Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development

Abstract

Because nucleosomes are widely replaced by protamine in mature human sperm, the epigenetic contributions of sperm chromatin to embryo development have been considered highly limited. Here we show that the retained nucleosomes are significantly enriched at loci of developmental importance, including imprinted gene clusters, microRNA clusters, HOX gene clusters, and the promoters of stand-alone developmental transcription and signalling factors. Notably, histone modifications localize to particular developmental loci. Dimethylated lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4me2) is enriched at certain developmental promoters, whereas large blocks of H3K4me3 localize to a subset of developmental promoters, regions in HOX clusters, certain noncoding RNAs, and generally to paternally expressed imprinted loci, but not paternally repressed loci. Notably, trimethylated H3K27 (H3K27me3) is significantly enriched at developmental promoters that are repressed in early embryos, including many bivalent (H3K4me3/H3K27me3) promoters in embryonic stem cells. Furthermore, developmental promoters are generally DNA hypomethylated in sperm, but acquire methylation during differentiation. Taken together, epigenetic marking in sperm is extensive, and correlated with developmental regulators.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Profiling of nucleosomes and their modifications at HOXD.
Figure 2: Nucleosome enrichment at imprinted gene clusters, with high H3K4me3 at paternally expressed noncoding RNAs, and paternally demethylated regions.
Figure 3: Developmental promoters in sperm lack DNA methylation, but acquire methylation during development.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Ward, W. S. & Coffey, D. S. DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: comparison with somatic cells. Biol. Reprod. 44, 569–574 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wykes, S. M. & Krawetz, S. A. The structural organization of sperm chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 29471–29477 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balhorn, R., Brewer, L. & Corzett, M. DNA condensation by protamine and arginine-rich peptides: analysis of toroid stability using single DNA molecules. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 56, 230–234 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gatewood, J. M., Cook, G. R., Balhorn, R., Schmid, C. W. & Bradbury, E. M. Isolation of four core histones from human sperm chromatin representing a minor subset of somatic histones. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20662–20666 (1990)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kimmins, S. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Chromatin remodelling and epigenetic features of germ cells. Nature 434, 583–589 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nix, D. A., Courdy, S. J. & Boucher, K. M. Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 523 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reik, W., Santos, F. & Dean, W. Mammalian epigenomics: reprogramming the genome for development and therapy. Theriogenology 59, 21–32 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Santos, F., Hendrich, B., Reik, W. & Dean, W. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 241, 172–182 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rangasamy, D., Berven, L., Ridgway, P. & Tremethick, D. J. Pericentric heterochromatin becomes enriched with H2A.Z during early mammalian development. EMBO J. 22, 1599–1607 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–326 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernstein, B. E. et al. Methylation of histone H3 Lys 4 in coding regions of active genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8695–8700 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyer, L. A. et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122, 947–956 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller, J. & Kassis, J. A. Polycomb response elements and targeting of Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila . Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 476–484 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwartz, Y. B. et al. Genome-wide analysis of Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster . Nature Genet. 38, 700–705 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanay, A., O’Donnell, A. H., Damelin, M. & Bestor, T. H. Hyperconserved CpG domains underlie Polycomb-binding sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5521–5526 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cao, R. et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 298, 1039–1043 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, T. I. et al. Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 301–313 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kopp, J. L., Ormsbee, B. D., Desler, M. & Rizzino, A. Small increases in the level of Sox2 trigger the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 26, 903–911 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wernig, M. et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318–324 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohn, F. et al. Lineage-specific polycomb targets and de novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors. Mol. Cell 30, 755–766 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Illingworth, R. et al. A novel CpG island set identifies tissue-specific methylation at developmental gene loci. PLoS Biol. 6, e22 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Down, T. A. et al. A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 779–785 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Farthing, C. R. et al. Global mapping of DNA methylation in mouse promoters reveals epigenetic reprogramming of pluripotency genes. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000116 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Landgraf, P. et al. A mammalian microRNA expression atlas based on small RNA library sequencing. Cell 129, 1401–1414 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Glazov, E. A., McWilliam, S., Barris, W. C. & Dalrymple, B. P. Origin, evolution, and biological role of miRNA cluster in DLK-DIO3 genomic region in placental mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 939–948 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Takada, S. et al. Delta-like and Gtl2 are reciprocally expressed, differentially methylated linked imprinted genes on mouse chromosome 12. Curr. Biol. 10, 1135–1138 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. da Rocha, S. T., Edwards, C. A., Ito, M., Ogata, T. & Ferguson-Smith, A. C. Genomic imprinting at the mammalian Dlk1-Dio3 domain. Trends Genet. 24, 306–316 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, S. S., Liu, Y. H., Tseng, C. N. & Singh, S. Analysis of gene expression in single human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 340, 48–53 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Weber, M. et al. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nature Genet. 39, 457–466 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fouse, S. D. et al. Promoter CpG methylation contributes to ES cell gene regulation in parallel with Oct4/Nanog, PcG complex, and histone H3 K4/K27 trimethylation. Cell Stem Cell 2, 160–169 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vire, E. et al. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature 439, 871–874 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schlesinger, Y. et al. Polycomb-mediated methylation on Lys27 of histone H3 pre-marks genes for de novo methylation in cancer. Nature Genet. 39, 232–236 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ooi, S. K. et al. DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature 448, 714–717 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gordon, M. et al. Genome-wide dynamics of SAPHIRE, an essential complex for gene activation and chromatin boundaries. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 4058–4069 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zalenskaya, I. A., Bradbury, E. M. & Zalensky, A. O. Chromatin structure of telomere domain in human sperm. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 279, 213–218 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bolstad, B. M., Irizarry, R. A., Astrand, M. & Speed, T. P. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185–193 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dudoit, S., Gilbert, H. N. & van der Laan, M. J. Resampling-based empirical Bayes multiple testing procedures for controlling generalized tail probability and expected value error rates: focus on the false discovery rate and simulation study. Biom. J. 50, 716–744 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Dalley for microarray and sequencing expertise, B. Schackmann for oligonucleotides, K. Boucher for statistical analysis, J. Wittmeyer for yeast nucleosomes and helpful comments, and T. Parnell for helpful comments. Financial support was from the Department of Urology (genomics and support of S.S.H.), the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) (genomics, biologicals and support of J.P. and H.Z.), CA24014 and CA16056 for core facilities, and the Huntsman Cancer Institute (bioinformatics and support of D.A.N.). B.R.C. is an investigator with the HHMI.

Author Contributions B.R.C., D.T.C. and S.S.H. were involved in the overall design. D.T.C. and S.S.H. were responsible for acquisition of samples, clinical logistics, patient consenting and Institutional Review Board documents. B.R.C., S.S.H., D.A.N. and H.Z. designed detailed molecular and genomics approaches. D.A.N. carried out data processing and array analysis. S.S.H. and D.A.N. performed sequencing analysis. S.S.H. carried out experiments and produced the figures. J.P. carried out immunoblotting and bisulphite sequencing. B.R.C. wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Douglas T. Carrell or Bradley R. Cairns.

Additional information

The raw unfiltered reads (fastq format) are deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the SuperSeries GSE15594, which encompasses the Subseries entries GSE15690 for ChIP-seq data and GSE15701 for ChIP-chip data.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-12 with Legends. (PDF 1294 kb)

Supplementary Tables

This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-14. (PDF 1358 kb)

Supplementary Data

This file contains gene lists. (XLS 812 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammoud, S., Nix, D., Zhang, H. et al. Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature 460, 473–478 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08162

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08162

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing