaspina H et al. Influence of infused cell dose and HLA match on engraftment after double-unit cord blood allografts. Blood 2011; 117: 3277–3285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hidalgo A, Weiss LA, Frenette PS . Functional selectin ligands mediating human CD34(+) cell interactions with bone marrow endothelium are enhanced postnatally. J Clin Invest 2002; 110: 559–569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sideri A, Neokleous N, De La Grange PB, Guerton B, Le Bousse Kerdilles MC, Uzan G et al. An overview of the progress on double umbilical cord blood transplantation. Haematologica 2011; 96: 1213–1220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shpall EJ, Bollard CM, Brunstein C . Novel cord blood transplant therapies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17 (1 Suppl): S39–S45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Willemze R, Ruggeri A, Purtill D, Rodrigues CA, Gluckman E, Rocha V . Is there an impact of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors and KIR-ligand incompatibilities on outcomes after unrelated cord blood stem cell transplantation? Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2010; 23: 283–290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Delaney M, Cutler CS, Haspel RL, Yeap BY, McAfee SL, Dey BR et al. High-resolution HLA matching in double-umbilical-cord-blood reduced-intensity transplantation in adults. Transfusion 2009; 49: 995–1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mattsson J, Ringden O, Storb R . Graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14 (1 Suppl): 165–170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Eapen M, Rocha V, Sanz G, Scaradavou A, Zhang MJ, Arcese W et al. Effect of graft source on unrelated donor haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in adults with acute leukaemia: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 653–660.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodrigues CA, Sanz G, Brunstein CG, Sanz J, Wagner JE, Renaud M et al. Analysis of risk factors for outcomes after unrelated cord blood transplantation in adults with lymphoid malignancies: a study by the eurocord-netcord and lymphoma working party of the European Group for blood and marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 256–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ooi J, Takahashi S, Tomonari A, Tsukada N, Konuma T, Kato S et al. Unrelated cord blood transplantation after myeloablative conditioning in adults with ALL. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 455–459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van Heeckeren WJ, Fanning LR, Meyerson HJ, Fu P, Lazarus HM, Cooper BW et al. Influence of human leucocyte antigen disparity and graft lymphocytes on allogeneic engraftment and survival after umbilical cord blood transplant in adults. Br J Haematol 2007; 139: 464–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, Arcese W, Schwerdtfeger R, Bosi A et al. Transplants of umbilical-cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2276–2285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Verneris MR, Brunstein CG, Barker J, MacMillan ML, DeFor T, McKenna DH et al. Relapse risk after umbilical cord blood transplantation: enhanced graft-versus-leukemia effect in recipients of 2 units. Blood 2009; 114: 4293–4299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Brunstein CG, Gutman JA, Weisdorf DJ, Woolfrey AE, Defor TE, Gooley TA et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancy: relative risks and benefits of double umbilical cord blood. Blood 2010; 116: 4693–4699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rubinstein P, Rosenfield RE, Adamson JW, Stevens CE . Stored placental blood for unrelated bone marrow reconstitution. Blood 1993; 81: 1679–1690.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pepe MS, Mori M . Kaplan-Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data? Stat Med 1993; 12: 737–751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brown L, DaGupta A . Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci 2001; 16: 101–133.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sauter C, Abboud M, Jia X, Heller G, Gonzales AM, Lubin M et al. Serious infection risk and immune recovery after double-unit cord blood transplantation without antithymocyte globulin. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011 Epub 2011/02/12.

  31. Oran B, Wagner JE, Defor TE, Weisdorf DJ, Brunstein CG . Effect of Conditioning Regimen Intensity on Acute Myeloid Leukemia Outcomes after Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 1327–1334.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Robin M, Sanz GF, Ionescu I, Rio B, Sirvent A, Renaud M et al. Unrelated cord blood transplantation in adults with myelodysplasia or secondary acute myeloblastic leukemia: a survey on behalf of Eurocord and CLWP of EBMT. Leukemia 2011; 25: 75–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baron F, Storb R, Storer BE, Maris MB, Niederwieser D, Shizuru JA et al. Factors associated with outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative conditioning after failed myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4150–4157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mielcarek M, Storer BE, Sandmaier BM, Sorror ML, Maloney DG, Petersdorf E et al. Comparable outcomes after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation with unrelated and related donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 1499–1507.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Giralt S, Logan B, Rizzo D, Zhang MJ, Ballen K, Emmanouilides C et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning for unrelated donor progenitor cell transplantation: long-term follow-up of the first 285 reported to the national marrow donor program. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 844–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rocha V, Gluckman E . Improving outcomes of cord blood transplantation: HLA matching, cell dose and other graft- and transplantation-related factors. Br J Haematol 2009; 147: 262–274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Wagner JE, Zhang MJ, Champlin RE et al. Outcomes after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2265–2275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Takahashi S, Ooi J, Tomonari A, Konuma T, Tsukada N, Oiwa-Monna M et al. Comparative single-institute analysis of cord blood transplantation from unrelated donors with bone marrow or peripheral blood stem-cell transplants from related donors in adult patients with hematologic malignancies after myeloablative conditioning regimen. Blood 2007; 109: 1322–1330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rocha V, Broxmeyer HE . New approaches for improving engraftment after cord blood transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16 (1 Suppl): S126–S132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cohen YC, Scaradavou A, Stevens CE, Rubinstein P, Gluckman E, Rocha V et al. Factors affecting mortality following myeloablative cord blood transplantation in adults: a pooled analysis of three international registries. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 70–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wagner JE, Barker JN, DeFor TE, Baker KS, Blazar BR, Eide C et al. Transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood in 102 patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases: influence of CD34 cell dose and HLA disparity on treatment-related mortality and survival. Blood 2002; 100: 1611–1618.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Terakura S, Azuma E, Murata M, Kumamoto T, Hirayama M, Atsuta Y et al. Hematopoietic engraftment in recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood is affected by the CD34+ and CD8+ cell doses. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 822–830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fanning LR, Hegerfeldt Y, Tary-Lehmann M, Lesniewski M, Maciejewski J, Weitzel RP et al. Allogeneic transplantation of multiple umbilical cord blood units in adults: role of pretransplant-mixed lymphocyte reaction to predict host-vs-graft rejection. Leukemia 2008; 22: 1786–1790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gutman JA, Turtle CJ, Manley TJ, Heimfeld S, Bernstein ID, Riddell SR et al. Single-unit dominance after double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation coincides with a specific CD8+ T-cell response against the nonengrafted unit. Blood 2010; 115: 757–765.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Narimatsu H, Miyakoshi S, Yamaguchi T, Kami M, Matsumura T, Yuji K et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease following umbilical cord blood transplantation: retrospective survey involving 1072 patients in Japan. Blood 2008; 112: 2579–2582.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We like to thank all members of the Seidman Cancer Center for their excellence in patient care. This work was supported by: RO1-AI47289–01 (MJL), the Stem Cell Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center 5P30CA043703 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00003335), the Abraham J and Phyllis Katz Foundation (MJL), and the Dr Donald and Ruth Weber Goodman Philanthropic Fund (MJL).

Author contributions: Research design: MJL. Patient care: TK-K, YH, WvH, HML, BWC, SLG, PB, WWT, RJC, MJL. Laboratory analysis: HJM, CC, LRF, MJL. Data collection: TK-K, YH, CC, LRF, MJL. Statistical analysis: SM, PF. Manuscript preparation: TK-K, YH, MJL, LRF, HML. Manuscript review: All authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M J Laughlin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kindwall-Keller, T., Hegerfeldt, Y., Meyerson, H. et al. Prospective study of one- vs two-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation following reduced intensity conditioning in adults with hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 47, 924–933 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.195

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2011.195

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links