Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Families' views upon experiencing change in the neonatal intensive care unit environment: from the ‘baby barn’ to the private room

Journal of Perinatology volume 28, pages 827–829 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Background:

Parents whose newborns were cared for in the old neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environment and then moved to the new NICU environment describe their impressions of the impact upon their infant's care, information access and support, of the two care settings.

Objectives:

To determine the perceptions of parents in the NICU regarding noise, light, space, access to caregivers and personal privacy as they experience both old and new NICU environments in the continuum of care for their infant.

Methods:

In the first 9 months after moving into the new private room NICU, a convenience sampling of parents was voluntarily administered a 20-question Likert scale survey addressing length of stay (LOS) in the respective NICU environment, environmental stimuli, access to caregivers, access to information and personal privacy. Scores reflect frequency of perceptions as never=1, sometimes=2, usually=3 and always=4.

Results:

The responses of 53 parents are reported. This represents 10% of admissions to the private room NICU during the 9-month sampling time. Fifty-nine percent had LOS of ⩽14 days in the old NICU before moving; 76% had LOS ⩽14 days in the new NICU before completing this survey. Median scores for the major content themes are reported (New:Old). Responses suggest that in the new vs old design, parents feel they are able to spend more time with their infant (4:3); have more privacy (4:2) and space for their personal items (4:1); experience less overstimulation with noise and light (1:2); had comparable access to their infant's nurse (4:4) but greater access to their infant's doctor (3:2); and felt comparably informed (4:4) but better supported by the entire team (4:3).

Conclusions:

The new private room NICU is perceived by parents to offer an enhanced environment that is more spacious and less overstimulating for their infant and themselves. Access to professional caregivers, information and overall support appears to be improved in the new environment despite a larger overall NICU area, floor plan and structural layout.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. White RD . Individual rooms in the NICU—an evolving concept. J Perinatol 2003; 23 (Suppl 1): S22–S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown P, Taquino LT . Designing and delivering neonatal care in single rooms. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2001; 15 (1): 68–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Floyd AM . Challenging designs of neonatal intensive care units. Crit Care Nurse 2005; 25 (5): 59–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walsh WF, McCullough KL, White RD . Room for improvement: nurses' perceptions of providing care in a single room newborn intensive care setting. Adv Neonatal Care 2006; 6 (5): 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson B, Walsh S, Wergin T, Schwarzkopf K, Ecklund S . Challenges in design and transition to a private room model in the neonatal intensive care unit. Adv Neonatal Care 2006; 6 (5): 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Committee on Hospital Care, American Academy of Pediatrics, and Institute for Family-Centered Care. Family-centered care and the pediatrician's role. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 691–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Christopher A . A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press: USA, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown W, Pearl LF, Carrasco N . Evolving models of family-centered services in neonatal intensive care. Child Health Care 1991; 20 (1): 50–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. S Bennett: Parents Reaching Out Coordinator, Monroe Carrell, Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

    B S Carter

  2. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

    A Carter & S Bennett

Authors
  1. B S Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B S Carter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, B., Carter, A. & Bennett, S. Families' views upon experiencing change in the neonatal intensive care unit environment: from the ‘baby barn’ to the private room. J Perinatol 28, 827–829 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.102

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.102

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links