Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Common genetic variants account for differences in gene expression among ethnic groups

Abstract

Variation in DNA sequence contributes to individual differences in quantitative traits, but in humans the specific sequence variants are known for very few traits. We characterized variation in gene expression in cells from individuals belonging to three major population groups. This quantitative phenotype differs significantly between European-derived and Asian-derived populations for 1,097 of 4,197 genes tested. For the phenotypes with the strongest evidence of cis determinants, most of the variation is due to allele frequency differences at cis-linked regulators. The results show that specific genetic variation among populations contributes appreciably to differences in gene expression phenotypes. Populations differ in prevalence of many complex genetic diseases, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. As some of these are probably influenced by the level of gene expression, our results suggest that allele frequency differences at regulatory polymorphisms also account for some population differences in prevalence of complex diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Gene expression in CHB+JPT (open circles) and CEU (filled circles) for eight genes that differ in mean expression level between the populations (N = 82 for CHB+JPT, and N = 60 for CEU).
Figure 2: Results of cluster analysis.
Figure 3: The population difference in expression of POMZP3 is accounted for by the allele frequency difference at the very closely linked SNP rs2005354.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Schadt, E.E. et al. Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature 422, 297–302 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheung, V.G. et al. Natural variation in human gene expression assessed in lymphoblastoid cells. Nat. Genet. 33, 422–425 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheung, V.G. et al. Mapping determinants of human gene expression by regional and genome-wide association. Nature 437, 1365–1369 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Morley, M. et al. Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression. Nature 430, 743–747 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Stranger, B.E. et al. Genome-wide associations of gene expression variation in humans. PLoS Genet. 1, e78 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Monks, S.A. et al. Genetic inheritance of gene expression in human cell lines. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75, 1094–1105 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yan, H., Yuan, W., Velculescu, V.E., Vogelstein, B. & Kinzler, K.W. Allelic variation in human gene expression. Science 297, 1143 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pastinen, T. et al. A survey of genetic and epigenetic variation affecting human gene expression. Physiol. Genomics 16, 184–193 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsui, L.C. Mutations and sequence variations detected in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene: a report from the Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium. Hum. Mutat. 1, 197–203 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paw, B.H., Tieu, P.T., Kaback, M.M., Lim, J. & Neufeld, E.F. Frequency of three Hex A mutant alleles among Jewish and non-Jewish carriers identified in a Tay-Sachs screening program. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 47, 698–705 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. The International HapMap Consortium. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437, 1299–1320 (2005).

  12. Westfall, P.H. & Young, S.S. Resampling-Based Multiple Testing (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992).

  13. Wilson, W., III . et al. Characterization of a common deletion polymorphism of the UGT2B17 gene linked to UGT2B15. Genomics 84, 707–714 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCarroll, S.A. et al. Common deletion polymorphisms in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 38, 86–92 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinds, D.A. et al. Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations. Science 307, 1072–1079 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisen, M.B., Spellman, P.T., Brown, P.O. & Botstein, D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14863–14868 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Osada, N., Kohn, M.H. & Wu, C.I. Genomic inferences of the cis-regulatory nucleotide polymorphisms underlying gene expression differences between Drosophila melanogaster mating races. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1585–1591 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McEvoy, B., Beleza, S. & Shriver, M.D. The genetic architecture of normal variation in human pigmentation: An evolutionary perspective and model. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15, R176–R181 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lamason, R.L. et al. SLC24A5, a putative cation exchanger, affects pigmentation in zebrafish and humans. Science 310, 1782–1786 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Knight, J.C. Regulatory polymorphisms underlying complex disease traits. J. Mol. Med. 83, 97–109 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Weber for carrying out the microarray hybridizations, V. Mancuso for processing samples and data analysis and H. H. Kazazian and K. Ewens for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants (to R.S.S, V.G.C) and by the W.W. Smith Chair (V.G.C.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Richard S Spielman or Vivian G Cheung.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Genes whose expression differs significantly between CEU and CHB+JPT samples. (PDF 89 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Four genes with evidence for differences in mean expression between CEU and CHB+JPT due to different regulatory mechanisms. (PDF 67 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Four genes with evidence for differences in mean expression between CEU and CHB+JPT due to different regulatory mechanisms. (PDF 69 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spielman, R., Bastone, L., Burdick, J. et al. Common genetic variants account for differences in gene expression among ethnic groups. Nat Genet 39, 226–231 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1955

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing