Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Pediatric Highlight
  • Published:

Genetic and environmental contributions to body mass index: comparative analysis of monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins and same-age unrelated siblings

International Journal of Obesity volume 33, pages 37–41 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Background:

Earlier studies have established that a substantial percentage of variance in obesity-related phenotypes is explained by genetic components. However, only one study has used both virtual twins (VTs) and biological twins and was able to simultaneously estimate additive genetic, non-additive genetic, shared environmental and unshared environmental components in body mass index (BMI). Our current goal was to re-estimate four components of variance in BMI, applying a more rigorous model to biological and virtual multiples with additional data. Virtual multiples share the same family environment, offering unique opportunities to estimate common environmental influence on phenotypes that cannot be separated from the non-additive genetic component using only biological multiples.

Methods:

Data included 929 individuals from 164 monozygotic twin pairs, 156 dizygotic twin pairs, five triplet sets, one quadruplet set, 128 VT pairs, two virtual triplet sets and two virtual quadruplet sets. Virtual multiples consist of one biological child (or twins or triplets) plus one same-aged adoptee who are all raised together since infancy. We estimated the additive genetic, non-additive genetic, shared environmental and unshared random components in BMI using a linear mixed model. The analysis was adjusted for age, age2, age3, height, height2, height3, gender and race.

Results:

Both non-additive genetic and common environmental contributions were significant in our model (P-values<0.0001). No significant additive genetic contribution was found. In all, 63.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51.8–75.3%) of the total variance of BMI was explained by a non-additive genetic component, 25.7% (95% CI 13.8–37.5%) by a common environmental component and the remaining 10.7% by an unshared component.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that genetic components play an essential role in BMI and that common environmental factors such as diet or exercise also affect BMI. This conclusion is consistent with our earlier study using a smaller sample and shows the utility of virtual multiples for separating non-additive genetic variance from common environmental variance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Comuzzie AG, Allison DB . The search for human obesity genes. Science 1998; 280: 1374–1377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Segal NL, Allison DB . Twins and virtual twins: bases of relative body weight revisited. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 437–441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Segal NL, Hershberger SL . Virtual twins and intelligence: updated and new analyses of within-family environmental influences. Pers Individ Dif 2005; 39: 1061–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Segal NL, McGuire SA, Havlena J, Gill P, Hershberger SL . Intellectual similarity of virtual twin pairs: developmental trends. Pers Individ Dif 2007; 42: 1209–1219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Segal NL, McGuire SA, Miller S, Havlena J . Tacit coordination in monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins and virtual twins: effects and implications of genetic relatedness. Pers Individ Dif 2008; 45: 607–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vignal J, Daures JP, Vergnes C, Giacalone PL, Boulot P . Assessment of triplet fetal growth by using cross-sectional analysis of the birth weight. Fetal Diagn Ther 1999; 14: 31–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Segal NL . Monozygotic and dizygotic twins: a comparative analysis of mental ability profiles. Child Dev 1985; 56: 1051–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Segal NL . Co-conspirators and double-dealers: a twin film analysis. Pers Individ Dif 2002; 33: 621–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Segal NL, Russell J . IQ similarity in monozygotic and dizygotic twin children: effects of the same versus different examiners: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1991; 32: 703–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McGuire S, Segal NL, Clifford J, Richmond T . Different-sex fraternal twins: Did we forget them? 2000. Paper presented at the Eighth Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Adolescence: Chicago, IL.

  11. Segal NL . Entwined Lives: Twins and What They Tell Us About Human Behavior. Plume: New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Segal NL . Fullerton virtual twin study. Twin Res Hum Genet 2006; 9: 963–964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Segal NL . Indivisible by Two: Lives of Extraordinary Twins. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nichols RC, Bilbro WC . The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica et Statistica Medica 1966; 16: 265–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC . Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Prentice Hall: Harlow, England; New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schabenberger O, Pierce FJ . Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McGue M, Bouchard Jr TJ . Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behav Genet 1984; 14: 325–343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cherny SS, DeFries JC, Fulker DW . Multiple regression analysis of twin data: a model-fitting approach. Behav Genet 1992; 22: 489–497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neale MC, Cardon LR . Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson RJ, Spencer HG . Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance. Genetics 1999; 153: 1949–1958.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sapienza C . Genome imprinting and dominance modification. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1989; 564: 24–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brooks AA, Johnson MR, Steer PJ, Pawson ME, Abdalla HI . Birth weight: nature or nurture? Early Hum Dev 1995; 42: 29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Giussani DA, Forhead AJ, Gardner DS, Fletcher AJ, Allen WR, Fowden AL . Postnatal cardiovascular function after manipulation of fetal growth by embryo transfer in the horse. J Physiol 2003; 547: 67–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MA, Morley KI, Zhu G, Cornes BK et al. Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genet 2006; 2: e41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported, in part by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH63351), the National Science Foundation (SBR-9712875) and California State University Fullerton (Faculty Research Award to Dr Segal).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA

    N L Segal & S Miller

  2. Department of Biostatistics, Section on Statistical Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

    R Feng & D B Allison

  3. Department of Psychology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    S A McGuire

Authors
  1. N L Segal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S A McGuire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D B Allison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N L Segal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segal, N., Feng, R., McGuire, S. et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to body mass index: comparative analysis of monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins and same-age unrelated siblings. Int J Obes 33, 37–41 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.228

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.228

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links