Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A regulatory mutation in IGF2 causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pig

Abstract

Most traits and disorders have a multifactorial background indicating that they are controlled by environmental factors as well as an unknown number of quantitative trait loci (QTLs)1,2. The identification of mutations underlying QTLs is a challenge because each locus explains only a fraction of the phenotypic variation3,4. A paternally expressed QTL affecting muscle growth, fat deposition and size of the heart in pigs maps to the IGF2 (insulin-like growth factor 2) region5,6. Here we show that this QTL is caused by a nucleotide substitution in intron 3 of IGF2. The mutation occurs in an evolutionarily conserved CpG island that is hypomethylated in skeletal muscle. The mutation abrogates in vitro interaction with a nuclear factor, probably a repressor, and pigs inheriting the mutation from their sire have a threefold increase in IGF2 messenger RNA expression in postnatal muscle. Our study establishes a causal relationship between a single-base-pair substitution in a non-coding region and a QTL effect. The result supports the long-held view that regulatory mutations are important for controlling phenotypic variation7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Polymorphisms in a 28.6-kb segment containing TH (exon 14), INS and IGF2 among 15 pig chromosomes with deduced QTL status.
Figure 2: Methylation status, EMSA and transfection assays assessing the significance of the IGF2 mutation.
Figure 3: Analysis of IGF2 mRNA expression.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mackay, T. F. C. Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 11–21 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, L. Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 130–138 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glazier, A. M., Nadeau, J. H. & Aitman, T. J. Finding genes that underlie complex traits. Science 298, 2345–2349 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Darvasi, A. & Pisante-Shalom, A. Complexities in the genetic dissection of quantitative trait loci. Trends Genet. 18, 489–491 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeon, J.-T. et al. A paternally expressed QTL affecting skeletal and cardiac muscle mass in pigs maps to the IGF2 locus. Nature Genet. 21, 157–158 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nezer, C. et al. An imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass and fat deposition maps to the IGF2 locus in pigs. Nature Genet. 21, 155–156 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. King, M. C. & Wilson, A. C. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 188, 107–116 (1975)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nezer, C. et al. Haplotype sharing refines the location of an imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass to a 250 Kb chromosome segment containing the porcine IGF2 gene. Genetics 165, 277–285 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Florini, J. R., Ewton, D. Z. & McWade, F. J. IGFs, muscle growth, and myogenesis. Diabetes Rev. 3, 73–92 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, G. J. et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci for production traits in commercial pig populations. Genetics 164, 621–627 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. de Koning, D. J. et al. Genome-wide scan for body composition in pigs reveals important role of imprinting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7947–7950 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Amarger, V. et al. Comparative sequence analysis of the Insulin-IGF2–H19 gene cluster in pigs. Mamm. Genome 13, 388–398 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greally, J. M., Guinness, M. E., McGrath, J. & Zemel, S. Matrix-attachment regions in the mouse chromosome 7F imprinted domain. Mamm. Genome 8, 805–810 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Constancia, M. et al. Deletion of a silencer element in Igf2 results in loss of imprinting independent of H19. Nature Genet. 26, 203–206 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eden, S. et al. An upstream repressor element plays a role in Igf2 imprinting. EMBO J. 20, 3518–3525 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Giuffra, E. et al. The origin of the domestic pig: independent domestication and subsequent introgression. Genetics 154, 1785–1791 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Grobet, L. et al. A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle. Nature Genet. 17, 71–74 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Milan, D. et al. A mutation in PRKAG3 associated with excess glycogen content in pig skeletal muscle. Science 288, 1248–1251 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Galloway, S. M. et al. Mutations in an oocyte-derived growth factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensitive manner. Nature Genet. 25, 279–283 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mulsant, P. et al. Mutation in bone morphogenetic protein receptor-IB is associated with increased ovulation rate in Booroola Merino ewes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5104–5109 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pailhoux, E. et al. A 11.7-kb deletion triggers intersexuality and polledness in goats. Nature Genet. 29, 453–458 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Freking, B. A. et al. Identification of the single base change causing the callipyge muscle hypertrophy phenotype, the only known example of polar overdominance in mammals. Genome Res. 12, 1496–1506 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Grisart, B. et al. Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Res. 12, 222–231 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haley, C. S., Knott, S. A. & Elsen, J. M. Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics 136, 1195–1207 (1994)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson, S. I., Lopez-Corrales, N. L., Gorick, B. & Archibald, A. L. A large fragment porcine genomic library resource in a BAC vector. Mamm. Genome 11, 811–814 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nickerson, D., Tobe, V. O. & Taylor, S. L. PolyPhred: automating the detection and genotyping of single nucleotide substitutions using fluorescent-based resequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 2745–2751 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Engemann, S., El-Maarri, O., Hajkova, P., Oswald, J. & Walter, J. in Methods in Molecular Biology Vol. 181 (ed. Ward, A.) (Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Andrews, N. C. & Faller, D. V. A rapid micropreparation technique for extraction of DNA-binding proteins from limiting numbers of mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2499 (1991)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kashuk, C., Sengupta, S., Eichler, E. & Chakravarti, A. ViewGene: a graphical tool for polymorphism visualization and characterization. Genome Res. 12, 333–338 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Charlier and H. Ronne for discussions, M. Laita, B. McTeir, J. Pettersson, A.-C. Svensson and M. Köping-Höggård for technical assistance, and the Pig Improvement Company for providing DNA samples from Berkshire and Gloucester Old Spot pigs. This work was supported by the Belgian Ministère des Classes Moyennes et de l'Agriculture, the AgriFunGen program at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning, Gentec, the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the UK Pig Breeders Consortium, and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michel Georges or Leif Andersson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Patent applications concerning the commercial application of the IGF2 QTL have been filed by Melica HB, Sweden (represented by Leif Andersson), University of Liege, Belgium (represented by Michel Georges) and Gentec, Belgium (represented by Nadine Buys).

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Laere, AS., Nguyen, M., Braunschweig, M. et al. A regulatory mutation in IGF2 causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pig. Nature 425, 832–836 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02064

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing