Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Marked differences in differentiation propensity among human embryonic stem cell lines

Abstract

The differentiation potential of 17 human embryonic stem (hES) cell lines was compared. Some lines exhibit a marked propensity to differentiate into specific lineages, often with >100-fold differences in lineage-specific gene expression. For example, HUES 8 is best for pancreatic differentiation and HUES 3 for cardiomyocyte generation. These non-trivial differences in developmental potential among hES cell lines point to the importance of screening and deriving lines for lineage-specific differentiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Differences between HUES lines in propensity to differentiate into pancreatic and cardiac lineages.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adewumi, O. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 803–816 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, S.E. et al. Mol. Cells 23, 49–56 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cowan, C.A. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 1353–1356 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, A.G . Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 435–462 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baldwin, H.S. et al. Development 120, 2539–2553 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bilir, B.M. Hepatology 18, 1009–1011 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hermiston, M.L., Xu, Z. & Weiss, A. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 107–137 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cascio, S. & Zaret, K.S . Development 113, 217–225 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanai-Azuma, M. et al. Development 129, 2367–2379 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gu, G., Dubauskaite, J. & Melton, D.A. Development 129, 2447–2457 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loebel, D.A. & Tam, P.P . Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1491–1492 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D'Amour, K.A. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1534–1541 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lyons, I. et al. Genes Dev. 9, 1654–1666 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Westfall, M.V., Samuelson, L.C. & Metzger, J.M. Dev. Dyn. 206, 24–38 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewitzky, M. & Yamanaka, S. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18, 467–473 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Asashima for encouraging this work, K. Rodolfa, A. Kweudjeu and C. Balatbat for excellent technical support, S. Sullivan, D. Huangfu and Q. Zhou for critically reading the manuscript. D.A.M. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.O., L.C., M.B., C.A.C., K.R.C. and D.A.M. designed the experiments. K.O., L.C., M.B., R.J.M. and C.S.F. performed experiments. K.O., L.C., M.B., Y.S., C.A.C., K.R.C. and D.A.M. analyzed the data obtained. K.O. and D.A.M. drafted the manuscript. K.O., L.C., M.B., R.J.M., C.S.F., Y.S., C.A.C., K.R.C. and D.A.M. provided revisions to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas A Melton.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–8, Tables 1–3, Methods (PDF 5075 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osafune, K., Caron, L., Borowiak, M. et al. Marked differences in differentiation propensity among human embryonic stem cell lines. Nat Biotechnol 26, 313–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1383

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1383

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing