Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Associations of desire for change in sexual life amongst female medical students in North America

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 25, pages 74–79 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

We analyzed associations of dissatisfaction with sexual life and desire for change in female medical students. Students enrolled in medical schools in North America between February and July 2008 were invited to participate in an internet-based survey of sexual function. The principle outcome measure was a single item question on sexual life satisfaction and desire for change. Women who reported dissatisfaction and desire for change were classified as ‘sexually bothered’. The survey also assessed ethnodemographic factors, student status, sexual history and depressive symptoms. Respondents completed the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Index of Sexual Life. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance and multivariable logistic regression were utilized to analyze responses. There were 661 non-virgin female subjects with data adequate for analysis. Whereas 281 (43%) of these met criteria for high risk of female sexual dysfunction (HRFSD) based on FSFI scoring, just 173 (26%) reported sexual bother. Among women with HRFSD, 126 (45%) reported sexual bother; in women without HRFSD, 362 (95%) were not sexually bothered. Interference in sexual life from tiredness and stress were associated with sexual bother. Progressively better scores on the FSFI desire, orgasm and satisfaction domains were significantly associated with lower odds of sexual bother. Few women in this cohort with FSFI score >26.55 reported sexual bother. Women with FSFI <26.55 had greater odds of sexual bother but this criterion alone was not pathognomonic for sexual concerns. Issues of sexual desire and orgasm appear to have a more important role than lubrication, arousal and sexual pain issues in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB . Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 970–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Witting K, Santtila P, Varjonen M, Jern P, Johansson A, von der Pahlen B et al. Female sexual dysfunction, sexual distress, and compatibility with partner. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 2587–2599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th edn Text Revised Washington, D.C., 2000.

  4. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, Burnett A, Heiman J . The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther 2002; 28: 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chevret M, Jaudinot E, Sullivan K, Marrel A, De Gendre AS . Quality of sexual life and satisfaction in female partners of men with ED: psychometric validation of the Index of Sexual Life (ISL) questionnaire. J Sex Marital Ther 2004; 30: 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ter Kuile MM, Brauer M, Laan E . The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): psychometric properties within a Dutch population. J Sex Marital Ther 2006; 32: 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lief H (ed.) Sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of medical students: implications for medical practice. Harper and Row: Hagerstown, MD, USA, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shindel AW, Ferguson GG, Nelson CJ, Brandes SB . The sexual lives of medical students: a single institution survey. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 796–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shindel AW, Ando KA, Nelson CJ, Breyer BN, Lue TF, Smith JF . Medical student sexuality: how sexual experience and sexuality training impact US and Canadian medical students’ comfort in dealing with patients’ sexuality in clinical practice. Acad Med 2010; 85: 1321–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Breyer BN, Smith JF, Eisenberg ML, Ando KA, Rowen TS, Shindel AW . The impact of sexual orientation on sexuality and sexual practices in North American medical students. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 2391–2400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papaharitou S, Nakopoulou E, Moraitou M, Tsimtsiou Z, Konstantinidou E, Hatzichristou D . Exploring sexual attitudes of students in health professions. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 1308–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark VA, Aneshensel CS, Frerichs RR, Morgan TM . Analysis of effects of sex and age in response to items on the CES-D scale. Psychiatry Res 1981; 5: 171–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R . The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 2005; 31: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tracy JK, Junginger J . Correlates of lesbian sexual functioning. J Womens Health 2007; 16: 499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Norman GR, Sridhar FG, Guyatt GH, Walter SD . Relation of distribution- and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 2001; 39: 1039–1047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bancroft J, Loftus J, Long JS . Distress about sex: a national survey of women in heterosexual relationships. Arch Sex Behav 2003; 32: 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosen RC, Shifren JL, Monz BU, Odom DM, Russo PA, Johannes CB . Correlates of sexually related personal distress in women with low sexual desire. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 1549–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC . Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281: 537–544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayes RD, Dennerstein L, Bennett CM, Sidat M, Gurrin LC, Fairley CK . Risk factors for female sexual dysfunction in the general population: exploring factors associated with low sexual function and sexual distress. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 1681–1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Evangelia N, Kirana PS, Chiu G, Link C, Rosen R, Hatzichristou D . Level of bother and treatment-seeking predictors among male and female in-patients with sexual problems: a hospital-based study. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 700–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Laumann EO, Glasser DB, Neves RC, Moreira ED . A population-based survey of sexual activity, sexual problems and associated help-seeking behavior patterns in mature adults in the United States of America. Int J Impot Res 2009; 21: 171–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nusbaum MM, Braxton L, Strayhorn G . The sexual concerns of african american, asian american, and white women seeking routine gynecological care. J Am Board Fam Pract 2005; 18: 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fredriksen-Goldsen KI, Kim HJ, Barkan SE, Balsam KF, Mincer SL . Disparities in health-related quality of life: a comparison of lesbians and bisexual women. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: 2255–2261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA

    A W Shindel

  2. Department of Urology University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    B N Breyer & J F Smith

  3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    J F Smith

Authors
  1. A W Shindel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B N Breyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J F Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A W Shindel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

AWS has served on the speaker’s bureau for Endo Pharmaceutical, is section editor for the Yearbook of Urology, and has served as consultant for American Medical Systems, GroupH Inc. and Cerner Inc. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shindel, A., Breyer, B. & Smith, J. Associations of desire for change in sexual life amongst female medical students in North America. Int J Impot Res 25, 74–79 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2012.34

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2012.34

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links